Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 6127  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 217-218  

Safety of paediatric neuraxial blocks: Revisited


Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Centre, Pondicherry, India

Date of Web Publication15-May-2013

Correspondence Address:
Stalin Vinayagam
No: 2, 3rd Cross Street, Thilagar Nagar, Pondicherry - 605 009
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.111887

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Vinayagam S, Dhanger S. Safety of paediatric neuraxial blocks: Revisited. Indian J Anaesth 2013;57:217-8

How to cite this URL:
Vinayagam S, Dhanger S. Safety of paediatric neuraxial blocks: Revisited. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 11];57:217-8. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2013/57/2/217/111887

Sir,

We read with great interest the review article on recent developments in paediatric neuraxial blocks by Ponde. [1] We would like to congratulate the author for a detailed review on the safety and effectiveness of the recent advances in paediatric neuraxial blocks. We have certain concerns regarding some of the issues dealt by the author.

First, the author has described various recent advances to make caudal epidural a more safe and effective technique. We feel that the role of test dose needs to be highlighted which is a routine practice in our centre. Though there are controversies around its usefulness in anaesthetized children, this practice will make caudal epidural a more safe technique particularly in centres where ultrasound and electrostimulation is not available. A test dose of 0.1 ml/kg of local anesthetic solution with 5μg/ml of adrenaline to a maximal volume of 3 ml is usually recommended. A heart rate increase of 10 bpm, a systolic blood pressure increase of 15mmHg, a T-wave amplitude increase of greater than 25% from baseline indicates possible intravascular injection. [2]

Second, the author has recommended a dose of 0.8 ml/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in children, which is very high and also crosses the toxic limit. The maximum dose of bupivacaine recommended for regional anaesthesia is 2 mg/kg. A dose of 0.8 ml/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine is equivalent to 4 mg/kg, which is twice the toxic dose. This can lead to very high level of blockade and also increases the incidence of toxicity. Though the dose and volume of bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia varies with each institution, the recommended standard dose is shown in [Table 1]. [3] Bupivacaine toxicity can manifest as dysrhythmias with conduction block, widening of the QRS complex, torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia, or major cardiovascular collapse. [4] Bupivacaine can produce cardiac and central nervous system toxicity at serum concentrations of 2μg/ml in children.
Table 1: Recommended dose of bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in children[3]

Click here to view


Third, the author has mentioned ventricular shunts as absolute contraindication for spinal anaesthesia in children. We feel that neuraxial blocks can be safely given in children with ventricular shunts under an antibiotic coverage. Platis et al. also considers it acceptable to perform neuraxial block in children with shunt devices under protection of antibiotic prophylaxis. [5] Absolute contraindications for spinal anaesthesia in children include refusal of the parents, coagulation defects, infection at the site of insertion, true allergy to local anaesthetics, severe hypovolemia, progressive neurologic disease and uncontrolled convulsions. [6]

 
   References Top

1.Ponde VC. Recent developments in paediatricneuraxial blocks. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:470-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.Tobias JD. Caudal epidural block: A review of test dosing and recognition of systemic injection in children. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1156-61.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Dalens Bernard J. Regional Anaesthesia in Children. In: Miller RD, editor. Anaesthesia. 6 th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 2005. p. 1719-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.De La Coussaye JE, Brugada J, Allessie MA. Electrophysiologic and arrhythmogenic effects of bupivacaine. A study with high-resolution ventricular epicardial mapping in rabbit hearts. Anesthesiology 1992;77:132-41.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Platis CM, Kachko L, Livni G, Efrat R, Katz J. Caudal anesthesia in children with shunt devices. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:1198-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Goyal R, Jinjil K, Baj BB, Singh S, Kumar S. Paediatric Spinal Anesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2008;52:264-70.  Back to cited text no. 6
  Medknow Journal  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1009    
    Printed17    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded343    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal