Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 2662  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
EDITORIAL
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 215-218  

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and epidural anaesthesia


Department of Anaesthesia, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jul-2012

Correspondence Address:
S S Harsoor
Department of Anaesthesia, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.98757

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Harsoor S S, Sudheesh K. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and epidural anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:215-8

How to cite this URL:
Harsoor S S, Sudheesh K. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and epidural anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 18];56:215-8. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2012/56/3/215/98757

Neuraxial blocks after several benefits over General Anaesthesia (GA) in surgical practice, due to their effect on endocrine and metabolic activity during perioperative period. They are also known to provide improved outcome with regard to intra operative complications like bleeding, [1],[2] high quality postoperative analgesia, greater patient comfort and reduced post-operative morbidity and mortality. [3] Few of the studies have shown reduction in Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)with neuraxial block compared to GA. [4] These distinct advantages and efficacy of these neuraxial techniques over GA force the anaesthetist to lean more in favor of these blocks, whenever possible. [5]

The team of experts appointed to establish a Nordic consensus on recommendations for best clinical practice, observed that there is a strong evidence to suggest that neuraxial blocks improve the patient comfort and reduce the post-operative morbidity and mortality. [6] Also, withholding perioperative epidural analgesia denies the patient, about the possible benefits such as early resolution of post-operative ileus, early ambulation, decreased vascular graft thrombosis, and decreased hospital stay among others. [7]

The Japanese study team observes that westernisation of food habits and increased expectancy of life all across the globe and specially in Japan, has led to increase in the risk of DVT and Pulmonary embolism (PE). [8] Their multicentre study revealed that perioperative DVT and PE following joint replacement surgeries and major abdominal surgeries was in the range of 3.36 and 4.41 per 10000 operations respectively. [8] The risk of PE following spine deformity surgery was estimated to be as high as 2.2% and it was not influenced by age, gender, intraoperative blood loss, operative time and number of fusion levels. [9]

The pathogenesis of DVT is multifactorial, which includes Virchow's triad of hypercoagulability, venous stasis and endothelial damage. [10] The patients with extended recumbence and limited mobility after major surgical procedure are at increased risk of DVT. [11]

Though there is a global alarm regarding the increased reporting of epidural hematoma, the real incidence in any part of the globe is really not well known. [11] It is an undeniable fact that any incidence of pulmonary embolism following DVT remains one of the commonest preventable causes of death in post-operative patients. [12] It is important to know that, there is a strong evidence which indicates the spinal bleeding is influenced by several other risk factors such as elderly patients, patients with hepatic and renal diseases, anatomical variations in spines and spinal canal vessels and subclinical haemostatic disorders including antihaemostatic drugs. [6] The other risk factors include traumatic epidural needle or catheter placement, and therapeutic levels of anticoagulation during catheter removal. [13]

The perioperative thromboprophylaxis measures include both mechanical and pharmacological methods. The mechanical thromboprophylaxis measures include compression stockings, bilateral intermittent pneumatic calf compression devices, and subsequent monitoring with duplex ultrasonography of lower limbs and when necessary even lung perfusion scintigraphy to confirm the diagnosis, so that appropriate treatment can be initiated when necessary. [14]

But the study by Kobayashi and others have revealed that mechanical prophylaxis is inadequate to prevent PE and they further suggested that, advanced thromboprophylaxis by anticoagulants is essential. [8]

But the administration of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients with cardiovascular diseases or peripheral vascular diseases is on the rise and is posing an everyday challenge to Anaesthesiologist, when administration of epidural analgesia is considered beneficial. [7] The wide spread use of central neuraxial block and equally high prevalence of anticoagulation methods in the perioperative period have led to an inevitable overlap of the two practices. [14]

The DVT and PE are considered as the most fearsome complications, in view of the high degree of morbidity and even mortality. The incidence of post-operative epidural hematoma is reported very rarely, thus leading to uncertainty of real versus perceived risk of this complication. Hence, the fear of epidural hematoma is one of the major disincentives to start pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in post-operative period. In the world literature, there is insufficient published data available to precisely set the evidence based guidelines. [11] Also the rarity of this complication makes the prospective randomised study very difficult and currently there is no laboratory model available to study this, [15] in addition to the ethical issues involved. Even the Angiologists believe that the available data certainly do not support the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, at least in identified low DVT risk group. Rather, individualised risk benefit assessment is needed in such patients. [12]

It should be realised that spontaneous Epidural hematomas can occur due to intrinsic problems, which appear as a clinically significant neurological deficiency, especially during concomitant thromboprophylaxis. The available evidence suggests a neurological deficiency is observed in 1:1,50,000 epidurals and 1:2,20.000 spinal anaesthetics. [15] This incidence is found to be about 1 in 2,00,000 in obstetric patients. [3]

A retrospective study of 306 vascular surgery patients continuously receiving clopidogrel, did not detect any incidence of neurological complications after epidural catheter placement. As this report is based on small sample size it cannot be considered as recommendation [7] and cautious approach may be desirable. But recent surveys are projecting very high incidences. The ever increasing use of anticoagulants either for pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, or as a post-operative thromboprophylaxis, are challenging the anaesthesiologists to update themselves with current guidelines, to minimise or avoid incidences of epidural hematoma and neurological complications.

Among Asian population, it is reported that, the incidence of perioperative DVT and PE undergoing hip surgeries is considered to be very low. [16]

The FDA approval of Low molecular weight Heparin (LMWH) in 1993 for perioperative thromboprophylaxis, no doubt has benefitted the patients with regard to PE, but it has also increased the perceived risk of epidural hematoma. The study by Neimark and others observed that prophylactic LMWH in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia is unnecessary due to higher risk of epidural hematoma. [17] It is presumed that a bleed from intrathecal space is likely to be less devastating due to cerebrospinal fluid dilution.

There are no laboratory tests that are generally accepted for preoperative testing of these patients receiving thromboprophylaxis. A normal bleeding time does not necessarily indicate normal platelet function and the contrary is also true. A normal prothombin time (PT) or International normalised ratio (INR) though used in patients on oral anticoagulants, they cannot be considered as the bench marks. The thromboelastography may be able to detect and quantify the effect of unfractionated heparin. [18]

Since minimal risk can never be same as elimination of risk, several issues like duration and reversibility of action of each drug, are to be considered before instituting a neuraxial block in anti-coagulated patients [Table 1]. Simultaneously, it does not appear ethical altogether to avoid a neuraxial technique, which can offer several advantages. Thus it is prudent to weigh the risk and benefits of neuraxial techniques and discuss them openly with the patients

The other options such as continuous peripheral nerve blocks can be used whenever possible. Any signs of spinal cord compression, such as severe back pain, progressive weakness or numbness of lower limbs, bladder and bowel dysfunction, in the post-operative period should warrant immediate attention. Probably a large multicentre prospective observational study to identify the incidence of epidural hematoma, in various ethnic groups may be beneficial.{Table 1}

 
   References Top

1.Colò F, Martinez López de Arroyabe B, Divella M. Neuraxial blocks and anticoagulant therapy. Minerva Anestesiol 2003;69:785-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Parker BM. Anesthetics and anesthesia techniques: Impacts on perioperative management and postoperative outcomes. Cleve Clin J Med 2006;73:Suppl 1:S13-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Gogarten W, Van Aken H. The use of anti-thrombotic drugs during various surgical procedures. Chirurg 2007;78:119-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Rosencher N, Noack H, Feuring M, Clemens A, Friedman RJ, Eriksson BI. Type of anaesthesia and the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or dabigatranetexilate in major orthopaedic surgery: Pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Thromb J 2012;10:9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Mentegazzi F, Danelli G, Ghisi D, Tosi M, Gennari A, Fanelli G. Locoregional anesthesia and coagulation. Minerva Anestesiol 2005;71:497-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Breivik H, Bang U, Jalonen J, Vigfússon G, Alahuhta S, Lagerkranser M. Nordic guidelines for neuraxial blocks in disturbed haemostasis from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:16-41.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Osta WA, Akbary H, Fuleihan SF. Epidural analgesia in vascular surgery patients actively taking clopidogrel. Br J Anaesth 2010;104:429-32.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Kobayashi T. Advancement of prophylaxis and therapy for venous thromboembolism. Rinsho Byori 2008;56:589-99.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Pateder DB, Gonzales RA, Kebaish KM, Antezana DF, Cohen DB, Chang JY, et al. Pulmonary embolism after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:301-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Lu N, Salvati EA. Multimodal prophylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty: Current perspectives. Chin J Traumatol 2010;13:362-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Glotzbecker MP, Bono CM, Wood KB, Harris MB. Post-operative spinal epidural hematoma: A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:E413-20.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Bauersachs RM, Haas S. Thromboprophylaxis-key points for the angiologist. Vasa 2009;38:135-45.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Horlocker TT. Thromboprophylaxis and neuraxial anaesthesia. Orthopedics 2003;26(2 Suppl):s243-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Yoshioka K, Kitajima I, Kabata T, Tani M, Kawahara N, Murakami H, et al. Venous thromboembolism after spine surgery: Changes of the fibrin monomer complex and D-dimer level during the perioperative period. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;13:594-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Horlocker TT, Wedel DJ, Rowlingson JC, Enneking FK, Kopp SL, Benzon HT, et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:64-101.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Tsuda K, Kawasaki T, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Natural course of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis in hip surgery without pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in an Asian population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2430-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Neĭmark MI, Zinovv'eva IE, Deev IT, Dicheskul ML, Smirnova OI, Momot AP. Effect of anaesthesia and anticoagulant prophylaxis on the occurrence of post-operative thromboembolic complications in orthopaedic patients.Anesteziol Reanimatol 2006:35-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Boyce H, Hume-Smith H, Ng J, Columb MO, Stocks GM. Use of thromboelastography to guide thromboprophylaxis after caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20:213-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]IndianJAnaesth_2012_56_3_215_98757_t1.jpg



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2643    
    Printed117    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1393    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal