Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1816  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 654-661 Table of Contents     

Comparative Study of Greater Palatine Nerve Block and Intravenous Pethidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Palatoplasty


1 Asst Prof, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte, Mangalore, DK, 574018, Karnataka, India
2 Assoc Prof, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte, Mangalore, DK, 574018, Karnataka, India
3 Prof & HOD, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte, Mangalore, DK, 574018, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication3-Mar-2010

Correspondence Address:
Manjunath R Kamath
Chief Cardiac Anaesthesiologist, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, KS Hegde Medical Academy, Deralakatte, Mangalore, DK, 574018
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 20640092

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions
 

Greater palatine nerve block anaesthetizes posterior portions of the hard palate and its overlying soft tissues. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and ease of the nerve block for cleft palate surgeries in children with i.v. pethidine for postoperative pain management. A prospective, double blind, randomized trial, enrolled 50 children aged below 10 years scheduled for palatoplasty and were alternatively allocated to two groups. Group A received intravenous pethidine 1mg.kg-1, whereas Group B, bilateral greater palatine nerve block with bupivacaine 0.25%, 1ml on each side, before the surgical stimulation. Modified Aldrete Scoring System, Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Brussels Sedation Score were employed to assess recovery, quality of analgesia and sedation respectively, by the nursing staff. Whenever pain score was >8, 0.5mg.kg-1 of pethidine was given intravenously for rescue analgesia in both groups. Recovery scores were better in Group B (p=0.007). In the immediate postoperative period, pain score was more in Group A (number of patients with pain score >8, 44% v/s 12%, p= .0117). Requirement for rescue analgesia was more in Group A (60 times v/s 7). The average sedation scores were similar. There was a higher incidence of agitation in Group A (66 vs. 30). The incidence of deep sedation was nearly half in Group B (34 Vs 63). Greater palatine nerve block was considered successful in 88% of cases. Greater palatine nerve block produces more effective, consistent and prolonged analgesia than pethidine.

Keywords: Greater palatine nerve block, Palatoplasty, Postoperative analgesia, Pethidine


How to cite this article:
Kamath MR, Mehandale SG, Raveendra U S. Comparative Study of Greater Palatine Nerve Block and Intravenous Pethidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Palatoplasty. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:654-61

How to cite this URL:
Kamath MR, Mehandale SG, Raveendra U S. Comparative Study of Greater Palatine Nerve Block and Intravenous Pethidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Palatoplasty. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Jun 18];53:654-61. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2009/53/6/654/60239


   Introduction Top


Postoperative pain is expected but nonetheless undesirable `by-product' of all surgical procedures. In­adequate pain control may result in increased morbid­ity or mortality. [1]

Various studies world over have shown the ten­dency to under treat postoperative pain for the fear of resultant adverse effects like respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, aspiration etc., due to overdose of analgesics. This is truer in case of young children undergoing surgeries. [2]

As such, children with cleft palate tend to have a compromised airway due to associated congenital anomalies like Pierre Robin syndrome, Treacher Collin syndrome etc., After surgical correction of cleft palate (palatoplasty), they are more prone to develop post­operative respiratory difficulty due to narrowed airway, increased secretion, pain, and sedation caused by opioid analgesics. [3],[4] In recent times, undisputed supremacy of opioids in treating postoperative pain has been chal­lenged by regional blocks mainly to overcome the side effects of narcotics. Several authors have attempted to validate effectiveness of regional blocks or peripheral nerve blocks to alleviate postoperative pain. Though a number of studies are available comparing systemic analgesics to regional blocks in treating postoperative pain due tohemiotomies,circumcision,hydrocelectomy, hypospadias repairs, ophthalmic surgeries etc., surpris­ingly very few attempts have been made in employing nerve blocks for cleft surgeries. [6],[7]

This study was done to compare quality of sys­temic analgesia achievedwith intravenous pethidine and local analgesia with greater palatine nerve block for postoperative pain in children undergoing pal atoplasty.

Greaterpalatine nerve supplies sensah onto most of the hard palate. It exits through the greater palatine foramen. Thenerve is blockedbil aterally as it exitsthrough the foramen on palatal side opposite the anterior part of the 3' molar or posterior part of the 2 nd molar tooth. The foramen can be located by pressing a sm all cotton swab opposite firstmolartooth andproceedingposter - orlyfill it `falls' into a depression created by the foramen. A thin, short beveled needle is inserted from opposite side of the mouth atright angles into this depression and about 0.6 to Iml of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected after negative aspiration for blood [8]


   Methods Top


After obtaining hospital ethics committee permis­sion andinformedwritten consent from the parent, 50 children scheduled for palatoplasty in Justice K.S.Hegde Charitable Hospital, Mangalore, between February 2003 andMay 2004were studied Children belonging toAmerican Society ofAnesthesiologists (ASA)physi­cal status Grade I and II and aged below 10 years were includedinthe study.

Children with co-morbid conditions like congeni­talheart disease,respiratorypathology, central nervous system disorders, associated other craniofacial anoma­lies like micrognathia, Pierre Robin Syndrome,  Treacher Collins syndrome More Details were excludedfrom this study. Also children posted for combinedprocedures like palato­plasty with cheilopl asty or submucosal alveolar bone grafting (SAB G) were not included. Known hypersen­sitivitytolocal anaesthetics oropioidswas considered contraindication forinclusion in the study.

Preoperative visit was done to allay anxiety and to establish goodrapportwith the patients.

After clinical evaluation androutine investbalions, all patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.5mg.kg -1 and atropine lml orally, one hourbefore surgery. After securing intravenous access and preoxygenationfor 3minutes, all children were induced with thiopentone 5mg.kg -1 andvecuronium bromide 0. lmg.kg -1 was used to facilitate intubation. Intubation was done with the appropriate sized endotracheal tube andventilatedwith 33% oxygen in nitrous oxide and 0.4% halothane. Relaxation was maintained with vecuronium as and when required.

Patients were alternatively allocated to two groups, each consisting of 25 patients.

Group A: receivedintravenouspethidine lmg.kgg -1

and

Group B: receivedbilateralgreaterpalatinenerve block with bupivacaine 0.25%, usually lml on each side, before the surgical stimulation [Figure 1]. Tomini­mizebleedingfrom the operative site, adrenaline di­luted to 5mcg.ml -1 innormal saline was infiltrated Re­covery was assessed by employing Modifi edAldrete Scoring System. [Table 1] [9],[10],[11],[12] In the postoperative ward, they received supplemental oxygen for one hour. Quality of analgesia was assessedby Children's Hos­pital Eastern OntarioPain Scale (CHEOPS) [Table 2] as described by McGrath (1985)."Whenever the pain score is more than 8, rescue analgesia with 0.5mg.kg -1 ofpethidine intravenously was given.

Brussels Sedation Score [14] [Table 3] was used to assess sedation. Along with these, heart rate, mean ar­terial blood pressure and oxygen saturation were as­sessed every 15 minutes for first 1 hour, then every 30 minutes for the next 2 hours, hourly thereafter up to 10 hours by blinded observer (staff nurse). Adverse ef­fects of narcotics were looked for.

Statistical analysis:

The formula for calculating the sample size for qualitative study is



n=sample size, p=success rate ofthe block 95% (0.95) 8 Q= 1-P (1-0.95=0.05), L=allowable error, which we have taken as 10% using 95% confidence interval.

So n= (4X0.95 X0.05) - (0.1X0.1) = 19.

We included 25 children in each group to allow up to 30% dropout.

The results were analysed using chi-square test (X2) and student's unpaired ttest. A `p' value of =0.05 was considered statistically significant, <0.01=highly significant (Hsig), <0.001=very highly significant (Vhsig) and >0.05=not significant (ns).


   Results Top


Both the groups were similar with respect to de­mographic characteristics and average duration of sur­gery. [Table 4]

1. Recovery score:

Recovery was better in greaterpalatine nerve block group (p=0.007 as shown by the higher recovery scores in this Group B. i.e., 10 (40%) patients had maximum possible recovery score of 10 and none had recovery score of =7 [Figure 2]. Whereas in Group A(pethedine), only 2(8%) patients had the maximum recovery score and one patient had a recovery score of 7.

2. Pain Scores:

Average pain scores are almost similar and not statistically different between the two groups [Figure 3]. In the immediate postoperative period, 44% of Group Apatients had pain score more than 8, whereas in Group B, it is only 12% which is statistically significant (p= 0.0117) [Figure 4]. The total incidence of significant pain requiring rescue analgesia was 60 times in Group A, whereas it is only 7 in Group B i. e. almost 9 times higher. All the children in Group Arequired rescue analgesia at least once but 22 patients in Group B did not require any supplemental analgesia [Table 5]. 80% ofpethi­dine group patients needed rescue analgesia within the first hour of the postoperative period and among these, 32% needed rescue analgesia immediately in the post­operative ward. On an average, children in pethidine group (Group A) required rescue analgesia by 31.8 minutes. Considering the duration of intraopperative period, analgesia produced by pethidine in a dose of lmgkg -1 body weight did not last longer than 2-3 hours. In general, every patient received about 2.4 injections of pethidine in the observation period.

In block group (Group B), ally three patients re­quired rescue analgesia throughout the study period All these patients were given supplemental analgesain the immediate postoperative period indicating inad­equate or failed nerveblock. The remaining (88%) patients did not require any additional analgesia for next 10 hours. This implies that the duration of analgesia produced by greater palatine nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine is longer than ten hairs.

3. Brussels Sedation Score

The average sedation scores are canparable. But there was higher incidence of agitation in Pethidine group (66 vs. 30) [Figure 5]. In Group A, all the patients had sedation score of 5 at least once in the observationpe­Hod In group B, numbers of patients with sedatien scare 5 were only 15 i.e., 60%. 40% of the Group B patients were comfortable throughout the observation period.

Incidence of oversedation(sedation score 2 arless) ismore when pethidine was used (63 vs. 34) [Figure 6]. One patient was unarousable fifteen minutes after giving rescue analgesia. Fortunately he did not require any additional intervention to maintain adequate respiration. None of the patients with regional nerve block were unarousable.

4. Heart rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure

There is no significant difference in average heart rate and average mean arterial blood pressure among the groups. There were noticeable wide swings in the heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure among in­dividual patients in pethidine group and in those who received rescue analgesia in block group. However, no such variation was observed among the patients in block group, who did not require any supplemental analgesia. Thus, the changes in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure may be attributable to inadequate analgesia.

5. Hypoxia and other adverse events

Shivering was noticed in two patients belonging to block group which was managed conservatively.

There was an episode of airway obstruction in each of the groups, due to bleeding and secretions, which was relieved by suctioning and positioning the patient in left lateral. Bleeding in the postoperative ward was managed by packing and positioning. Other minor complications like anxiety, cough and secretion were self-limiting. However, Pethidine did not produce PONY and desaturation in children as frequently as reported. [15],[16],[17]


   Discussion Top


Recently there is an increasing awareness regard­ingthe need for complete well being of the child in the postoperative period and not just a pain free state. Sedation and other adverse events produced by opio­ids do not help in achieving such a goal. Local anaes­thesia with nerve blocks appears to be the answer in such circumstances. Moreover, regional and general anaesthesia techniques are no longer considered as al­temative but instead, as complementary. This is espe­cially true in pediatrics where regional anaesthesia is essentially performed under general anaesthesia. The association of the two techniques has dramatically cut down the risks of both procedures. [15],[16] Hodges, Stephens and co-workers (2000Y while reviewing ana­esthesia for cleft surgeries opined that opioids are bet­ter avoided and intraoperative and postoperative anal­gesia can be achieved by local infiltration with local anaesthetics or by nerve block. But the authors have not mentioned about possibility of greater palatine nerve block for analgesia in this context.

Though majority of palatal mucosa is innervated by greater palatine nerve it also derives supply from lesser palatine and nasopalatine nerves, all are branches of maxillary nerve. During surgery, nasopalatine nerve is divided as it exits through the foramen. The lesser palatine nerve which supplies the soft palate lies in close proximity to greater palatine nerve in the canal before the latter comes out of the foramen. [8] As we inject local anaesthetic into the foramen we might have blocked the maxillary nerve itself or its branches which may ex­plain the total analgesia of the palate.

In our study, recovery from general anaesthesia is better when regional block is used for intra and post­operative analgesia. Our observation is in agreement with the findings of Bosenberg AT and Kimble FW(1995). [6] They opined that postoperative awaken­ing was rapid and smooth with no respiratory depres­sion if regional analgesia is used instead of systemic opioids.

The total incidence of significant pain requiring rescue analgesia was 8.5 times lesser in the block group. This clearly demonstrates the opioid sparing effect of regional blocks as described by Schug and co-work­ers (1994) [17] . We used 0.25% concentration of the bupivacaine solution and the duration of analgesia outlasted observation period of 10 hours. 0.25% bupivacaine is known to produce prolonged periph­eral nerve block. This is similar to the findings of Santhanam S and co-workers (2002) [18] who reported that nearly half the children undergoing tympanomas­toid surgery receiving greater auricular nerve block did not require additional analgesics in the first 24 hours. Heikey R and co-workers (1992) [19] reported that the duration of analgesia ranged from 9.2 to 13 hours with the same concentration of bupivacaine for brachial plexus block. There is a need to extend the duration of period of observation to know the exact duration of analgesia produced by greater palatine nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine. In our study, patients receiving pethidine were often deeply sedated or agitated at vari­ous points of time in the observation period whereas those who had greater palatine nerve block were mostly awake and calm, which is a desirable state. Our results support the views of Lewis N (1978). [20] He commented that intraoperative nerve block greatly enhances post­operative pain relief. Current study demonstrates ex­cellent postoperative analgesia achieved with greater palatine nerve block and there were no complications related to the technique. Success rate of block was 88% and it may be possible to improve this rate with experience. Alternatively, to minimize failures an open technique may be tried. That is, infiltrating the nerve under direct vision after the elevation of palatal flap, which is a part of surgery.

Drawback of this approach is there would be a lag period between the onset of surgical stimulation and nerve blockade. Further work is needed to evaluate suitability or supremacy of either - of the techniques

Doyle E and Hudson I (1992) [3] reported three cases ofhypoxaemia among 143 cases of cleft palate repair. One case of respiratory depression was attrib­utable to opioid analgesics and two cases had respira­tory obstruction due to Pierre-Robin Syndrome. They also observed three cases of postoperative profound respiratory depression due to narcotics among children undergoing surgery for cleft lip. In contrast Bailey PL(1992) [21] observed that the postoperative hypoxaemia were more likely as a result of surgical technique than the use of opioids. Keith L 22 observed that palato­plasty by itself reduces the air passage and rarely, res­piratory obstruction in the postoperative period some­ times requiring urgent airway interventions.

In the present study, despite the use of pethidine there was no incidence of desaturation in the postop­erative period. Xue FS and co-workers (1998) [23] re­ported significant correlation between recovery scores and postoperative hypoxia. In their series, incidence of postoperative hypoxia was more than one-third of the children after palatoplasty when left on room air and 25% of the children had low recovery score (less than 7). Our data shows no incidence of hypoxia and all had recovery scores>7. They also came across high incidence of respiratory obstruction (upto 41%) in the postoperative period where as we had only 4%. This may be attributed to selection of patients without other congenital anomalies, shorter duration of surgery, dif­ference in the surgical technique, better recovery from anaesthesia, routine supplemental oxygenation during the first hour of the postoperative period, adequate analgesia resulting in awake and calm child.

In our series, two children in block group had shivering, indicating antishivering property of pethidine. However, Pethidine did not produce PONY in chil­dren as frequently as reported. [24],[25]

Overall, there was definite advantage in the re­covery and postoperative comfort in children received greater palatine nerve block.

Conclusion: Greater palatine nerve block is easy to learn and to perform with very high success rate. It is very effective in producing postoperative analgesia without any significant adverse events. Moreover it pro­duces prolonged analgesia; duration of which has to be ascertained byfurther evaluation. By employing regional techniques we not only make the patient's stay in the postoperative period comfortable, but also avoid many serious adverse events associated with traditional an­algesic regimens.



 
   References Top

1.Merskey H, Fersard DC, Bonica JJ. Pain in terms. Pain 1979; 249:6.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.2. Anand KJS, Carr DB. The neuroanatomy, neurophysi­ology& neurochemistry of pain stress and analgesics in children. Pediatr C1inNorthAmer 1989; 36:795-822.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.3. Doyle E, Hudson I. Anaesthesia for primary repair of cleft lip and cleft palate: a review of 244 procedures. PaedAnaesth 1992; 2: 139-145.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.4. Schettler D. Intra and postoperative complications in surgical repair of clefts in infancy. J Maxillofac Surg 1973;1:40-4.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.5. Samuel M, Ham pson D, Evans P. Prospective to a ran­domized double blind controlled trial to assess efficacy of a double caudal analgesia in hypospadias repair. J Paediatr Surg 2002; 37: 168-174.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.6. Bosenberg AT, Kimble FW. Infra orbital nerve block in neonates for cleft lip repair. Anatomical study and clini­cal application. Br JAnaesth 1995; 74:506-508.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.7. Hodges SC, Hodges AM. Aprotocol for safe anaesthe­sia for cleft lip and cleft palate surgery in developing countries. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 436-441.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.8. Malam ed SF, TriegerN. Intra oral m axillary nerve block: an anatomical and clinical study. Anesth Prog 1983; 3(1:44-48.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.9. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. Apost anaesthetic recovery score. AnaesthAnalg 1970; 49:924-34.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.10. Soliman TB, Patel RI. Recovery scores do not correlate with postoperative hypoxaemia. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:53-56.  Back to cited text no. 10      
11.11. Chung F. Are discharge criteria changing? J C1inAnesth 1992; 5: 645-689.  Back to cited text no. 11      
12.12. Carnet' S, Kim A. Post anaesthesia recovery score re­vised. J C1inAnesth 1995; 7:89-91.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.13. McGrath PJ, Cunningham SJ, Goodman JT, Unruh A. The clinical measurement of pain in children: a review. Clin JPain 1986;1:221-7.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.14. Detriche O, Berre J. The Brussels Sedation Scale: Use of a simple clinical scale can avoid excessive sedation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the In­tensive Care Unit. Br JAnaesth 1999; 83: 698-701.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.15. Giaufre E, Dalens B, Gombert A. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children - a one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (ADARPEF). AnesthAnalg 1996;83:904-912.  Back to cited text no. 15      
16.16. Dalens BJ, Murat I, Murrell D. The safety of epidurals placed during general anesthesia [editorial]. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 1998; 23:433-438.  Back to cited text no. 16      
17.17. Schug SA, Fry R. Continuous regional analgesia in com­parison to systemic opioid administration for postop­erative pain control. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 528-532.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.18. Santhanam S, Barcelona SL, Young NM, Seligman I, Heffner CL. Postoperative pain relief in children under­going tympanom astoid surgery: Is a regional block bet­ter than opioid? Anesth Analg 2002 ; 94:859-862.  Back to cited text no. 18      
19.19. Heiket R, Rowly CL. A comparative study of 0.25% ropivacaine with 0.25% sbupivacaine for brachial plexus block. AnesthAnalg 1992 ; 78:602-6.  Back to cited text no. 19      
20.20. LewisN. The needle is like an animal: how children view injections. ChildToday 1978; 7:18-21.  Back to cited text no. 20      
21.21. Bailey PL. The use of opioids in anesthesia is not espe­cially associated with or predictive of postoperative hypoxaemia. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:1235.  Back to cited text no. 21      
22.22. Moore KL, Da11eyAF,AgurAMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy, Fifth ed. Philadelphia Lippincott Williams& Wilkins;2005. p.1000.  Back to cited text no. 22      
23.23. Xue FS, An G, Tong SY, Liao X, Liu JH, Luo LK. Influ­ence of surgical technique on early postoperative hypoxaem is in children undergoing elective palatoplasty. Br JAnaesth 1998; 80:447-451.  Back to cited text no. 23      
24.24. Hug CC, McClain DA. Pharmacodynamics of opiates. Boston: Little Brown 1884; 22:75-94.  Back to cited text no. 24      
25.25. Rose JIB, Watcha MT. Postoperative nausea and vomit­ing in pediatric patients. Br JAnaesthl999; 83:104-117.  Back to cited text no. 25      


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2111    
    Printed119    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded388    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal