Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 60  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 703-711  

Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks: A new frontier in regional anaesthesia


Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Web Publication7-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
Arunangshu Chakraborty
79, Trikone Park, North Balia, Garia, Kolkata 700 084, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.191665

Rights and Permissions
 

The practice of regional anaesthesia is rapidly changing with the introduction of ultrasound into the working domain of the anaesthesiologist. New techniques are being pioneered. Among the recent techniques, notable are the truncal blocks, for example, the transversus abdominis plane block, rectus sheath block, hernia block and quadratus lumborum block in the abdomen and the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block 1 and 2, serratus anterior plane block and intercostal nerve block. This narrative review covers the brief anatomical discourse along with technical description of the ultrasound-guided truncal blocks.

Keywords: Pecs block, transversus abdominis plane block, truncal blocks, ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia


How to cite this article:
Chakraborty A, Khemka R, Datta T. Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks: A new frontier in regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:703-11

How to cite this URL:
Chakraborty A, Khemka R, Datta T. Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks: A new frontier in regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 24];60:703-11. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2016/60/10/703/191665


   Introduction Top


With the introduction of portable ultrasound machine in the operating theatres, the practice of regional anaesthesia has seen a transition from landmark-based techniques to regional blocks administered under direct vision through the new eye of the anaesthetist, the ultrasound machine. Use of ultrasound in regional anaesthesia was initially limited to peripheral nerve blocks until Hebbard et al. [1] described the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Following years saw emergence of newer regional anaesthesia techniques that are performed on the trunk, hence called the truncal blocks.

The unique feature of the ultrasound-guided truncal blocks is that in all of these techniques, in contrast to peripheral nerve blocks, no nerve or plexus needs to be identified: Local anaesthesia (LA) is injected in a particular muscle plane, in which the injectate spreads and reaches the intended nerves. This simple mechanism has made delivery of nerve blocks easy and versatile.

In this article, we have described the truncal blocks, many of which are still in research phase and yet to find regular clinical application. The truncal blocks can be broadly divided into blocks of the abdominal wall and blocks of the chest wall [Table 1].
Table 1: Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks: summary

Click here to view



   Blocks of the Anterior Abdominal Wall Top


Transversus abdominis plane block

The anterior branches of the intercostal nerves T 7-12 that innervate the anterior abdominal wall along with anterior rami of the first lumbar spinal nerve (L 1 ) travel in the plane between the internal oblique muscle (IOM) and transversus abdominis muscle (TAM). [2] The technique aims to inject 15-20 mL LA in the plane between these muscles [Figure 1]. The landmark-based technique was first described by Dr. Rafi. [3] The technique comprised eliciting two pops or loss of resistance (LOR) by a blunt-tipped needle entering perpendicularly at the lumbar triangle of Petit. For midline surgeries, the block has to be repeated on both sides. TAP block is the easiest to learn and most widely practised truncal block.

There are three described approaches to TAP block:

  • Posterior approach: Injection in the lumbar triangle of Petit. Usually employed in the landmark-based technique [4],[5],[6],[7]
  • Lateral approach: LA is injected in the neurovascular plane between the IOM and TAM with the ultrasound transducer (UST) placed transversely in the anterior axillary line, above the iliac crest [6],[7]
  • Oblique subcostal approach: Injection in the subcostal area; LA is injected between the posterior rectus sheath (PRS) and TAM. [8]
Figure 1: Left: Diagram showing the anatomical basis of transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block. Right: ultrasound image of transversus abdominis plane (arrow)

Click here to view


Oblique subcostal TAP (OSTAP) is also called upper TAP block. The term dual TAP means administration of TAP block in both lower, (i.e., by lateral approach), and upper areas. [9],[10] Bilateral administration of dual TAP block is required to provide complete analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall. This method is also known as four-quadrant TAP block. [11]

Ultrasound technique

Ultrasound-guided TAP block is considered as a basic level skill block . The patient is placed supine, but a lateral position may be helpful in an obese patient. [12] A linear UST with frequency between 10 and 18 MHz with depth setting adjusted between 3 and 5 cm (depending on the amount of adipose tissue) is placed transversely across the abdomen above the iliac crest at the anterior axillary line. External oblique muscle (EOM), IOM and TAM (superficial to deep) can be easily identified below the adipose tissue, and IOM is usually the most prominent muscle among the three. The peritoneal cavity lies deep to the TAM and can be identified by the movement of the bowel loops. If it is difficult to identify all the three layers, then the UST should be placed at the midline and rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) is identified and the UST is moved laterally where RAM tapers and ends in the linea semilunaris and the obliques begin. The UST is then moved laterally to a point where the three muscles can be clearly demarcated and the needle is introduced. A 100 mm 20-gauge/22-gauge Tuohy needle is chosen and introduced from anterior to posterior direction. The aim is to inject 15-20 mL LA in the plane between the IOM and TAM. Accurate placement of the needle tip may be facilitated by injection of a small amount of fluid (1-2 mL saline or LA) to hydro-dissect the appropriate plane. Correct placement of the injectate is confirmed by seeing the spindle-shaped hypo-echoic fluid pocket in the space lined by the hyper-echoic fascia of the IOM and the TAM after the injection.

For the OSTAP muscle block, the UST is placed just below the costal margin close to the midline and RAM is identified. In the sub-costal area, TAM lies deep to the rectus muscle. The block needle is then introduced into the plane between PRS and TAM. Block needle is gradually advanced laterally through hydro-dissection till we can see EOM and IOM along the lateral border of the rectus. A volume of 20-25 mL of anaesthetic solution is given along the line between the xiphoid process and iliac crest. OSTAP is considered advanced level block.

Indications

Analgesia for laparoscopic surgery, hysterectomy, lower segment caesarean section, herniorrhaphy, etc., An upper TAP block presumably, is more effective in upper abdominal surgeries while pain relief for sub-umbilical surgeries is well addressed by lower TAP block. Four-quadrant TAP block has been used for post-operative analgesia in laparotomies using a larger incision [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Left: Comparison of sensory block achieved by bilateral rectus sheath block (grey area over midline), bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (green semi-circle over lower abdomen) and unilateral oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (which can vary but approximately covers the area shaded in orange); Right: Above: Ultrasound image of oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: the needle is seen depositing the drug (black area) between the posterior rectus sheath and the transversus abdominis muscle. Below: Rectus sheath block: the needle is seen depositing the drug between the rectus abdominis muscle and the posterior rectus sheath

Click here to view


Complications

Complications such as intraperitoneal injection, liver trauma and catheter breakage have been reported with TAP block; however, with the use of ultrasound, the incidence of complications has reduced considerably.

Rectus sheath block

The rectus sheath block (RSB) was first described in 1899 and was initially used for the purpose of abdominal wall muscle relaxation during laparotomy before the introduction of neuromuscular block. Now, it is used for analgesia after umbilical or incisional hernia repairs and other midline surgical incisions. The aim is to block the terminal branches of the T 9-11 intercostal nerves which run between IOM and TAM to penetrate the posterior wall of RAM and end in an anterior cutaneous branch supplying the skin of the umbilical area. [13] A catheter can be placed for continuous infusion of LA. [14]

Ultrasound technique

A high-frequency linear array UST is held transversely over the RAM, which can be easily identified by its spindle-like shape on transverse section. A 22-gauge Tuohy needle is inserted into the plane between RAM and the PRS and 10-15 mL of LA is injected. A catheter may be placed for a continuous block. For inserting the catheter, the UST is rotated by 90° and a plane is created between RAM and PRS by hydro-dissection. The catheter is advanced 5-6 cm into the space. Bilateral catheter is required for a midline surgery.

Indications

post-operative analgesia for umbilical hernia repair and other umbilical surgeries.

Transducer position is transverse on the abdomen immediately lateral to the umbilicus.

Complications

Wound infection and catheter migration to intraperitoneal space are known complications of RSB.

Quadratus lumborum block

Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a posterior extension of the TAP block. It was first described by Dr. Blanco, [15] and it was later modified by Sauter et al. [16] The transmuscular approach involves injection of LA in the plane between quadratus lumborum (QL) and the psoas major muscles (PMMs) [Figure 3]. A catheter can also be inserted for continuous infusion.
Figure 3: Quadratus lumborum block: Left: Anatomical basis of anterior and transmuscular approaches. Right above: The transmuscular approach. Right below: The anterior approach

Click here to view


Ultrasound technique

The patient is kept in a lateral or prone position. A curvilinear UST is held transversely above the iliac crest. The transducer is then moved dorsally keeping the transverse orientation until the QL muscle is identified with its attachment to the lateral edge of the transverse process of the L 4 vertebrum. With the PMM anteriorly, the erector spinae muscle posteriorly and the QL muscle adherent to the apex of the transverse process, a well recognisable pattern of a shamrock with three leaves can be seen. [16] Imaging studies have shown that in QLB, the LA reaches the paravertebral space. [17],[18] Thus, QLB has been claimed to cause better analgesia than TAP block as it not only provides analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall but also blocks visceral pain.

Recently, an anterior approach [19] has also been described in paediatric patients, where a linear UST is held transversely in the posterior axillary line, and LA is injected in the plane between the anterior surface of the QL and the thoracolumbar fascia. QLB targets the lumbar plexus as well. Some clinical reports suggest its use in hip surgeries.

Indications

QLB is used for unilateral abdominal surgeries such as nephrectomy.

Complications

No complications have been reported so far with this block; however, catheter migration to retroperitoneal space is a concern.

Ilio-inguinal nerve and ilio-hypogastric nerve block or the hernia block

The ilio-inguinal nerve (IIN) and ilio-hypogastric nerve (IHN) arise from the first lumbar nerve and emerge from the upper part of the lateral border of the PMM. IIN is smaller of the two and travels caudally to IHN. As the lateral cutaneous branch of IHN may pierce the internal and EOMs immediately above the iliac crest, the nerves should be blocked as proximal as possible, i.e., just above the iliac crest, so these cutaneous branches are not spared.

Field block for inguinal hernia surgery has been administered since the 1980s. [20],[21],[22],[23]

Studies indicate that the ultrasound-guided TAP block approach is superior to landmark-based approaches of IIN and IHN block. [24],[25],[26],[27] This block has been used extensively in paediatric anaesthesia practice. [28]

Ultrasound technique

The patient is placed supine and the UST (linear) is placed obliquely just above the iliac crest along the line joining the anterior superior iliac spine and the umbilicus. [23],[24] A 5-8 cm 22-gauge needle is inserted in the plane. LA is deposited in the same plane as that of TAP block, i.e. between the IOM and TAM. LA is injected per side about 10-15 mL. Correct placement of the needle is identified by the expansion of the space lined by the hyper-echoic fascia of IOM and TAM after the injection.

Indications

Anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for inguinal hernia repair and surgeries following suprapubic incision.

Complications

Intraperitoneal injection and femoral nerve block are known complications.

Spermatic cord block or genitofemoral nerve block

The spermatic cord contains the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve and the testicular sympathetic plexus while the IIN lies just lateral to the cord. It also contains three arteries, viz. testicular artery, cremasteric artery and deferential artery and three veins, viz. pampiniform plexus and testicular vein, cremasteric vein and deferential vein. Landmark-based approach of spermatic cord block has been used by the surgeons for surgeries of scrotum and the testes, but the blind block often damages the blood vessels and cause haematoma.

Ultrasound technique

With ultrasound, it is easy to find out the spermatic cord and its contents. A high-frequency linear UST is used to image and identify the spermatic cord as an oval structure lying medial and superficial to the femoral artery. [29] Block can be attempted below or at the level of inguinal ligament, just medial and above the pubic tubercle. Care must be taken to avoid the blood vessels in close vicinity. [30],[31]

Indications

The indications are scrotal surgeries, chronic pain in the genitofemoral nerve area. [29]

Complications

Vascular trauma is apprehended; however, with the use of ultrasound, the block is safer.


   Blocks of the Chest Wall Top


Pecs block

The lateral pectoral nerve (LPN) and the medial pectoral nerve (MPN) are the main branches of the brachial plexus that innervates pectoral muscles. LPN arises from the lateral cord of the brachial plexus and the roots of T 5-7 cervical nerves. MPN originates from the medial cord of the brachial plexus from roots C 8 and T 1 . [32] LPN pierces the coracoclavicular fascia and is distributed to the deep surface of the pectoralis major muscle (PMm) and innervates its clavicular head. LPN provides sensory innervation to acromioclavicular joint, sub-acromial bursa, periosteum of the clavicle and anterior articular capsule of the shoulder joint and costoclavicular ligaments. [33] MPN enters the deep surface of the pectoralis minor muscle (Pmm), where it supplies the muscle. Two or three of its branches pierce the muscle and end in the PMm and innervate its costal head. MPN gives sensory innervation to inferolateral part of the PMm, ventral aspect of the arm and chest wall near the armpit along with the intercostobrachial nerve [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Left above: Anatomical basis of pectoral nerves block. Left below: Initial ultrasound scan showing chest wall muscles, ribs and pleura. Right: Ultrasound images of performing combined Pecs-1 and Pecs-2 blocks in single injection technique

Click here to view


Pecs-1

The Pecs-1 block is an interfascial plane block that aims to block the lateral and MPNs. LA about 10-15 mL is injected between the PMm and Pmm. The block is safely and reliably done under ultrasound guidance with the help of high-resolution linear UST.

Ultrasound technique

For the pectoral blocks, the patient has placed supine and a linear high-frequency UST is used. Depth is usually set at 3-5 cm. The UST is either held in a sagittal plane (same as in infraclavicular brachial plexus block) as described by Blanco [34] or placed below the lateral one-third of the clavicle transverse to the axis of the body. [35] The needle is directed from superomedial to inferolateral direction in both the approaches. Cranially, we can see the clavicle and below it we can see PMm (superficial) and Pmm (deep). Deep to the muscles, we can see the axillary artery and the vein. If a rib is visualised, it is usually the second rib and the pleura can be seen as bright hyper-echoic line beneath it. For Pecs-1 block, the 5-8 cm 22-gauge block needle is inserted and advanced in-plane to the UST from cranial to caudal direction and 10 mL of LA solution is injected between the two muscle layers.

Indications

Breast surgeries such as lumpectomy andinvolving breast expander/prosthesis. [34]

Pecs-2

In Pecs-2 block, 20 mL of LA is injected between the lateral edge of the Pmm and the serratus muscle at the level of the third rib. The aim is to block the lateral rami of intercostal nerves and the long thoracic nerve. This block is useful for most of the breast surgeries including axillary dissections. [35],[36]

Ultrasound technique

The UST is moved caudally from the Pecs-1 position till the third and the fourth ribs are visualised. The UST is then rotated 90° so that it lies transversely and moved laterally towards the anterior axillary line keeping the third rib at the centre so that the lateral border of Pmm is identified. Serratus anterior muscle is seen deeper to the Pmm lying on top of the third rib. The needle is advanced from medial to lateral side parallel to the ultrasound beam, and 20 mL of LA solution is injected in the plane between Pmm and serratus anterior.

Recently, a single injection technique of combined Pecs-1 and Pecs-2 blocks has been described.

Indications

Breast surgery with axillary node dissections.

Complications

No complications have been reported so far, but pneumothorax and trauma to vessels such as the thoracodorsal artery are concerns with these techniques.

Serratus anterior plane block

The serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a recently described regional block, designed to block the thoracic intercostal nerves along with the thoracodorsal and the long thoracic nerves. It aims to provide analgesia to the anterolateral and part of the posterior side of the chest wall as an alternative to epidural and paravertebral blocks. SAP block was described in healthy volunteers without clinical validation. The sensory paraesthesia was described in dermatomes from T 2-9 . In this block, the injectate is administered either superficial or deep to the serratus anterior muscle, and the difference is only the duration of the block. Duration of the block was found to be doubled if the LA solution was injected superficial to the SA muscle. Serratus plane block is a variation of Pecs-2; only the needle is placed in more caudally and posteriorly compared to Pecs-2 block. The needle is advanced "in plane" from caudal to cranial approach at the level of mid-axillary line. [37],[38]

Ultrasound technique

This block is usually performed in lateral or sitting decubitus. The UST is moved caudally (from Pecs-2 position) and laterally towards the mid-axillary line counting the ribs and serratus anterior muscle is identified as a thin sheet lying above the ribs. Keeping the 5 th rib in the middle of the ultrasound screen, the block needle is inserted in plane from anteromedial to posterolateral direction. LA solution about 20 mL is injected in mid-axillary line at the level of the 5 th rib either superficial or deep to the serratus anterior. To prevent inadvertent pneumothorax, it is important to aim the needle towards the rib. The Pecs-2 and the SAP block are considered "advanced level" skill block because of the vicinity of crucial structures and demanding technique.

Indications

SAP produces analgesia of the hemi-thorax. A few clinical reports are available about its efficacy for post-operative analgesia. [39]

Complications

No complications have been reported so far, but pneumothorax is a concern.

Intercostal nerves block

The intercostal nerves arise from the ventral rami of the thoracic spinal nerve. They are mixed nerves containing both sensory and motor fibres. The collateral branch of the intercostal nerve runs along the upper border of the rib below. It gives motor innervations to the intercostal muscles, latissmus dorsi, serratus anterior and abdominal wall muscles and sensory innervations to the pleura, peritoneum, anterior and lateral chest and abdominal walls.

Intercostal block produces stretch of band-like anaesthesia along the chosen plane. [40],[41]

Ultrasound technique

Patient decubitus is lateral, sitting or prone. A high-frequency linear array transducer is used. The ribs are identified by their curved hyper-echogenic surface outline and the acoustic shadow underneath them in a parasagittal view (between adjacent ribs, the intercostal muscles and pleura is identified (hyper-echoic line in gliding motion during respiration). Initial scanning is performed in the transverse plane of the rib to identify the level. The level of the block is marked by counting the ribs from above downwards starting from the 2 nd rib or in opposite direction starting from the 12 th rib. [40],[41] Another landmark used is T7 at the level of tip of scapula. [41] The ideal point to block the nerve is at the angle of the rib (6-7 cm lateral to the spinous process) before the nerves branches out. [42],[43] The neurovascular bundle lies between the internal intercostal and the innermost intercostal muscles.

In-plane or out-of-plane approach can be used. It is very important to identify the plane by hydro-dissection at every level to prevent damage to the pleura [44],[45] or the vascular bundle lying in proximity to the nerve. It is prudent to check for pnemothorax by seeing the gliding movement of the pleura and the comet tail appearance underneath (they both disappear in case of pneumothorax). [45] Once the correct plane is reached, 3-5 mL of LA solution should be injected after careful aspiration. The needle is introduced usually from the superior border of the rib below.

Indications

For providing surgical anaesthesia for thoracic and upper abdominal procedures and analgesia in case of chest trauma, flail chest and intercostal drain placement. This block is also given for chronic pain management in cases of postherpetic neuralgia. [42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49]

Complications

Pneumothorax is a known complication.

Interpleural block

LA is injected between the two layers of pleura. It is effective for thoracic and upper abdominal surgeries. Some centres regularly practice this block while others refrain from it citing the reported 2% incidence of pneumothorax among other complications such as pleural infection and adhesion. [50],[51] Landmark-based technique using a saline infusion has been practiced widely. [52] Use of ultrasound is expected to bring down the complication rate.

Ultrasound technique

Patient can be in sitting, lateral, semi-prone or prone position. A high-frequency linear UST is held transversely to image the pleura at 5-6 th intercostal space in the posterior axillary line. The two layers of pleura may be difficult to identify. The needle is inserted in plane to breach the internal intercostal membrane, directly beneath which lies the pleura, which can be seen as a shiny white line. The needle then is very slowly inserted further to breach the parietal pleura. A saline infusion technique can be used for additional safety to find out the inter-pleural space. A saline drip is attached to the block needle and made air free in the beginning. Inter-pleural space being a negative pressure space, the saline starts flowing freely once the needle enters the parietal pleura. Alternatively, an LOR syringe can also be used. [53],[54] A catheter can be placed in situ for continuous analgesia.

Indications

Inter-pleural block has been shown to provide safe, high-quality analgesia after cholecystectomy, thoracotomy, renal and breast surgery and invasive radiological procedures of the renal and hepatobiliary systems. It has been used successfully in the treatment of pain from multiple rib fractures, herpes zoster, complex regional pain syndromes, thoracic and abdominal cancer and pancreatitis. [53],[54],[55]

Complications

Pneumothorax, pleural infection and adhesion are known complications.


   Thoracic Paravertebral Block Top


The thoracic paravertebral space in transverse section is triangular in shape. The base is formed by the posterolateral aspect of the vertebral body, intervertebral discs, intervertebral foramina and articular processes; anterolateral border by the parietal pleura and the posterior border by the superior costotransverse ligament (CTL). This space communicates with the intercostal space laterally, and caudally, it extends up to L1 at the origin of psoas muscle. [56] Medially, it communicates with the epidural space through the intervertebral foramen. It contains fatty tissue, thoracic spinal nerves, intercostal vessels and the sympathetic chain.

Ultrasound technique

Patient can be in sitting, lateral or prone position. A high-frequency linear UST is held in the mid-scapular line in the sagittal plane and the desired level is found by counting the ribs or by counting the vertebrae. The rib surfaces (upper and lower) are seen as elevated dome-like structures, and in between them, three layers of intercostal muscles can be seen above the pleura, which is a shiny hyper-echoic line moving with respiration. The UST is then moved medially from there to reach the paravertebral space, which is at the level of the transverse processes where the upper surface is flat and intercostal muscles disappear. CTL may be seen as a hyper-echoic line between the two transverse processes. At the base of the space lies pleura. [57]

Both in-plane and out-of-plane approaches can be taken, the latter being preferred usually. [58] The target is to inject LA between the CTL and the pleura. Upon injection of LA, pleura is seen moving down, which is a hallmark of correct needle placement.

Indications

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can be used for perioperative pain relief after thoracic wall, chest wall and breast surgeries and renal surgeries. It can also provide pain relief after multiple rib fractures.

Complications

Pleural puncture, pneumothorax and epidural spread of the LA are the known complications of TPVB .


   Conclusion Top


Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia techniques are safer and more effective than comparable landmark-based approaches. [59] Although the journey started from imaging the known landmark-based approaches, the direction of current research is towards an era when ultrasound will become a necessity for the practice of regional anaesthesia as many techniques will be plausible only with the help of ultrasound. The truncal blocks are early representatives of that category of blocks. A working knowledge of regional anatomy is essential as well as ergonomics such as selecting the right position, side and equipment. [60] With the principles maintained, working with ultrasound can be an enjoyable educational journey for anaesthesiologists.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:616-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: A new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat 2008;21:325-33.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: A new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001;56:1024-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
McDonnell JG, O′Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2007;104:193-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Carney J, Finnerty O, Rauf J, Bergin D, Laffey JG, Mc Donnell JG. Studies on the spread of local anaesthetic solution in transversus abdominis plane blocks. Anaesthesia 2011;66:1023-30.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Abdallah FW, Chan VW, Brull R. TAM plane block: The effects of surgery, dosing, technique, and timing on analgesic outcomes. A systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:193-209.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: A meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013;111:721-35.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: Description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:436-41.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Børglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B, Jensen K. Ultrasound-guided bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block: A new four-point approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011;55:658-63.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Børglum J, Jensen K, Christensen AF, Hoegberg LC, Johansen SS, Lönnqvist PA, et al. Distribution patterns, dermatomal anesthesia, and ropivacaine serum concentrations after bilateral dual transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:294-301.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Niraj G, Kelkar A, Hart E, Horst C, Malik D, Yeow C, et al. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of four-quadrant TAM plane (TAP) block and continuous posterior TAP analgesia with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: An open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Anaesthesia 2014;69:348-53.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Toshniwal G, Soskin V. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in obese patients. Indian J Anaesth 2012;56:104-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.
Sandeman DJ, Dilley AV. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block and catheter placement. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:621-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Cornish P, Deacon A. Rectus sheath catheters for continuous analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:84.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Blanco R. Optimal Point of Injection: The Quadratus Lumborum Type I and II Blocks. Anaesthesia 2013;68. Available from:  http://www.respond2articles.com/ANA/forums/post/1550.aspx.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Sauter AR, Ullensvang K, Niemi G, Lorentzen HT, Bendtsen TF, Børglum J, et al. The Shamrock lumbar plexus block: A dose-finding study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:764-70.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kadam VR. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as a postoperative analgesic technique for laparotomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:550-2.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
18.
Visoiu M, Yakovleva N. Continuous postoperative analgesia via quadratus lumborum block - An alternative to transversus abdominis plane block. Paediatr Anaesth 2013;23:959-61.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Chakraborty A, Goswami J, Patro V. Ultrasound-guided continuous quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in a pediatric patient. A A Case Rep 2015;4:34-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ecoffey C. Regional anaesthesia in children. In: Raj PP, editor. Textbook of Regional Anaesthesia. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p. 379-93.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kopacz DL, Thompson GE. Celiac and hypogastric plexus, intercostal, interpleural and peripheral neural blockade of the thorax and abdomen. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO, editors. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anaesthesia and Management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1998. p. 451-85.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Reynolds L, Kedlaya D. Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric and genitofemoral nerve blocks. In: Waldman SD, editor. Interventional Pain Management. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 508-11.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Waldman SD, editor. Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block. In: Atlas of Interventional Pain Management. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004. p. 294-301.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bösenberg A, Johnston S, Wanzel O, Cox SG, et al. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:226-30.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Eichenberger U, Greher M, Kirchmair L, Curatolo M, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided blocks of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve: Accuracy of a selective new technique confirmed by anatomical dissection. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:238-43.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Aveline C, Le Hetet H, Le Roux A. Comparison between ultrasound-guided TAM plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:380-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gofeld M, Christakis M. Sonographically guided ilioinguinal nerve block. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1571-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Lee S, Tan JS. Ultrasonography-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal herniotomies in ex-premature neonates. Singapore Med J 2013;54:e218-20.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Shanthanna H. Successful treatment of genitofemoral neuralgia using ultrasound guided injection: A case report and short review of literature. Case Rep Anesthesiol 2014;2014:371703.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Wipfli M, Birkhäuser F, Luyet C, Greif R, Thalmann G, Eichenberger U. Ultrasound-guided spermatic cord block for scrotal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:255-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Birkhäuser FD, Wipfli M, Eichenberger U, Luyet C, Greif R, Thalmann GN. Vasectomy reversal with ultrasonography-guided spermatic cord block. BJU Int 2012;110:1796-800.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stecco C, Loukas M, Tubbs RS, De Caro R. Surgical anatomy of the pectoral nerves and the pectoral musculature. Clin Anat 2012;25:559-75.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Macéa JR, Fregnani JH. Anatomy of the thoracic wall, axilla and breast. Int J Morphol 2006;24:691-704.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Blanco R. The ′pecs block′: A novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia 2011;66:847-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Pérez MF, Miguel JG, de la Torre PA. A new approach to pectoralis block. Anaesthesia 2013;68:430.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): A novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2012;59:470-5.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: A novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia 2013;68:1107-13.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Tighe SQ, Karmakar MK. Serratus plane block: Do we need to learn another technique for thoracic wall blockade? Anaesthesia 2013;68:1103-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Madabushi R, Tewari S, Gautam SK, Agarwal A, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block: A new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain. Pain Physician 2015;18:E421-4.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Moore DC. Anatomy of the intercostal nerve: Its importance during thoracic surgery. Am J Surg 1982;144:371-3.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Bhatia A, Gofeld M, Ganapathy S, Hanlon J, Johnson M. Comparison of anatomic landmarks and ultrasound guidance for intercostal nerve injections in cadavers. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013;38:503-7.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Peng PW, Narouze S. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in pain medicine: A review of anatomy, sonoanatomy, and procedures: Part I: Nonaxial structures. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:458-74.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Moore DC, Bridenbaugh LD. Intercostal nerve block in 4333 patients: Indications, technique, and complications. Anesth Analg 1962;41:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Shanti CM, Carlin AM, Tyburski JG. Incidence of pneumothorax from intercostal nerve block for analgesia in rib fractures. J Trauma 2001;51:536-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Reissig A, Kroegel C. Accuracy of transthoracic sonography in excluding post-interventional pneumothorax and hydropneumothorax. Comparison to chest radiography. Eur J Radiol 2005;53:463-70.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Curatolo M, Eichenberger U. Ultrasound-guided blocks for the treatment of chronic pain. Tech Reg Anaesth Pain Manag 2007;11:95-102.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Byas-Smith MG, Gulati A. Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1033-5.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Shankar H, Eastwood D. Retrospective comparison of ultrasound and fluoroscopic image guidance for intercostal steroid injections. Pain Pract 2010;10:312-7.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Ozkan D, Akkaya T, Karakoyunlu N, Arik E, Ergil J, Koc Z, et al. Effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block on postoperative pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Prospective randomized controlled study. Anaesthesist 2013;62:988-94.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Morris CJ, Bunsell R. Intrapleural blocks for chest wall surgery. Anaesthesia 2014;69:85-6.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Strømskag KE, Minor B, Steen PA. Side effects and complications related to interpleural analgesia: An update. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990;34:473-7.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Scott PV. Interpleural regional analgesia: Detection of the interpleural space by saline infusion. Br J Anaesth 1991;66:131-3.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Dravid RM, Paul RE. Interpleural block - Part 1. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1039-49.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Dravid RM, Paul RE. Interpleural block - Part 2. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1143-53.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Sadana N, Mayall M. Interpleural blocks and clotting abnormalities: A case report. Anaesthesia 2008;63:553.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Lönnqvist PA, Hildingsson U. The caudal boundary of the thoracic paravertebral space. A study in human cadavers. Anaesthesia 1992;47:1051-2.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Batra RK, Krishnan K, Agarwal A. Paravertebral block. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2011;27:5-11.  Back to cited text no. 57
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
58.
Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, et al. Different approaches to ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: An illustrated review. Anesthesiology 2015;123:459-74.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
McDermott G, Korba E, Mata U, Jaigirdar M, Narayanan N, Boylan J, et al. Should we stop doing blind transversus abdominis plane blocks? Br J Anaesth 2012;108:499-502.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Wilson JM, Germain G, Vaghadia H, Tang R, Sawka A. In-plane ultrasound-guided needle insertion ALONG or ACROSS the visual axis hand positions. Br J Anaesth 2014;113:717-8.  Back to cited text no. 60
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Blocks of the An...
    Blocks of the Ch...
    Thoracic Paraver...
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1718    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded849    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal