Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1511  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 479-480 Table of Contents     

Cannot ventilate, Can we intubate?

Department of Anaesthesiology, Bharti Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune - 411 043, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication9-Oct-2010

Correspondence Address:
Sarita Sutrayya Swami
I2/5, Rajyog, Off Sinhgad Road, Lagad Mala, Behind Lokmat Office, Pune - 411 041
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.71025

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Swami SS, Aphale SS, Bapat S. Cannot ventilate, Can we intubate?. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:479-80

How to cite this URL:
Swami SS, Aphale SS, Bapat S. Cannot ventilate, Can we intubate?. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Mar 29];54:479-80. Available from:


Cannot ventilate, can we intubate? This question arose in our mind when we saw a neonate in NICU with big oral mass, diagnosed as congenital epulis.

Congenital epulis is a well-known lesion arising from the alveolar ridge in newborns. Histologically it is a granular cell tumour, [1] usually not associated with other major congenital anomalies except polydactyly and neurofibromatosis. [2]

This tumour is also called as 'Neumann's tumour' as was described by him first in 1871. [2] Prenatal diagnosis of epulis has been reported in the medical literature. [3]

A 3 day old preterm female neonate weighing 1.9 kg, delivered vaginally at 36 weeks of pregnancy, presented to us with a large mass, occupying oral cavity [Figure 1] with difficulty in breast feeding; there was neither stridor nor respiratory embarrassment. This baby was scheduled for surgical excision of mass with primary diagnosis as congenital epulis.
Figure 1: Mass occupying oral cavity

Click here to view

After thorough preoperative examination and investigations which were within normal limits, baby was accepted as ASA grade II, an appropriate consent was taken. Due to big oral mass protruding outside the mouth, we could not ventilate with the mask. Therefore we did awake laryngoscopy with assistant displacing the mass; we could visualize the larynx easily. After pre-oxygenation with larger size mask, inhalational induction with sevoflurane was attempted. Once the baby became quiet, laryngoscopy was done carefully with an assistant gently displacing the mass. Laryngoscopy revealed a good view of vocal cords and trachea was intubated with un-cuffed ETT no. 3 successfully [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Neonate with ET tube in situ

Click here to view

K. S. Canavan-Holliday and R. A. Lawson [2] also reported similar method of induction i.e. by spontaneous ventilation with halothane 0.5% and oxygen. They intubated baby on spontaneous ventilation with a Miller laryngoscope blade with an assistant gently pulling the epulis aside.

Merrett S.J., Crawford P.J. [4] reported that the excision of small masses of epulides under local anaesthesia. In our case, we decided for general anaesthesia and securing the airway by ETT in view of possibility of oral bleeding and aspiration.

Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen + nitrous oxide and sevoflurane using Jackson Ree's circuit, inj. vecuronium was used as muscle relaxant and fentanyl as analgesic. No significant bleeding was observed.

After excision of mass, there was no residual deformity and mouth opening of patient was absolutely normal [Figure 3]. Therefore, after reversal with inj. neostigmine and glycopyrrolate baby was extubated uneventfully.
Figure 3: Post operative image of oral cavity

Click here to view

In conclusion, epulis presents as a real challenge to anaesthesiologist for mask ventilation but intubation is possible as these masses have small pedicles and can be displaced during laryngoscopy. Assessment of an airway is mandatory for better airway control and safe endotracheal intubation. Prior to anaesthetising such babies we should also keep in mind remote possibility of surgical airway if required as a last life-saving measure as ventilation is difficult.

   References Top

1.Senoo H, Iida S, Kishino M, Namba N, Aikawa T, Kogo M. Solitory congenital granular cell lesion of tongue. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e45-8.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Canavan-Holliday KS, Lawson RA. Anaesthetic management of new born with multiple congenital epulides. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:742-4.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Thoma V, Idrissi B, Kohler M, Becmeur F, Viville B, Favre R. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital epulis. A case study. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006;21:321-5.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Merrett SJ, Crawford PJ. Congenital epulis of the new born - a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:127-9.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded389    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal