Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 99  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 505-506  

Difficult extubation: A rare cause


S.P. Medical College and Allied Group of Hospitals, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication17-Aug-2014

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bharat Paliwal
23/14, Chopasni Housing Board Colony, Pal Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.139035

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Paliwal B, Jain S, Bhalla N. Difficult extubation: A rare cause. Indian J Anaesth 2014;58:505-6

How to cite this URL:
Paliwal B, Jain S, Bhalla N. Difficult extubation: A rare cause. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Dec 6];58:505-6. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2014/58/4/505/139035

Sir,

Anaesthesiologist experiences several unusual situations in clinical practice. We share one such instance in which problem was encountered in extubating a patient post-operatively due to a manufacturing defect in endotracheal tube (ETT).

A 7-month-old baby was posted for emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction. Pre-anaesthetic evaluation was normal. After applying routine monitoring such as electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter and non-invasive blood pressure, patient was pre-medicated with intravenous (IV) injection glycopyrrolate, fentanyl and ondansetron. Patient was induced with IV ketamine and rapid sequence intubation attempted with no. 3.5 uncuffed ETT (polyvinyl chloride). Since, it was difficult to negotiate beyond glottis; patient was intubated with smaller ETT (no. 3.0) orally in the next attempt. ETT was fixed after confirming bilateral equal air entry, normal end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ), and 100% oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ).

Injection atracurium and isoflurane were used for maintenance. Patient was manually ventilated with Mapelson F circuit during the entire course of surgery keeping EtCO 2 near normal. Bag pressure required for ventilating also remained uniform intra-operatively. Patient was reversed with injection neostigmine and glycopyrrolate after the appearance of spontaneous respiratory efforts and motor activity of limbs. Oral suctioning was done, and as a part of our routine procedure, we checked the ability of the patient to maintain acceptable saturation on room air prior to extubation. To our surprise, SpO 2 dipped to 88-90% with laboured respiration. Mapleson circuit was immediately reconnected and 100% O 2 delivered with manual assistance. Chest auscultation revealed no added sounds. ETT suction with infant feeding tube no. 8, inserted to the depth of 20 cm, was done to rule out probable obstruction of ETT by secretions. Attempt of room air trial was unsuccessful. ETT kinking in the oral cavity was ruled out by examination. Arterial blood gas and serum electrolyte reports showed no abnormality. Chest X-ray, done to rule out pneumothorax, pleural effusion and pulmonary oedema was normal. Meanwhile, oxygenation and manual ventilatory assistance continued to maintain normal SpO 2 and EtCO 2 . While it was being discussed on further course of management, patient got extubated accidently. Immediately patient was oxygenated with face mask and breathing circuit with 100% oxygen. To our surprise, respiratory efforts appeared to be normal and regular. Room air trial was attempted and found to be successful. We examined the ETT for possible obstruction. What we found was unusual - a crescentic projection in ETT lumen was revealed on ETT dissection, which was a result of manufacturing defect [Figure 1].
Figure 1: A crescentic projection in endotracheal tube lumen seen on cut section

Click here to view


An ETT obstruction commonly occur from causes such as mucus plugs [1] or blood clots. [2] Infrequently manufacturing defects such as plastic meniscus in ETT lumen, [3] defective connector, [4] asymmetric cuff, [5] or kinking, [6] have also resulted in ETT Obstruction. Our case represents a manufacturing defect, which has not been reported so far.

In this case, we missed manufacturing defect on pre-operative examination because of three reasons. First, ETT selected had to be changed to smaller one in a hurry and thus escaped careful examination. Second, the small calibre of the tube limited ability of manual inspection. Finally, because of transparent nature of the manufacturing defect, it was not readily identifiable.

The principal cause for desaturation in the case was obstruction of endotracheal tube with a consequent increase in airway resistance. The total work of breathing in patient on spontaneous ventilation consists of the patient's own physiologic work of breathing and additional work in overcoming the resistance offered by the breathing circuit and ETT. This additional work of breathing is mainly determined by the inner diameter of the breathing circuit, and the ETT (the narrowest of all the tubings) creates the most significant resistance to air flow. ETT resistance to airflow depends, besides on tube length and curvature, primarily on its diameter. Poiseuille's equation for resistance during laminar flow (Rα (η.L)/r4) states that resistance is inversely proportional to radius to the 4 th power. Therefore, small changes in radius have a 16-fold effect on resistance. Thus, the manufacturing defect, though small, by narrowing ETT lumen has added to work of breathing.

The above case emphasises on careful exclusion of manufacturing defect in ETT and not just a casual look at the patency of ETT lumen even in emergency situations. Furthermore, though accidental extubation was a fortunate event in the current case, it may not be a welcome event during routine practice, and all measures must be excised to prevent it.


   Acknowledgments Top


The authors acknowledge Dr. Prafull Kachhawaha, Dr. Vinay Joshi and Dr. Anamika Purohit for their valuable advice in this case.

 
   References Top

1.Gupta A, Kishor, Thakur VK, Kumar A. Sudden endotracheal tube block in a patient of achalasia cardia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:381-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Park C, Kim H, Yum K. Acute obstruction of an endotracheal tube: A case report. Anesth Prog 2004;51:62-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Sofi K, El-Gammal K. Endotracheal tube defects: Hidden causes of airway obstruction. Saudi J Anaesth 2010;4:108-10.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
4.Chen HS, Jawan B, Tseng CC, Cheng KW, Wang CH. Difficult ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube: An unusual manufacturing defect. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1094-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Rho EH, Long TR, Wass CT. Inadequate tidal volume: Asymmetric endotracheal tube cuff inflation resulting in a massive persistent airway leak. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1853.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Chua WL, Ng AS. A defective endotracheal tube. Singapore Med J 2002;43:476-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1123    
    Printed11    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded355    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal