Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 3991  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    


CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 733-738

Comparison of clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia


Department of Anesthesiology, Srimati Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Shalini Pravin Sardesai
D4/204, Laketown, Katraj, Pune - 411 046, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.170034

Rights and Permissions

Background and Aims: Intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) provides reliable and rapid analgesia with good muscular relaxation of the extremity distal to the tourniquet, but tourniquet pain and absence of post-operative analgesia are major drawbacks. α2 agonists, clonidine and dexmedetomidine are known to potentiate peripheral nerve blocks. The aim of this study was to compare clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to IVRA with respect to block characteristics, tourniquet pain and post-operative analgesia. Methods: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study was conducted on 60 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grades I and II, in two groups of 30 each, to receive either clonidine 1 μg/kg or dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg added to 40 ml 0.5% preservative-free lignocaine. Independent samples t-test was used for analysing demographic data, haemodynamic data and block characteristics and Mann-Whitney U-test for skewed data. Results: Sensorimotor block onset was significantly faster and recovery delayed with dexmedetomidine as compared to clonidine. Intra-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) at 10 min, 15 min and 40 min and post-operative VAS at 30 min and 2 h were significantly higher with clonidine. Fentanyl consumption and sedation were comparable. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer with dexmedetomidine. Haemodynamic parameters were comparable. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine significantly facilitates onset, prolongs recovery of sensory as well as motor block and also prolongs duration of analgesia as compared to clonidine.   Both decrease tourniquet pain satisfactorily and have comparable intra-operative fentanyl requirement . Patient satisfaction is better with dexmedetomidine.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1847    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded626    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal