|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 582-591
Patient with Recent Coronary Artery Stent Requiring Major Non Cardiac Surgery
Usha Kiran1, Neeti Makhija2
1 Prof and Head, Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiac Neuro Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Assoc Prof., Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiac Neuro Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||3-Mar-2010|
Usha Kiran, Deptt. of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cardiac Neuro Center AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Anaesthesiologists are increasingly confronted with patients who had a recent coronary artery stent implantation and are on dual anti-platelet medication. Non cardiac surgery and most invasive procedures increase the risk of stent thrombosis especially when procedure is performed early after stent implantation. Anaesthesiologist faces the dilemma of stopping the antiplatelet therapy before surgery to avoid bleeding versus perioperative stent thrombosis. Individualized approach should be adopted with following precautions. i) In a surgical patient with a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary stent, determine the date of the procedure, the kind of the stent inserted and the possibility of complications during the procedure. ii) Consider all patents with a recent stent implantation (e.g. less than three months for bare metal stents and less than one year for brachytherapy or drug eluting stents as high risk and consult an interventional cardiologist. iii) Any decision to postpone surgery, continue, modify or discontinue antiplatelet regimes must involve the cardiologist, anaesthesiologist, surgeon, haematologist and the intensivist to balance the risk and benefit of each decision.
|How to cite this article:|
Kiran U, Makhija N. Patient with Recent Coronary Artery Stent Requiring Major Non Cardiac Surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:582-91
|How to cite this URL:|
Kiran U, Makhija N. Patient with Recent Coronary Artery Stent Requiring Major Non Cardiac Surgery. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Aug 8];53:582-91. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2009/53/5/582/60337
| Introduction|| |
The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) has dramatically increased in India during the recent years to the extent that during the past 30 years the CAD rates have tremendously increased.  The evolution ofmanagement of coronary artery disease (CAD) over the last 30 years has also been dramatic. Until 1960's, medical treatment was the mainstay of management. In 1970's coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) revolutionized coronary artery disease treatment, and the overall strategy became invasive. In 1980's, with advent ofpercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery stents in 1990's, there has been a shift towards less invasive modality for revascularization. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) directed at severely stenotic lesions are highly effective in relieving angina. But a big question is whether this reduces the subsequent risk of major acute coronary events (MACE) such as death, myocardial infarction or angina?
Currently, over 90% of all PCI involve placement of stents  . Any PCI causes trauma to the vessel wall rendering the endoluminal surface thrombogenic. Hence adjunctive antiplatelet medication is crucial in preventing coronary thrombosis. Potential risk of non cardiac surgery shortly after coronary artery stenting prompted us to review the literature regarding optimal timing of safe surgery and challenges due to antiplatelet medication which concerns the anaesthesiateam in decision making.
Revascularization with coronary balloon angioplasty may cause vessel spasm and abrupt closure due to vessel recoil. The deployment of stents after angioplasty reduces the risk of abrupt vessel closure by sealing coronary artery dissection. Stent deployment also reduces long term risk of restenosis by preventing elastic recoil and negative vessel remodeling.
Two major types of coronary artery stents are commonly deployed:
1) Bare Metal Stents (BMS)
2) Drug Eluting Stents (DES)
Bare Metal Stents (BMS)
There is high incidence of late stent restenosis with BMS. In fact, restenosis is a side-effect ofthe normal healing process withthe growth ofthe scartissue around the stent mesh in a process called neointimal hyperplasia, which in some cases, can lead to occlusion ofthe coronary lumen. In patients receiving a BMS, in-stent restenosis requiring repeat intervention occurs in 1220% of cases, especially it peaks at three months.  Preshibiterv et al also documented that BMS are associated with restenosis rate of 25 - 30 0/6 .This process usually begins to occur in the first 6-8 weeks after stenting  but can be seen beyond one year following stent placement.  Procedures to treat stent restenosis are balloon angioplasty, mechanical de-bulking, repeat stenting, and intracoronary radiation (brachytherapy). 
Drug Eluting Stents (DES)
To prevent re-stenosis, drug eluting stents (DES) were designed, by coating a standard coronary stent with athin polymer containing an antiproliferative substance that inhibits smooth muscle proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia within the stented segment.  This has reduced the need for repeat intervention to almost 5%. 
Currently there are two major types of DES being inserted:
a) Sirolimus Eluting Stents (`Cypher' stent) or
b) Paclitaxel Eluting Stents (`Taxus' stent).
(SES) Sirolimus Eluting Stents: Sirolimus (rapamycin) is a macrolide antibiotic with potent immunosuppressive and antimitotic properties, which binds to its cytosolic receptor FKBP 12, and inhibits downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 kipl . This blocks transition from G 1 to S phase in the cell cycle and inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration.  Majority ofthe sirolimus is eluted from the polymer coating of the Cypher stent by 28 days  and fully eluted in 60 days  leaving a polymer BMS.
(PES) Paclitaxel Eluting Stent: Paclitaxel is a potent anti-tumor drug which inhibits microtubule formation during cell division.  About 10% ofthe drug is released from the polymer coating ofthe Taxus stent by 10 days with the rest of the drug remaining within the polymer indefinitely.
DES has been shown to have as good safety profiles as BMS in the short to medium term (6 - 12 months). The mechanism of obstruction of DES is different from that of BMS. In DES the stent struts remain uncovered, hence prone to thrombosis. However in BMS, the pathophysiological mechanism of obstruction is re-stenosis with neointimal hyperplasia and DES inhibits this process.  There are concerns that DES may cause endothelial dysfunction. This phenomenon may persist long after the drug is supposed to have fully eluted from the stent. There is a possibility of increase in the occurrence of acute infarction and late mortality with DES 
Anti Platelet Therapy:
Antiplatelet therapy is mandatory for patients after coronary artery stenting as platelets play a major role in thrombus formation after coronary stenting. Coronary artery stents have been shown to be associated with a very high risk of thrombosis. , Clopidogrel combined with aspirin is the commonly prescribed regime. Another theinopyridine derivative, ticlopidine, can also be used. Therapeutic effects are similar with both ofthese drugs. However; ticlopidine is limited by side effects such as neutropenia and throm bocytopenia. 
Mechanism of action Clopidogrel and ticlopidine are metabolized to an active compound in the liver which inhibits P2Y 12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) platelet receptor, thus inhibiting binding of fibrinogen to platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor complex. This prevents platelet aggregation by ADP stimulation.  Aspirin binds to enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX- 1) and prevents conversion of arachidonic acid to thrornboxane.
When to start antiplatelet therapy
Clopidogrel therapy is initiated priorto or immediately following stenting procedure. Aloading dose of clopidogrel 300 mg should preferably be given at least six hours priorto stenting procedure.  This is followed by repeated doses of clopidogrel 75 mg per day. Repeated daily dose of75 mg clopidogrel inhibits platelet aggregation with inhibition reaching a steady state between three to seven days following PCI.
The most widely used antiplatelet regimes:
For Bare metal stents. Loading dose of 300600 mg of clopidogrel is given before implantation of a BMS. After the procedure aspirin, 75-100mg and clopidogrel 75mg are continued for 4-6 weeks. Low dose aspirin therapy is continued for life.
For Drug eluting stents : After the loading dose of 300-600mg of clopidogrel, 75 mg should be continued for a minimum of 3 months after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stent and 6 months after apaclitaxeleluting stent. Aspirin dose and regime remain the same. Recent guidelines suggest dual antiplatelettherapyto be continued till one year. ,,
Contraindications to clopidogrel: Clopidogrel is contraindicated in patients with active pathological bleeding. Intracranial haemonhage is an infrequent complication. Arare complication reported after clopidogrel was thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).  Clopidogrel-induced platelet activation and aggregation was observed in this patient resulting in-stentthrombosis. However the incidence of TTP is very low.
Resistance to antiplatelet medication
The potential risk of stentthrombosis in patients with coronary stents who experience resistance to antiplatelet medication must be considered in the perioperative setting.
Clopidogrel resistance: The term clopidogrel resistance encompasses patients for whom drug does not achieve its pharmacological effect. Failure of therapy reflects patients who have recurrent thrombotic events despite receiving therapy. Causes ofclopidogrel resistance are listed in [Table 1].
No standard validated method is available to measure clopidogrel efficacy.  Platelet function can be monitored by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, which directly measures the function of clopidogrel target P2Y 12 receptor. Platelet function can also be assessed byplatelet aggregometry, flow cytometry of Pselectin, impedance aggregation, and platelet function analyser.  Bleeding time is rarely used as it is highly operator dependent and poorly reproducible. 
There is inter individual variability of platelet inhibition by antiplatelet agents which may lead to clopidogrel resistance, as clopidogrel is a pro-drug, which requires activation by cytochrome 450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 , andthereby response is variable [Table 2]
In a study byAggarwal et al on platelet function using optical light aggregometry has shownthat only 50% had a definitive response to clopidogrel.  Grossmann et al has shown that at a median of 5 days after initiating clopidogrel treatment with a loading dose of 300 mg, only 0-5% patients receiving clopidogrel had an inadequate response  .
Resistance to aspirin has also been described. Aspirin fails to reduce platelet production ofthromboxane A 2 by irreversible acetylation of cyclooxygenase-1(COX -1) and thus fail to prevent platelet activation and aggregation.  Aspirin resistance can be monitored by measuring platelet thromboxane A 2 production, or by assessing thromboxane-dependent platelet function. High urinary concentration of 11 -dehydrothromboxane B 2 a marker ofaspirin resistance, has been shown to be associated with increased incidence of vascular events.  A high dose of antiplatelet therapy is needed for patients who exhibit resistance,  as impaired response to antiplatelet agent has been shown to enhance stent thrombosis. 
Analyzing the risk of surgery after coronary artery stenting:
a) Risk of stent thrombosis
Kaluza et al first time in the year 2000 documented high risk of surgery in patients having recent insertion of coronary artery stents  . Out of 25 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with in 2 weeks of coronary stenting, 8 patients died. Out of which 6 deaths were due to acute myocardial infarction (AM 1) and two because of bleeding. None of the patients who underwent surgery between 15 - 39 days after artery coronary stenting died.  However Wilson et al reported mortality orAM1 or stent thrombosis in 8 out of 207 patients (3.9%) undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 2 months after receiving BMS 
Analyzing the outcome ofthe study undertaken by Sharma et al, on 27 patients who underwent non cardiac surgerywithin 3 weeks after BMS implantation 6 out of 7 patients, in whom the thenopyridine was stopped for more than 5 days died compared to only 1 of 20 patients who continued thenopyridine therapy (p <0.001).  Vicenzi et al reported 43% incidence of adverse cardiac events in 103 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery after stent deployment.  Reviewing the data about the risk of non-cardiac surgery in patients having DES deployed, McFadden et al reported stent thrombosis in 3 patients undergoing bladder polyp resection, colon cancer resection, and colonoscopywith polypectomy  Sirolimus eluting stent (SES) thrombosis was reported in 2 patients after surgery at 4 months and 21 months by Nesser et al. 
However in a single center series of 38 patients who underwent 41 major and 18 minor non cardiac surgeries at a median of 9 months after successful DES implantation no major adverse events were seen by Compton et al .  No stent thrombosis was seen among 114 patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery after a median of 236 days from stent replacement by Bakhru et al  These studies explain the risk of surgery despite stent implantation in a patient of coronary artery disease, and highlights the importance of delaying surgery if and when possible following stent implantation.
Thromboelastogrpahyhas shown evidence of hypercoagulability during surgery which may lasts for 7 days in post operative period, evident in the form of decrease reaction time (r-time), increase in clot strength, with continuous post operative increase in maximum amplitude (MA).  Within 2 hours of completion of surgery MA has been shown to be increased by 68% raisingthe prediction ofthrombotic complication.  Hypercoagulability seems to be caused predominantly by platelet activity which is not identified by standard coagulation monitoring  . There is a significant increase in ADP induced platelet aggregation at 24 - 28 h after surgery which persists till 7t day. Platelets are not activated in the post operative period, but they are more prone to being activated as demonstrated by aggregation studies and the platelet count is significantly increased on 7h day. 
Thus three factors play important role in acute stent thrombosis as shown in [Table 3].
b) Antiplatelet therapy and risk of bleeding if antiplatelet medication is continued
Patients taking dual antiplatelettherapy may show increased risk of major bleeding complication. Increased bleedingtime is seen when combined therapy of clopidogrel and aspirin is used, through synergistic antiplatelet actions.  Whatever evidence of increased bleeding in the post operative period is available with combined therapy, it is in patients undergoing cardiac surgery , There are several papers describing series in which no difference was found interms ofbleeding between patients with and without dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel). There is little evidence of increased surgical bleed in non-cardiac surgery. Rather no difference in the transfusion requirement was seen regardless of the use of antiplatelet agents by Sharma et al. 
c) Risk of coronary events if antiplatelet medication is discontinued
What is the overall risk of coronary adverse events in patients with stents if antiplatelettherapy is discontinued? There are no such reports which quantify this statement. There are few reports documenting adverse events when antiplatelettherapywas withdrawn. Kaluza et al showed that non-cardiac surgery soon after BMS placement was linked to a very high rate of adverse events.  A case has been described where a patient with DES placement two weeks before surgery suffered a myocardial infarction in the post-anaesthesia care unit due to stentthrombosis. Patient had missed only one dose of aspirin and clopidogrel preoperatively. 
AHA Guidelines following Coronary Artery Stenting
The American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Society for cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAT) and several other societies engage in production of guidelines in the area of cardiovascular diseases from time to time. These guidelines attempt to define the practices that meet the need ofmostpatients inmost circumstances. The aim of the guidelines is to improve the patient care. The ultimate judgment regarding the care ofthe particular patient is to be made by the clinician keeping in mind all the circumstances.
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) has laid down guidelines  for antiplatelet therapy following coronary stenting, which were published in 2006. The guidelines have been updated from time to time.
Important aspects of the guidelines are:
-A delay of 4-6 weeks between the BMS and elective non cardiac surgery is recommended to allow at least partial endothelization ofthe stent but not more than 12 weeks when restenosis may begin to occur.
-In patients treated with DES, elective surgical procedures with significant risk of bleeding should be deferred up to one year. In emergent non-cardiac surgerythat requires stopping clopidogrel, the guidelines recommend continuing aspirintherapy if possible, and restarting clopidogrel as soon as possible.
-Risk of stoppingthe antiplatelet therapy should be weighed againstthe benefit of reduction of bleeding complication. Ifthere is need to stop antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel should be stopped for as minimum time as possible and restarted early. Aspirin should be continued perioperatively. Luckie et a1 47 in their recent article in 2009 have listed the following recommendations [Table 4]
Approach to a patient for major surgery following recent coronary artery stenting Regarding perioperative approach inpatients with coronary stents there is no accepted standard or optimal approach for management.  Multidisciplinarydiscussionbetweenthe cardiologist, surgeon, anaesthesiologist and haematologist should take place.
The key questions in such patients during pre anaesthesia evaluation are
1) When was the PCI done?
2) What is the type of stent?
3) How many stents were placed?
4) Was the revascularization complete?
5) Drug regime and any irregularities of the treatment?
6) History of any adverse cardiac event/ stent throm bosis?
6) Urgency of surgery? / Can the surgery be delayed?
7) Bleeding risk during surgery?
8) History of conditions prone to stent thrombosis [Table 5]
9) Whether antiplatelet medication is to be maintained in perioperative period or stopped before operation?
An important aspect of pre-operative visit is patient education. Patient should be explained the importance of antiplatelet therapy, the needto discontinue and to restart the therapy after surgery
Investigations forplatelet count and platelet function should be undertaken. Whole blood and platelet concentrates should be arranged priorto surgery.
Elective surgical procedures: It is the consensus that all elective procedures should be delayed for at least 4-6 weeks in patients who have received BMS. Preanaesthetic evaluation for elective surgery in patients with DES plays a significant role in decision making and risk assessment. Earlier reports suggested that if there is no major risk of bleeding, all elective surgeries within 6 months after DES implantation should be managed similar to urgent surgery. However the current consensus is that elective surgeries should be delayed for 12 months after DES placement [Figure 1].
Urgent surgical procedures
For urgent surgical procedures, modification of antiplatelet medication should be individualized. When there is high risk of bleeding, as per latest guidelines, clopidogrel should be withheld for as short period as possible and restarted as soon as possible though the earlier recommendations were to stop for at least 5 days before surgery [Figure 2]. Continuation of aspirin should be based on the nature of surgery. If there is intermediate risk of bleeding and the length of dual antiplatelet medication is less than 6 months, continue both medications; ifmore than 6 months, discontinue clopidogrel and continue aspirin.
In the operating room meticulous monitoring of electrocardiogram and trans esophageal echocardiography/ trans thoracic echocardiography is essential for early detection of ischaemia / infarction, should stent thrombosis occur. In case of profound bleeding, platelet count and thromboelastography may be performed and need for platelet transfusion assessed.
An emergency bypass surgery or percutaneous intervention maybe required in a patient with recent coronary artery stent undergoing major non-cardiace surgery. Hence the non cardiac surgery following recent coronary artery stent should preferably be performed in a centre where interventional cardiology care for prompt intervention is available, in case of stent thrombosis.
Alternate anti-thrombotic therapy
An appropriate alternative anti-thrombotic strategy is a controversial issue, with no consensus of opinion for any particular regime.Heparin therapy either unfcactionated by intravenous infusion or low molecular weighte heparin by subcutaneous injection has been proposed during the period of time theinopyridine is stopped, but effrcacy has not been proven. 
Concepts about regional anaesthesia:
Dual antiplatelet therapy presents problems for regional anaesthesa. The placement of neuro-axial block in patients taking dual antiplatelet thenpy can not be recommended unless platelet function is with in acceptable limits or platelet transfusion is given before operation. The guidelines produced in 2003, by ASRA that without prior platelet transfusion clopidogel should be stopped for minimum of 7 days and ticlopidine for a minimum of 14 days.  The timing of the removal of epidural catheter and early re-instatement of the artiplatelet therapy must be consdered. Delaying start of dual antiplatelet therapy in a patient of neuro-axial catheter removal may expose the patient to an unacceptable risk of stent thrambosis. A spirin and NSAID do not represent an additional risk of spinal heamatama, in patients receiving spinal or epidnal anaesthesia
Prophylactic coronary revascularization
Prophylactic coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or PCI prior to non-cardiac surgery has previously been widely practiced, to reduce peri operative cardiac complications/ adverse reactions in patients with known coronary artery disease. However, currently this practice is reduced as the data suggest that pre operative revascularization has little impact on peri operative adverse cardiac events when stenting is performed solely for this purpose.
If a patient with coronary artery disease is known to require non cardiac surgery, the first question to ask is whether the patient really needs revascularization. The CARP (CoronaryArtery Revascularization Prophylaxis) study suggests that revascularization may not be necessary for a large number of patients without an unstable coronary syndrome or other high risk features. Pre operative prophylactic coronary revascularization should be considered as perACC/AHAguidelines.  [Table 6].
The risks and benefits of each strategy should be assessed, keeping in account patients symptoms, comorbidities, and coronary anatomy, degree of associated ischaemia and urgency and type of surgeryto be performed.
Stems with pro-Healing Surfaces
Ongoing development in stent technology may render concerns regarding the long duration of anti-platelet therapy necessary following DES implantation obsolete. A number of different pm-healing surfaces are becoming available which may allow much more rapid and complete endothelialization of the stented segment. The Genous-R stent consists of a standard stainless steel stent, which is coated in a matrix contaululgmonoclonal antibodies targeted specifically at the CD34 receptor. This receptor is exclusive to the surface of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), which are preferentially captured onto the stem surface. Once attached to the stem surface, the EPCs mature into endothelial cells, rapidly creating a smooth endothelial surface within the stented segment without the risk ofrestenosis. 
| Conclusions|| |
One should learn from this review that patients with recent coronary artery stents are on antiplatelet therapy and are on high risk ofperi-operative complication. The anaesthesiologist faces the dilemma of stopping the antiplatelet treatment before operation to avoid bleeding versus risk of post operative stentthrombosis. When faced with a patient who requires maj or noncardiac surgery and has a coronary stent, the risk of stentthrombosis needs lobe assessed against both the potential risk of bleeding and adverse consequences.
Till now there is no definite evidence that bleeding in non-cardiac surgery is not common and not a troublesome complication when compared with incidence of cardiac events. With high level of scientific evidence anaesthologist, surgeon and cardiologist should establish local treatment algorithms forthe management of patients who have had previous PCI and coronary stent and are now to undergo surgery and follow the recommendations of current guidelines. Major noncardiac surgery should be avoided for 4-6 weeks for bare metal stents unless immediately lifesaving. After DES implantation, surgery within 3-6 months also substantially increases the risk of cardiac complications.
Non cardiac surgery should be delayed for 12 months. Even beyond 12 months, report of the late stent thrombosis suggest, that at least one antiplatelet agent should be continued perioperatively. Surgery which cannot be delayed should be performed on dual antiplatelet medication whenever possible
The multifaceted approach inclusive of cardiologist, surgeon, anaesthesiologist and haematologist should be used with each patient in order to provide maximum individual benefits. Each patient is different and treatthe patient and not the stent.
| References|| |
|1.||Gupta R, Gupta VP. Meta analysis of coronary heart disease prevalence inlndia. IndHeartJ 1996; 48:241-45. |
|2.||Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous intervention: a randomized control trial. JAIvIA 2002; 288:2411 -20. |
|3.||Ellis SG Bajzar CT, BhattDL, etal. Real world bare metal seeming-Identification of patients at low and high risk of 9 months coronary revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63:135-40. |
|4.||Presbiterv P, Boccuzzi G. Restenosis treatment in the drug eluting stem era. Ital Heart J 2005; 6:514-21. |
|5.||Eagle KA, B erger PB, Calkins H, et al. ACGAHA. Guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for non-cardaic surgery-Executive summary. Areport on ofAmerican College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. (Committee to update 1996 Guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for Non-cardiac surgery). Anesth. Analg. 2002; 94: 1052-64. |
|6.||Ser .iys PW Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: Atime related phenomenon. Aquantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients a 1, 2, 3 and 4 months. Circulation 1988; 77:361-71. |
|7.||Worthley Mi, Anderson TJ, Traboulsi M, et al. Registry data evaluating the effectiveness of drug eluting stems for the treatment of symptomatic in- stem re-stenosis. HeartLung Circ 2006; 15:300-5. |
|8.||Costa MA, Simon DI. Molecular basis of re-stenosis and drug eluting stems. Circulation 2005: 11; 2257-73. |
|9.||Colombo A. lakovou I. Drug eluting stems.: The gold standard for percutaneous coronary revascularization. EurHeartJ2004; 2: 895-7. |
|10.||Serry R, Penny WF. Endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus eluting stentplacement. JAm Coll carcliol2005; 46:237-8. |
|11.||Khugherz BD - Llanos G Lieuallen \ et al. Twentyeight-days efficiency and pharmacokinetics of the sirolimus-eluting stent. CoronArt Dis 2002; 13: 183-8. |
|12.||Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to sirolimus eluting stem: should we be cautious? Circulation2004;109: 701-5. |
|13.||NordmnnAJ, Briel M, Bucher HC. Mortality inrandomized controlled trials comparing drug eluting vs. bare metal stems in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2784-814. |
|14.||BrabandtHV Stent thrombosis: antiplatelet alone won't do the j ob. Br Med J 2007; 334: 57. |
|15.||Board L, Lee T, Conroy M, et al. Successful managem ent of patients with a drug-eluting coronary stem presenting for elective, non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:19-22. |
|16.||Bertrand ME, Rupprecht HJ, Urban P, et al. Double blind study of safety of clopidogrel with or without a loading dose in combinationwith aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary seeming: the clopidogrel aspirin stem international cooperative study (CLASSICS). Circulation 2000;102: 624-9. |
|17.||Pothula S, Sanchala VT, Nagappala B, Inchiosa MA jr. The effect of pre operative antiplatelet/anticoagulant prophylaxis on post operative blood loss in Cardiac Surgery. AnesthAnalg 2004; 98: 4-10. |
|18.||Smith SC Jr. Feldman TE, Hirschfield J W Jr, et al. ACC/ AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ SCAI writing committee to update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;113: e 166-286. |
|19.||Stone GW, Aronow HD. Long term care after percutaneous coronary intervention: focus on the role of antiplatelet therapy, Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 641-52. |
|20.||Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur HeartJ 2005; 26: 804-47. |
|21.||Zimarino M, Renda G, De CaterinaR. Optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy in recipients of coronary drug eluting stems. Drugs 2005; 65: 725-32. |
|22.||VanMach MA, EichA, Wielemann LS, Munzel T. Subacute coronary stem thrombosis in a patient developing clopidogrel associated thrombosic thrombocytopenic purpura. Heart 2005; 91: e14. |
|23.||Nguyen TA, Divdati JG Pharand C. Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence. JAm Coll Cardiol 2005; 45:1157-64. |
|24.||Lau WC, Gurbel PA, Watkins PB, et al. Contribution of hepatin cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolic activity to the phenomenon of clopidogrel resistance. Circulation 2004; 109:166-71. |
|25.||Lau WC, Waskell LA, Watkins, PB et al. Atorvastatin reduces the ability of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation: a new drug- drug reaction. Circulation 2003; 107:32-7. |
|26.||Agarwal S, Coakely M, Reddy K. Riddell A, Mallett S. Quantifying the effect of antiplatelet therapy: a comparison of the platelet function analysis (PFA-100) and modified thromboelastography (mTEG) with light transmission platelet aggregometry. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:676-83. |
|27.||Grossmann R, Sokolova O, Schnurr A, et al. Variable extent of Clopidogrel in patients after coronary stenting. Thromb Heamost 2004; 92: 1201-6. |
|28.||Hankey GJ, Eikelboom SW. Aspirin Resistance. Lancet 2006; 367; 60&17. |
|29.||Eikeboom SW, Hirsh J, Weitz Jl, Johnston M, YQ, Yusuf S. Aspirin - resistant thromboxane biosynthesis and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. Circulation 2002;105: 1650-5. |
|30.||Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: consideration and management. J Interv Cardiol 2006;19:439-48. |
|31.||Wenaweser P, Dorffler-Melly J, Imboden K, et al. Stent thrombosis is associated with an impaired response to antiplatelet therapy. JAm Coil Cardiol. 2005; 48:1745-52. |
|32.||Kaluza GL, Joseph J, Lee JR, Raizner ME, RaiznerAE. Catastrophic outcomes of non cardiac surgery soon after coronary stenting. JAm Coil Cardiol 2000; 35: 1288-94. |
|33.||Wilson SH, Fasseas, Oxford JL, et al. Clinical outcome of a patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the two months following coronary stenting. Am Coil Cardiol 2003:42; 234-4. |
|34.||Sharma AK, Aj ani AE, Hamwi SM, et al. Maj or non-cardiac surgery following coronary stenting. When is it safe to operate? Catheter Cardiovasc Inter 2004; 63: 141-5. |
|35.||Vicenzi IvAI, Meislitzer T, Heitzinger B, Halaj M, Fleisher LA, Metzler H. Coronary artery stenting and non cardiac surgery: a prospective outcome study. Br JAnaesth 2006; 96: 686-93. |
|36.||McFaddenEP, Stabile E, Regar et al. Late thrombosis in drug eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of anti platelets therapy. Lancet 2004; 364: 1591-21. |
|37.||Nasserl M,Kapaliovich M,Markiewicz W Late thrombosis of siroli nus-eluting stents following non cardiac surgery. Catheter cardiovasc Interven 2005; 65: 516-9. |
|38.||Compton PA, Zankar AA, Adesanya AO, Banerjee S, Brilakis E. Risk ofnon-cardiac surgery after coronarydrug eluting scent implantation. Am J Cardio12006:98; 1212-3. |
|39.||Bakhru M, Saber W, Brotman D, et al. Is discontinuation of antiplatelet herapy after 6 months safe in patients with drug eluting stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery? Cleve Chin J Med 2006; 73: S23. |
|40.||Mahla E, Long T, Vicenzi MN, et al. Thromboelastography for monitoring prolonged hypercoagulability after major abdominal surgery. AnesthAnaig 2001; 92:572-7. |
|41.||McCrath DJ, Cerboni E, Frumento RJ, Hirsh AS, Bennett-Guerrero E. Thromboelastography maximum amplitude predicts postoperative thrombotic complication including myocardial infarction. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1576-83. |
|42.||Sonama CM, Thiry D, Elalamy L, et al. Peni operative activation of hemostasis in vascular surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 94: 74-8. |
|43.||Payme DA, Hayes PD, Jones CI, Balham P, NaylorAR, Goodall AR. Combined therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin significantly increases bleeding time through a synergistic action. J Vasc Surg 2002: 35;1204-9. |
|44.||Ray 5G, Deniz S, Olivieri et al. Increased blood product use among coronary artery bypass patients prescribed pre operative aspirin and clopidogrel. BMCCardiovasc Disord 2003; 3:3. |
|45.||Yende S, Wunderink RG Effect of clopidogrel on bleeding after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med 2001:29;2271-5. |
|46.||Murphy 1T, Fahy BG Thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in the postanaesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg2005;101:971-3. |
|47.||Luckie M J, Khatter RS, Fraser DG. Non cardiac surgery and antiplatelet therapy following coronary artery stenting. Heart online.12 th Feb 2009;1: e 1-15 http:#Hearf.bmj.com |
|48.||Gurbel PA, Di Chiara, Tantry US. Antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug -eluting stents. Duration, resistance, alternatives and management of surgical patients. Am J Card 2007;100: 18M-25M (Suppl). |
|49.||Harlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Benzon H, et al. Regional anesthesia in the anticoagulated patient: defining the risk (he second ASRA Consensus Conference on Neuraxial Anasthesia and Anticoagulation) Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28:172-97. |
|50.||Fleischer LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, ChaikafE, Fleischm ann KE, Freeman WK, Froehlich JB, Kasper EK, Korster JR, Riegel B, Robb IF. ACC/ AHA 2007 Guidelines on Peni operative cardiovascular evaluation and care for non cardiac surgery: executive summary. JAm Coil Cardiol 2007; 50: 1707J2. |
|51.||Silber S. Capturing circulating endothelial progenitor cells: Anew concept tested in the HEALING Studies. Minerva Cardioangiol 2006; 54: 1-3. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]