Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1208  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 118-120  

Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters: A feasible and effective, opioid-sparing, post-operative pain management technique: A case series


Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication13-Feb-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sumitra Bakshi
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.151376

Rights and Permissions
 

Epidural analgesia, though the gold standard of post-operative pain management for laparotomies, is associated with limitations and is contraindicated in many patients. Opioid-based pain management, which is an alternative to epidural, has been implicated in post-operative nausea, vomiting, and ileus. We report successful management of post operative pain with ultrasound guided rectus sheath (RS) catheters. RS block is a promising alternative in scenarios were epidural is contraindicated, has failed or in case of unexpected change in the surgical plan.

Keywords: Opioid-sparing pain management, rectus sheath block, ultrasound-guided regional catheters


How to cite this article:
Bakshi S, Mapari A, Paliwal R. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters: A feasible and effective, opioid-sparing, post-operative pain management technique: A case series. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:118-20

How to cite this URL:
Bakshi S, Mapari A, Paliwal R. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters: A feasible and effective, opioid-sparing, post-operative pain management technique: A case series. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 20];59:118-20. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2015/59/2/118/151376


   Introduction Top


Epidural analgesia provides extremely effective pain relief [1] and due to opioid sparing effect it has been advocated by the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) working group for colorectal and urology cases. [2] Unfortunately, not all patients are suitable for epidurals. Sepsis and coagulopathy are contraindications. Insertion of epidural requires expertise and has a failure rate of 20-30%. [3] Other regional techniques like rectus sheath (RS) catheters show promise and with the increasing use of ultrasound are effective options for pain relief when epidural anaesthesia cannot be used.


   Case Report Top


We report three case scenarios of successful management of post-operative pain using intermittent local anaesthetic boluses through RS catheters.

Case 1

A 57-year-old female patient, weighing 62 kg with no co-morbidities was posted for laparoscopic surgery for carcinoma colon and gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the stomach. As minimal invasive surgery was planned, epidural was not attempted, and patient was administered general anaesthesia. Intra-operatively due to surgical reasons, open laparotomy had to be done. Rest of the intraoperative course was uneventful with blood loss of around a litre. In view of the midline incision extending from a point 3 cm above pubic symphysis right up to xiphisternum, adequate post-operative pain relief was essential. After wound closure, under anaesthesia and with adequate asepsis, a 16 gauge Touhy's epidural needle was inserted in the RS space, lateral to the upper end of the incision, under ultrasound guidance. After confirmation of the RS space using saline, epidural catheter was threaded in the space around 5-7 cm of length. The same procedure was repeated on the opposite side. The catheters were fixed with steristrips and tegaderm to prevent accidental dislodgement [Figure 1]. A volume of 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered through each RS catheter after insertion and repeated 6-8 hourly. For the next 24 h, the patient received concomitant analgesia in the form of intermittent doses of diclofenac 50 mg, paracetamol 1 g, and tramadol 50 mg by the intravenous (IV) route. From the 2 nd day onward, only paracetamol was continued, and the opioid was administered as a rescue, along with the 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine 8 hourly through each RS catheter. The patient was encouraged to ambulate right from the first postoperative day, and the RS catheters were removed after 72 h. The worst pain score recorded by acute pain service team using the numeric rating scale in the first 72 h was 3/10.
Figure 1: On the right side fixation of catheter with steristrips and tegaderm is seen

Click here to view


Case 2

A 60-year-old hypertensive male, weighing 72 kg, on regular antihypertensive medication underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit for carcinoma urinary bladder. Pre-operative investigations were normal except for a serum creatinine value of 1.6 mg % (0.7-1.3 mg %). The initial anaesthetic plan was epidural plus general anaesthesia. However, epidural catheter insertion was abandoned after multiple unsuccessful attempts. In the post-operative period, IV fentanyl was administered using portable patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) machine, along with injectable paracetamol for pain relief. On post-operative day 5, IV PCA was stopped in view of suspected intestinal obstruction for which patient subsequently underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intra-operative findings were suggestive of paralytic ileus with a dilated proximal jejunal loop. After the second operation, opioids were avoided, and the patient complained of moderate to severe pain at the operative site. After obtaining consent, bilateral RS catheters were placed under ultrasound guidance in the post-anaesthesia care unit, under adequate monitoring. A dose of 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine was given through each RS catheter, and the same was repeated every 6 hourly along with injection paracetamol 1 g 6 hourly. RS catheter was removed after 48 h. Average pain score at rest and movement was 2/10 and 3/10, respectively.

Case 3

A 40-year-old female, weighing 53 kg and diagnosed to have carcinoma rectum was planned for subtotal colectomy. She had received oxaliplatin- and capecitabine-based chemotherapy 2 months earlier. There was a history of dust allergy for which the patient occasionally required asthalin puffs. Her pre-operative investigations revealed a low platelet count (50 × 10 9 /L) with a hypocellular bone marrow picture. The liver enzymes and bilirubin were elevated (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT] 298 U/L, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase [SGPT] 192 U/L, serum bilirubin 2.5 mg/dl), though the rest of the liver functions (Total protein - 7.3 g/dl, Serum albumin - 4 g/dl, international normalized ratio - 1.04) were normal. As a repeat liver function test showed a decreasing trend in the enzymes and bilirubin (SGOT - 122 U/L, SGPT - 113U/L, serum bilirubin 1.46 mg/dl), after discussion with the gastroenterologist and the haematologist; and in view of a large and sessile polyp with a greater risk of bleeding, it was decided to go ahead for surgery. General anaesthesia was administered without attempting epidural analgesia, in view of the low platelet count. At wound closure, under ultrasound guidance, RS catheters were inserted on either side of the midline incision. Post-operatively, the patient received boluses of 20 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine 6-8 hourly through each catheter. The patient needed injectable tramadol 8 hourly on the 1 st day and on need basis thereafter. The catheters were removed at the end 96 h, with adequate pain relief.


   Discussion Top


In the above case scenarios local anaesthetic boluses through the RS catheter provided good pain relief as part of a multimodal analgesia regime. It is not unusual in our day-to-day practice to come across such cases were epidural analgesia is not a feasible option for pain management. The possible reason could be a contraindication for the procedure as in patient 3 or a failure of technique as in case 2, or an unexpected change in the surgical plan (case 1). Traditionally, in the above-reported cases, our option of pain management has always remained opioid-based, with patients being offered morphine- or fentanyl-based PCA pumps.

With the current emphasis on fast-tracking after surgery and considering the fact that opioids contribute to nausea, vomiting, and ileus; it is necessary to have a viable alternative for pain management. RS catheters provide a feasible option for effective pain management in these scenarios. In this technique, thin multiorifice catheters, are placed beneath the rectus muscle above the posterior RS on either side. [4] The deposition of the local anaesthetic in the relative avascular plane posterior to the muscle contributes to the slow vascular uptake of local anaesthetic. [5] A 20 ml bolus of 0.25% bupivacaine bolus every 6 h, through each catheter is recommended for effective analgesia [4] and is within safe limits for a healthy 50 kg and above adult.

The RS block has come a long away since its first description by Schleich in 1899 for perioperative relaxation of anterior abdominal wall. There are several case reports [6],[7],[8] and retrospective studies [9],[10] looking at the efficacy of this technique. The results of these retrospective analyses conclude that RS block is a safe and effective technique of pain management. At present, there is a paucity of prospective randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of this technique with respect to its opioid sparing effect or the current gold standard, namely epidural analgesia.

Use of ultrasound has increased the success rates of regional techniques. Dolan et al. have shown that ultrasound guidance significantly improves accuracy of RS block versus loss of resistance techniques. [11] With the ERAS group focussing on epidural analgesia as part of multidimensional approach of post-operative care; it is essential to have an effective opioid sparing technique, especially for patients in whom epidural analgesia is not a viable option. With the current available evidence, RS block is a feasible technique in scenarios that we have reported; that is, in cases where epidural is contraindicated, or has failed or in case of unexpected change in surgical plan. It is probably the need of the hour to formulate and propose an alternate algorithm to epidural analgesia, for effective pain management.


   Conclusion Top


Ultrasound-guided RS block with catheterisation can be feasible and effective pain management technique for midline laparotomies and can be considered when epidural analgesia is not a suitable option.

 
   References Top

1.
Crosbie EJ, Massiah NS, Achiampong JY, Dolling S, Slade RJ. The surgical rectus sheath block for post-operative analgesia: A modern approach to an established technique. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;160:196-200.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012;31:783-800.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P. Failed epidural: Causes and management. Br J Anaesth 2012;109:144-54.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Webster K. Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block. Update Anaesth 2010;26:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wada M, Kitayama M, Hashimoto H, Kudo T, Kudo M, Takada N, et al. Brief reports: Plasma ropivacaine concentrations after ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2012;114:230-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Malchow R, Jaeger L, Lam H. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after laparotomy - Without postoperative opioid use. Pain Med 2011;12:1124-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shido A, Imamachi N, Doi K, Sakura S, Saito Y. Continuous local anesthetic infusion through ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:1046-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Alsaeed AH, Thallaj A, Khalil N, Almutaq N, Aljazaeri A. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block in children with umbilical hernia: Case series. Saudi J Anaesth 2013;7:432-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
9.
Dutton TJ, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Use of rectus sheath catheters for pain relief in patients undergoing major pelvic urological surgery. BJU Int 2014;113:246-53.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Godden AR, Marshall MJ, Grice AS, Daniels IR. Ultrasonography guided rectus sheath catheters versus epidural analgesia for open colorectal cancer surgery in a single centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:591-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Dolan J, Lucie P, Geary T, Smith M, Kenny G. The rectus sheath block for laparoscopic surgery in adults: A comparison between the loss of resistance and ultrasound guided techniques. Anaesthesia 2007;62:302.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 The Analgesic Efficiency of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Analgesia Compared with Low Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Elective Abdominal Surgery with a Midline Incision: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Hany Mahmoud Yassin,Ahmed Tohamy Abd Elmoneim,Hatem El Moutaz
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2017; In Press(In Press)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Essentials of Our Current Understanding
Ki Jinn Chin,John G. McDonnell,Brendan Carvalho,Aidan Sharkey,Amit Pawa,Jeffrey Gadsden
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2017; 42(2): 133
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Postoperative analgesia of ultrasound guided rectus sheath catheters versus continuous wound catheters for colorectal surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Abd El Raheem Mostafa Dowidar,Hoda Alsaid Ahmed Ezz,Ahmed Abd Elaziz Shama,Marwa Ahmed Eloraby
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2232    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded523    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal