Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1450  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 201-202  

Indigenous coated needle for nerve block


Department of Anaesthesiology, GR Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication22-Apr-2011

Correspondence Address:
Dilip Kothari
Department of Anaesthesiology, 2-A, JA Hospital Campus, Lashkar, Gwalior 474 009
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.79874

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kothari D, Agrawal J, Mehrotra A. Indigenous coated needle for nerve block. Indian J Anaesth 2011;55:201-2

How to cite this URL:
Kothari D, Agrawal J, Mehrotra A. Indigenous coated needle for nerve block. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 May 24];55:201-2. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2011/55/2/201/79874

Sir,

Success rate of any nerve block highly depends upon precise localization of the nerve, which also reduces the amount of local anaesthetic agent required. Elicitation of paraesthesia with or without the use of nerve locator, [1] and recently the aid of ultrasound [2] are in use for exact localization of nerve.

Injury to nerve, multiple pricks, large amount of local anaesthetic, and high incidence of incomplete block are the main disadvantages of elicitation of paraesthesia technique, [3] whereas the high cost and expertise to use the ultrasound machine are the main deterrent factors for its routine use.

Although conventional needle has been used in the past, [4] but uncoated needle for nerve block are not reliable and safe because applied current is dispersed all over giving inaccurate localization. In contrast coated needle requires a low threshold current because current density focuses mainly at the tip. [5] Modified tuohy needle [6] too has been used for continuous plexus block, but big size needle and difficult sterilization by ethylene oxide are the main disadvantages to its use.

Due to high cost and unavailability of teflon or polymer-coated needles in our hospital, we were in search of a cost-effective alternative. We tried intravenous cannula but application of the current probe was a problem because of full-length teflon coating.

We made an indigenous version with two locally available intravenous cannula (KETHIN TM ) size 18 and 20 SWG [Figure 1]. Under all sterile condition stylet of size 18 cannula was inserted into size 20 outer Teflon sheath with a gentle force. Due to this force teflon sheath gets detached from its junction at wings (point A), if not then we made a cut at this junction with a sterile blade so the sheath advances tightly on bigger size stylet leaving approximately 2-3 cm of bare area over metal stylet (between point A and B, respectively ) where we attached crocodile clip of nerve locator. Then with a sterile surgical blade we removed excess teflon sheath at bevel level to leave the tip bare [Figure 2].
Figure 1: SWG 20 outer teflon sheath and SWG 18 metal stylet of conventional intravenous cannula

Click here to view
Figure 2: Indigenously prepared coated needle for nerve block along with crocodile nerve locator clamp at bare area between two arrows

Click here to view


This version cost us approximately INR 30-35 (0.5-0.7 Euro) only, whereas the coated needles in market costs approximately INR 500-800 (8-14 Euro). We have been using it regularly for last 6 months with accurate and safe localization of supraclavicular brachial plexus giving good success rate.

 
   References Top

1.Sia S, Bartoli M, Lepri A, Marchini O, Ponsecchi P. Multiple injection axillary plexus block: A comparison of two methods of nerve localization nerve stimulation versus paraesthesia. Anaesth Analg 2000;91:647-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:7-17.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Kaufman BR, Nystrom E, Nath S, Foucher G, Nystrom A. Debilitating chronic pain syndromes after presumed intraneural injections. Pain 2000;85:283-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Furukawa M, Nakagawa K, Hamada T. Brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator and a conventional needle. Osaka City Med J 1994;40:27-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Balavenkatsubramanian J. Continuous peripheral nerve block.The future of regional anaesthesia. Ind J Anaesth 2008;52:506-16.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Kulkurni AH. A Modification of Tuohy Needle for continuous plexus blockade. Ind J Anaesth 2009;53:374-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Design and use of nerve stimulator needle-a novel technique
A. C. Manjunath,S. Shivanna,V. S. Pujari,C. A. Tejesh
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2011; 55(10): 1285
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Design and use of nerve stimulator needle-a novel technique
Manjunath, A.C., Shivanna, S., Pujari, V.S., Tejesh, C.A.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2011; 55(10): 1285-1286
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1968    
    Printed61    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded315    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal