Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 3764  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 546-551 Table of Contents     

Efficacy of stellate ganglion block with an adjuvant ketamine for peripheral vascular disease of the upper limbs


Department of Anesthesia, D.Y. Patil Medical College, Kolhapur, Maharashta, India

Date of Web Publication22-Nov-2010

Correspondence Address:
Kalpana R Kulkarni
1168, "Chaitanya" A-5, Takala Square, Kolhapur - 416 006, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.72645

Rights and Permissions
 

Stellate ganglion block (STGB) is commonly indicated in painful conditions like reflex sympathetic dystrophy, malignancies of head and neck, Reynaud's disease and vascular insufficiency of the upper limbs. The sympathetic blockade helps to relieve pain and ischaemia. Diagnostic STGB is usually performed with local anaesthetics followed by therapeutic blockade with steroids, neurolytic agents or radiofrequency ablation of ganglion. There is increasing popularity and evidence for the use of adjuvants like opioid, clonidine and N Methyl d Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist - ketamine - for the regional and neuroaxial blocks. The action of ketamine with sympatholytic block is through blockade of peripherally located NMDA receptors that are the target in the management of neuropathic pain, with the added benefit of counteracting the "wind-up" phenomena of chronic pain. We studied ketamine as an adjuvant to the local anaesthetic for STGB in 20 cases of peripheral vascular disease of upper limbs during the last 5 years at our institution. STGB was given for 2 days with 2 ml of 2% lignocaine + 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by block with the addition of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine for three consecutive days. There was significant pain relief of longer duration with significant rise in hand temperature. We also observed complete healing of the gangrenous fingers in 17/19 patients.

Keywords: Ketamine, peripheral vascular disease, stellate ganglion block


How to cite this article:
Kulkarni KR, Kadam AI, Namazi IJ. Efficacy of stellate ganglion block with an adjuvant ketamine for peripheral vascular disease of the upper limbs. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:546-51

How to cite this URL:
Kulkarni KR, Kadam AI, Namazi IJ. Efficacy of stellate ganglion block with an adjuvant ketamine for peripheral vascular disease of the upper limbs. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 17];54:546-51. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2010/54/6/546/72645


   Introduction Top


The sympathetic supply to the head, neck and upper limb is derived from T1-9 segments, and passes through the stellate ganglion (C5-T1). The stellate ganglion is 2.5 cm x 1 cm x 0.5 cm and lies over the neck of the 1 st rib, between C7 and T1. The most common approach for stellate ganglion block (STGB) is paratracheal, at the level of C6 th Chassaignac's tubercle. [1],[2] In 1930, efficacy of STGB was well established by White in USA and Leriche in Europe. In 1933, Labat and Greene reported that injection of 33.3% alcohol can produce satisfactory analgesia. In 1936, Putnam and Hompton first used phenol for neurolysis. [3]

Besides chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), sympathetic blockade is found to be useful in circulatory problems of the upper limbs, such as arterial embolism, accidental intra-arterial injection of drugs and Meniere's syndrome. It has been indicated as immediate therapy for pulmonary embolism. [4],[5] Repeated injections of STGB has become popular for the long-term remissions that it produces in CRPS. Serial blocks disorganize the reflex activity triggered in the internunceal neuronal pool of the spinal cord and in the sympathetics themselves. [6] The sympathetic blockade produces relaxation of the upper extremity arteries, which increases blood flow and peripheral temperature. [7],[8] Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) of the upper limbs may be due to generalized atherosclerosis, thromboembolism, Buerger's disease, diabetic angiopathy or Reynaud's disease. Gradual ischaemia of nerves and tissues activates the sympathetic system, leading to the vicious cycle of pain-vasospasm-ischaemia-gangrene. Treatment is multimodal, with initial trials of alpha blockers, calcium antagonists, pentoxifylline or platelet inhibitors, especially when the obstruction results from spasm. Following failure of the primary line of treatment, patients are usually referred for sympathetic blocks with radiofrequency (RF) electrical thermocoagulation /chemical neurolysis of the ganglion.

Due to non-availability/affordability of RF ablation and to avoid the potential complications of chemical neurolysis, we decided to study the efficacy of ketamine as an adjuvant in enhancing the effects of STGB. Ketamine is known to manipulate the NMDA receptors that trigger the aberrant brain activity in neuropathic pain and control the autonomic dysregulation. [9] Besides good analgesia, it has got a local anaesthetic effect by blocking the Na-channel. [10] At low doses (0.1-0.5 mg/kg) of ketamine, psychotrophic effects are less, and can be managed with benzodiazepines. [11] Considering the fact that opioids have a limited role in established neuropathic pain and for its potential complications, [12] we felt ketamine to be a rational adjuvant for STGB. This report presents the result of 20 cases of PVD of upper limbs with gangrene of fingers, treated by serial STGB for 5 days with local anaesthetic (LA) and ketamine.


   Methods Top


A prospective analytical study was performed in 20 patients of PVD of upper limbs during the last 5 years. Approval by the institutional ethical committee and informed consent were obtained. The chief complaints were severe throbbing pain with cold fingers and dry gangrene of 8 days to 1 month duration. Patients were thoroughly assessed and investigated. Laser Doppler flowmetry of the affected extremity was carried out. Patients with h/o recent myocardial infarction /heart blocks and with International normalized ratio (INR) >1.5 were excluded. Pre-block vital parameters, temperature of the normal and affected hand and visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain were recorded. Diagnostic STGB was carried out with local anaesthetic for 2 days. Patients having pain relief of 50% in the initial magnitude and increase in temperature of the affected hand by 1.5C were subjected to therapeutic sympatholysis with ketamine. Pre-medication with intravenous midazolam 0.5 mg/kg was given for anxiolysis.

Technique

For classical anterior paratracheal approach at C-6 th level, patient was lying supine with extension of head at the A-O joint and mouth partially open so as to relax the muscles in the neck [Figure 1]. After skin preparation, the chassaignac's tubercle was palpated at the level of the cricoid cartilage (1.5 cm from midline) and the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the carotid vessels were retracted with one hand. Under C-arm guidance, a 21 G 5-cm needle was inserted perpendicular to the table to hit the C-6 th tubercle approximately at a depth of 2-2.5 cm. The needle withdrawn for 2 mm to prevent periosteal or injection into the longus colli muscles. After -ve aspiration test, lignocaine 2% 2 ml+8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected in increments. Monitoring of vital parameters during the block, after the block for 30 min and, later, hourly for 4 h was carried out in the recovery room. The block was repeated in a similar way on the 2 nd day to confirm the benefits. Later, for three successive days, STGB was repeated with 1.5 ml of 2% lignocaine +8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine +0.5 mg/kg of ketamine. Intramuscular Diclofenac 2 mg/kg or Tramadol 2 mg/kg was given as soon as VAS reached >6.
Figure 1: Technique of stellate ganglion block

Click here to view


Clinical observations

  1. For pain relief - (0-10 point) VAS 2-hourly for 8 h and later 4-hourly up to16 h and at 24 h.
  2. Baseline axillary temperature and temperature of the affected hand before and after block, then 2-hourly for 8 h, later 4-hourly up to16 h and at 24 h.
  3. S/O improved circulation - vasodilatation, skin texture and colour.
  4. Horner's syndrome.
  5. Immediate complications like hoarseness, weakness in the limb, respiratory insufficiency, etc.
  6. Weekly follow-up for 1 month, then monthly for 6 months and later 6-monthly for pain relief, sense of warmth, appearance of line of demarcation, healing of gangrenous lesion and return of peripheral pulsations.
  7. For any delayed complications.


Statitistical analysis of the data is performed using data analysis Tool Park in Microsoft Excel. As the sample size of the study group is 20, analysis of the quantitative data is carried out using Student's unpaired "t"-test for unequal variance, for comparison of mean VAS score, temperature, duration of analgesia, pulse rate and mean blood pressure. Differences are considered as statistically significant if probability (P-value) is <0.05 and as highly significant if P<0.001, whereas probability of >0.05 is considered as insignificant. Level of significance is 0.001, 0.01 and 0.05, as appropriate. Power of the test is almost 1 whereever it is significant.


   Results Top


STGB was performed on 20 patients (M/F=19/1) of age 25-65 years, weighing 40-70 kg. The affecting pathologies are mentioned in [Table 1].
Table 1: Pre-STGB observations


Click here to view


[Figure 2] depicts the mean pre-block values of days 1 and 2, where the mean VAS was 7 and the mean surface temperature of the hand was 29.89C. Following STGB with LA, the mean Post-block VAS was 4.25, with a significant rise in the mean temperature of the affected hand by 0.77C. (P<0.001). The mean duration of analgesia observed was 7 h. Later, the STGB was performed for three successive days with LA+ketamine 0.5 mg/kg. The pre-block mean VAS of days 3, 4 and 5 was 4.7 whereas the post-block mean VAS was 1.6, which was significantly less. The temperature rise obtained was mean 1.73C. Duration of analgesia was significantly more after the addition of ketamine, with a mean of 14 h (P<0.001). There was no significant variation in the mean pulse rate (PR) and mean blood pressure (MBP) before and after block following STGB and with the addition of ketamine.
Figure 2: Comparisons of the mean pre- and post-block VAS, temp. and duration of analgesia (h). Comparisons of the mean pre- and post-block PR/min and MBP on days 1 and 2 and days 3, 4 and 5 of STGB

Click here to view


[Figure 3] shows the comparison of the mean VAS of days 1 and 2 (STGB with LA) vs the mean VAS of days 3, 4 and 5 (STGB with adjuvant ketamine). It refers to the VAS record pre and post-block at 2, 6, 12, 16 and 24 h. The pre-block mean (SD) VAS of days 1 and 2 was 7 (0.96); following STGB, it was 2.67 (0.43) and 3.2 (0.6) at 2 and 6 h, which was highly significant (P<0.001). At 12 and 16 h, there was significant rise in VAS as 6.7 (0.9) and 6.8 (1.2), respectively, following LA block (P>0.05). However, the pre-block VAS of days 3, 4 and 5 achieved was mean (SD) 4.67 (0.7). There was a significant drop in the VAS record as 1.62 (0.73), 1.23 (0.68), 1.39 (0.5) and 2.22 (0.78) at 2, 6, 12 and 16 h, respectively, and it was highly significant (P<0.001).
Figure 3: Comparision of the mean VAS after STGB with LA vs addition with ketamine at 2, 6, 12, 16 and 24 h

Click here to view


[Figure 4] shows the mean post-block temperature rise following STGB with LA on days 1 and 2 and after addition of ketamine on days 3, 4 and 5. It refers to the pre-block mean (SD) temperature of the hand of days 1 and 2, which was 29.89 (1.15)C. The rise was highly significant at 2, 6 and 12 h, with a significant rise maintained at 16 h following LA block. On days 3, 4 and 5, the pre-block mean temperature achieved was 32.1 (1.23)C. The mean rise in temperature observed was highly significant at 2, 6, 12 and 16 h following addition of ketamine for STGB.
Figure 4: Mean temperature changes in °C in mean of days 1 and 2 and days 3, 4 and 5 at 2, 6, 12, 16 and 24 h

Click here to view


[Table 2] shows the follow-up record at different times for pain relief, warmth and healing of the gangrenous fingers. Hundred percent pain relief was present at the 12 th week in (18/20) 94.7% of the patients. Later, few patients were lost to follow-up (LF) from 6 to 24 months. Warmth in the hand was maintained in (19/20) 95% of the cases. Greater than 90% healing of the fingers was observed in (18/19) 94.7% of the patients at the 12 th week. The STGB was repeated in two cases, but a diabetic case required amputation of the 2 phalynx at 8 th week due to poor response. Repeat Doppler flow study was not possible in all the cases. At 6 months, 17 patients underwent laser Doppler flowmetry, showing improvement in flow from 50% to 90%. At 24 months, 10 patients had 50-100% improvement in the circulation of the hand.
Table 2: Follow-up record of % of pain relief, warmth and healing in number of patients,amputation done, no. of lost to follow-up (LF) cases and % of success


Click here to view


[Table 3] shows that there was transient Horner's in 12 patients and hoarseness in six patients, which did not require any intervention. Haematoma formation occurred in one case, which subsided after 12 h. Bradycardia occurred in two patients, which responded to 0.2 mg of injection glycopyrrolate. Sixteen patients complained of light-headedness for 10-30 min, which was tolerable following midazolam pre-medication.
Table 3: Post-STGB complications in 20 patients


Click here to view



   Discussion Top


STGB is a well-accepted therapeutic technique. Wolf et al. observed incidence of minor and short-lived complications in 1.7/1,000 patients, with no major complications in the series of 45,000 cases. [13] The local anaesthetic blocks provide immediate relief but they are not long lasting. Permanent relief may be obtained with repeated blocks using depo-steroids (5-7 times) or with neurolytic agents. The local anaesthetic interrupts the pain-spasm cycle whereas corticosteroids cause membrane stabilization and inhibition of the synthesis/release of pro-inflammatory substances. [14]

Racz et al. advocated the injection of 3% phenol (2.5 ml of 6% phenol, 2.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 80 mg of methylprednisolone) at the stellate ganglion level via the C7 approach under fluoroscopy. They have not observed any long-term Horner's syndrome. [15] Harris et al. in 2006 reported profound pain relief following local application with buprenorphine at the stellate ganglion for head and face pain, supporting the presence of endogenous opioids on sympathetic ganglion. [16] For long-term effects unlike neurolysis of the lumbar sympathetic chain, many clinicians have avoided neurolysis of the stellate ganglion for the risk of producing permanent Horner's or complications due to spread of neurolytic solution. [1] For prolonged effects, addition of 40 mg of triamcinalone or fentanyl has been advocated. [5],[17] Alternatively, RF denervation has been performed at the stellate ganglion to diminish the chance of a permanent Horner's syndrome. [1],[5] However, post-lesioning, neuritis/neuralgias are observed in 10% of the cases and permanent Horner's or motor paralysis is also reported. [3],[17]

Many opioid and non-opioid drugs are tried by different routes to treat chronic pain syndromes. [18] Among them, a NMDA receptor antagonist - ketamine - has gained popularity for variety of its action by multiple routes. In CRPS, the peripheral sensitization of pain with persistent inputs to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord from the C fibres causes the "Wind Up" phenomena. [19],[20] The change is either decrease in the inhibitory receptors like GABA or increase in the excitatory receptors like NMDA. [21]

For neuropathic pain, ketamine is reported to be helpful in a dose range of 0.1-7 mg/kg and by infusion for 30 min to 8 h in both CRPS Type I/II patients. [22] Long-term pain relief is observed in CRPS following low-dose infusion for few days with minimal haemodynamic or psychomimetic side-effects. [23]

PVD of the upper limbs present with either acute intractable or chronic ischaemic pain, with discolouration and gangrene of the fingers. To achieve prolonged sympathetic blockade for pain relief and to maintain circulation for healing, ketamine appears to be a good adjuvant for STGB. Its action may be supraspinal by systemic absorption and peripheral through NMDA receptors located on the somatic nerve and dorsal root ganglion. Blockade of peripherally located NMDA receptors is a potential target in the management of neuropathic pain due to vascular insufficiency as well. [24] As there are changes in Na + and Ca 2+ channels in neuropathic pain, a combination of a Na + channel blocker (local anaesthetic) and NMDA receptor antagonists appears to be rational for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The effect of opioid is decreased in patients with neuropathic pain. [25] Ketamine, on the other hand, is effective after the onset of hyperalgesic symptoms. [21]

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of ketamine with STGB. For the first 2 days, STGB was given with 10 ml of local anaesthetic. The mean pre-block VAS score was 7 and post-block score attained at 6 h was 3.2, which was significantly less. Following block with the LA agents, duration of analgesia (time from STGB to first request of analgesics at VAS >6) noted was 7 h (mean of days 1 and 2). After the first record of duration of analgesia, patients received intramuscular Diclofenac 2 mg/kg or Tramadol 2 mg/kg as soon as VAS reached >6. For the first 2 days, intensity of pain was higher in spite of parenteral analgesics. Later, for three successive days, STGBs with the addition of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine resulted in a pre-block mean VAS of days 3, 4 and 5 of 4.7, showing better response to the parenteral analgesics, and the post-block VAS attained was 1.2 with significantly prolonged duration of analgesia of mean 14 h. The results were similar to the observations noted by Rani sunder et al.,[24] who observed a fall in VAS from 10 to 2.5 with STGB with bupivacaine and VAS <1 following addition of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine for STGB, with duration of analgesia of 36 h in two cases of CRPS. One of our case of CRPS had dramatic reduction in the oedema of the hand within 24 h after single ketamine block. The temperature rise observed following STGB with LA was 1.6C. and of 2.7C. with the addition of ketamine. Temperature rise of >1.5C. was observed following successful sympatheticolysis. [26],[27],[28] There are clinical reports of pre-emptive STGB to increase the patency of radial artery grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery [29] and as an indication for the treatment of refractory angina. [30] There are few studies to demonstrate the effect of ketamine on microcirculation when added to sympathetic blockade with LA agents. Probably because of prolonged analgesia due to NMDA antagonism and enhancement of the LA effect by action on Na channels, ketamine helps to maintain the vasodilatation/flow induced by serial STGB. This has resulted in 90% pain relief by the 3 rd week in 17 patients and 100% pain relief in 15 patients over 4 weeks duration and also accelerated healing of the gangrenous fingers, as observed in 18/19 patients.


   Conclusion Top


STGB using local anaesthetic with an adjuvant ketamine is a safe and effective technique. Ketamine enhances the effect of sympathetic blockade with relief of pain, ischaemia and maintains circulation. Thus, ketamine is a useful adjuvant to STGB and it obviates the need of permanent destruction of the ganglion by chemical/RF neurolysis in patients with PVD.

 
   References Top

1.Rauck RL. Stellate ganglion block. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management. Vol. 5. New York: W.B. Saunders Company; 2001. p. 88-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Bonica JJ. Sympathetic nerve blocks for pain diagnosis and therapy. Vol. 1. New York: Breon Laboratories; 1980. p. 27-38.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Rowe DS. Neurolytic techniques for pain management. Pain Clin 1995;8:107-15.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Zapp M. Somatic and Sympathetic Nerve Blockade. Florida: Jacksonville Medicine; 1998. Available from: http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/1998journals/.../somatic.htm [last accessed on 2008].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Raj P. Stellate ganglion block. In: Waldman, Winnie, editors. Interventional pain management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996. p. 269.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Hogan QH, Abram SE. Neural Blockade for Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review. Anesthesiology 1997;86:216-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Rogowski J, Mrozinski P, Jagielak D, Lango R, Narkiewicz M, Wujtewicz M. Thermographic assessment of stellate ganglion block effectiveness during cardiosurgical procedures. Med Sci Monit 2000;6:407-10.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Zenz M, Tryba M, Horch C. Sympathetic block after plexus anesthesia. Comparison with stellate ganglion block. Reg Anaesth 1986;9: 84-87.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Goldberg ME, Domsky R, Scaringe D, Hirsh R, Dotson J, Sharaf I, et al. Multi-day low dose ketamine infusion for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Physician 2005;8:175-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Wagner L, Gingrich K, Kulli J, Yang J. Ketamine blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels: Evidence for a shared receptor site with local anesthetics. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1406-13.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Elia N, Tramθr M. Ketamine and postoperative pain-a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 2005;113:61-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Arner S, Meyerson BA. Lack of analgesic effect of opioids in neuropathic pain and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain 1988;33:11-23.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Wulf H, Maier CH. Complications of stellate ganglion blockade: Results of a survey. Anesthetist 1992;41:146-51.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Manchikanti L, Singh V, Kloth D, Slipman CW, Jasper JF, Trescot AM, et al. Interventional Techniques in the Management of Chronic Pain. Pain physician 2000;3:7-42.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Rauck R. (Racz G, et al: Personal communication,1998). Sympathetic Nerve Blocks: Head, Neck and Trunk. In: Raj PP, Practical Management of Pain. 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2000. P. 651-82.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Harris CL, Hamid B, Rosenquist RW, Schultz-Stubner SH. Ganglionic Local Opioid Application (GLOA) for Treatment of Chronic Headache And Facial Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:460-2.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Marples IL, Atkinson RE. Stellate Ganglion Block. Pain Rev 2001;8:3-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Saxena AK, Arava SK. Current concepts in neuroaxial administration of opiods and non-opiods: An overview and future perspectives. Indian J Anaesth 2004;48:13-24.  Back to cited text no. 18
  Medknow Journal  
19.Bridges D, Thompson SW, Rice AS. Mechanism of neuropathic pain. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:12-26.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Lunch M, Clark A, Sawynok J, Sullivan M. Topical amitriptyline and ketamine in neuropathic pain syndromes: An open-label study. J Pain 2005;6:644-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Warncke T, Stubhaug A, Jψrum E. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor anatagonist, suppresses spatial and temporal properties of burn-induced secondary hyperalgesia in man: A double blinded, cross over comparison with morphine and placebo. Pain 1997;72:99-106.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Shirani P, Salamone AR, Schulz P. Ketamine treatment for intractable pain in a patient with severe refractory complex regional pain syndrome: A Case Report. Pain Physician 2008;11:339-42.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Sigtermans MJ, Van Hilten JJ, Bauer MC, Arbous MS, Marinus J, Sarton EY, et al. Ketamine produces effective and long-term pain relief in patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1. Pain 2009;145:271-2.   Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Sunder RA, Toshniwal G, Dureja GP. Ketamine as an adjuvant in sympathetic blocks for management of central sensitization following peripheral nerve injury. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2008;3:22. Available from: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 [Last accessed on 2010].  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Arner S, Meyerson BA. Lack of analgesic effect of opioids in neuropathic pain and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain 1988;33:11-23.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Schόrmann M, Gradl G, Wizgal I, Tutic M, Moser C, Azad S, et al. Clinical and Physiologic Evaluation of Stellate Ganglion Blockade for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I. Clin J Pain 2001;17:94-100.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Malmqvist EL, Bengtsson M, Sφrensen J. Efficacy of stellate ganglion block: A clinical study with bupivacaine. Reg Anesth 1992;17:340-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Stevens RA, Stotz A, Kao TC, Powar M, Burgess S, Kleinman B. The relative increase in skin temperature after stellate ganglion block is predictive of a complete sympathectomy of the hand. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998;23:266-70.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Yildrim V, Akay HT, Bingol H, Bolcal C, Iyem H, Doganci S, et al. Pre-emptive stellate ganglion block increases the patency of radial artery grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007;51:434-40. Available from: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378781. [Last accessed on 2010].  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Chester M, Hammond C, Leach A. Long-term benefits of stellate ganglion block in severe chronic refractory angina. Pain 2000;87:103-5.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 Tramadol sparing effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant with lignocaine in preoperative stellate ganglion block for postoperative pain relief following upper limb surgeries
Deepak Thapa,Deepanshu Dhiman,Vanita Ahuja,Satinder Gombar,Ravi K Gupta
British Journal of Pain. 2018; 12(1): 26
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Ketamine versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in the peribulbar block for vitreoretinal surgeries: Randomized controlled study
Sameh Abdelkhalik Ahmed,Mohamad Gamal Elmawy,Mohammed Awd
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Stellate Ganglion Block for Painful Congenital Venous Malformation of the Arm
Adam Woo,Liza Tharakan,Razvan Vargulescu
Pain Practice. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Sympathetic ganglion transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves femoral blood flow and exercise tolerance
Gerson Cipriano,J. Alberto Neder,Daniel Umpierre,Ross Arena,Paulo J. C. Vieira,Adriana M. Gntzel Chiappa,Jorge P. Ribeiro,Gaspar R. Chiappa
Journal of Applied Physiology. 2014; 117(6): 633
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Ultrasound Guided Stellate Ganglion Block in Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Comparison of Ketamine versus Morphine as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine
Ola T. Abdel Dayem,Mostafa M. Saeid,Olfat M. Ismail,Adel M. El Badrawy,Nevert A. Abdel Ghaffar
Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014; 2014: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Adjuvants to local anaesthetics in regional anaesthesia - should they be used? Part II: Cons
Ghansham Biyani,Anjolie Chhabra,Dalim Kumar Baidya
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Adjuvants to local anaesthetics in regional anaesthesia - should they be used? Part I: Pros
Ghansham Biyani,Anjolie Chhabra,Dalim Kumar Baidya,Rahul Kumar Anand
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Stellate ganglion block as an early intervention in sympathetically maintained headache and orofacial pain caused by temporal arteritis
Noma, N. and Kamo, H. and Nakaya, Y. and Dezawa, K. and Young, A. and Khan, J. and Imamura, Y.
Pain Medicine (United States). 2013; 14(3): 392-397
[Pubmed]
9 Stellate Ganglion Block as an Early Intervention in Sympathetically Maintained Headache and Orofacial Pain Caused by Temporal Arteritis
Noboru Noma,Hiroshi Kamo,Yuka Nakaya,Ko Dezawa,Andrew Young,Junad Khan,Yoshiki Imamura
Pain Medicine. 2013; 14(3): 392
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Introduction
    Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4329    
    Printed118    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded539    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal