Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 2585  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    


CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 51  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 220-224

Role of regional anaesthesia in major limb operations in children with cerebral palsy


1 MD, DA, All India Institute of physical medicine and rehabilitation centre, Haji Ali, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 M.S (Ortho), DNB (Rehab), All India Institute of physical medicine and rehabilitation centre, Haji Ali, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Vrushali C Ponde
MD, DA, Amit Apartments, 401, Veronica road bandra west, Mumbai 400050
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

There are several issues that influence the anaesthetic care of children with cerebral palsy such as sei­zures, spasticity, and sensitivity to pain medications, scoliosis, mental retardation, inability to communicate, respiratory infections, variable patterns of breathing, excessive drooling and other associated medical condi­tions. A series of 62 cases of cerebral palsy scheduled for limb deformity correction is described. Midazolam 0.5mg.kg -1 was given orally half an hour prior to induction. Glycopyrrolate 0.02 mg.kg -1 IV was administered. Propofol 3 mg.kg -1 was given to facilitate LMA placement. They breathed nitrous oxide and oxygen spontaneously through the LMA. Subsequent to this, infusion of propofol 2 mg.kg -1 .min -1 was com­menced. They received regional blocks such as continuous lumbar epidural for bilateral lower limb proce­dures, continuous sciatic& fascia iliaca compartment block for unilateral lower limb procedures and single shot infraclavicular block for upper limb, for below the elbow surgeries . Adequacy of the block was assessed by the necessity of any rescue analgesic, recovery was evaluated by Alderte score on table, and the time of first feed was noted. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by CHEOPS pain score. Aldrete score was 8 (SD=0.7) by the end of plaster application. Additional drugs for the analgesia were not required in any of the patients. First oral feed was possible 1 ½ hr (SD=1.1) after the procedure. CHEOPS score of 4-6 (Satisfactory levels of analgesia) was achieved into the postoperative period by top ups.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1757    
    Printed121    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded210    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal