Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 2297  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-33  

Evaluation of caudal dexamethasone with ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia in paediatric herniotomies: A randomised controlled study


1 Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Medicine Consultant in Private Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
3 Medical Officer, PHC Tyonda, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication26-Jan-2016

Correspondence Address:
Santosh Choudhary
C/O M S Ola, Vikas Nagar, Pilani Road, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.174804

Rights and Permissions
 

Background and Aims: Caudal analgesia is one of the most popular regional blocks in paediatric patients undergoing infra-umbilical surgeries but with the drawback of short duration of action after single shot local anaesthetic injection. We evaluated whether caudal dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg as an adjuvant to the ropivacaine improved analgesic efficacy after paediatric herniotomies. Methods: Totally 128 patients of 1–5 years age group, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II undergoing elective inguinal herniotomy were randomly allocated to two groups in double-blind manner. Group A received 1 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine caudally and Group B received 1 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine, in which 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone was added for caudal analgesia. Post operative pain by faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability tool score, rescue analgesic requirement and adverse effects were noted for 24 h. Results: Results were statistically analysed using Student's t-test. Pain scores measured at 1, 2, 4, and 6 h post-operative, were lower in Group B as compared to Group A. Mean duration of analgesia in Group A was 248.4 ± 54.1 min and in Group B was 478.046 ± 104.57 min with P = 0.001. Rescue analgesic requirement was more in Group A as compared to Group B. Adverse effects after surgery were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Caudal dexamethasone added to ropivacaine is a good alternative to prolong post-operative analgesia with less pain score compared to caudal ropivacaine alone.

Keywords: Caudal block, dexamethasone, paediatric herniotomy, ropivacaine


How to cite this article:
Choudhary S, Dogra N, Dogra J, Jain P, Ola SK, Ratre B. Evaluation of caudal dexamethasone with ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia in paediatric herniotomies: A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:30-3

How to cite this URL:
Choudhary S, Dogra N, Dogra J, Jain P, Ola SK, Ratre B. Evaluation of caudal dexamethasone with ropivacaine for post-operative analgesia in paediatric herniotomies: A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Oct 15];60:30-3. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2016/60/1/30/174804


   Introduction Top


Caudal block is the most popular and commonly used regional anaesthetic technique in children with a high success rate, for surgeries below the level of the umbilicus.[1] It reduces the requirement of inhaled and intravenous (IV) anaesthetic agents, attenuates the stress response to surgery, facilitates a rapid and smooth recovery and provides satisfactory post-operative analgesia [2] but with the limitation of relatively short duration of analgesia with single shot technique.[3] Use of caudal catheter for continuous infusion is usually not preferred due to high risk of catheter contamination from faecal soiling. To overcome this limitation, several adjuvants are added to local anaesthetic agent in a single shot technique.

Opioids, alpha 2 agonists and ketamine have been studied with local anaesthetics to increase the efficacy of caudal analgesia but are associated with adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and respiratory depression (in case of caudal opioids), hypotension, bradycardia (with caudal alpha 2 agonists) and more sedation with ketamine.[4],[5],[6],[7] Among local anaesthetics, ropivacaine provides a greater margin of safety, less motor blockade, less neurological and cardiac toxicity and similar duration of analgesia in comparison to bupivacaine.[8] Corticosteroids have a strong anti-inflammatory action [9] and have been used via epidural, intrathecal, caudal and perineural routes in adults for prolonging post-operative analgesia.

This prospective double-blind study was designed to investigate whether dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.2% ropivacaine enhances the analgesic potency in paediatric herniotomies performed under caudal block,.


   Methods Top


This randomised controlled double-blind interventional study was initiated with due permission from the Institutional Ethical Committee. A written informed parental consent, of 128 patients of 1–5 years age group, belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II undergoing elective inguinal herniotomy was taken. Patients having bleeding/coagulation disorder, local infection, sepsis, bacteraemia, vertebral deformity, pre-existing neurological diseases, allergy to ropivacaine or any other drug to be used were excluded from this study.

All parents were explained the about the anaesthetic technique and perioperative course during a pre-operative visit on the day before surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups (64 patients in each group), and randomisation was done by pulling chits out of a partially sealed box. Blinding was done by preparation of the medication according to assigned group by one investigator and block was performed by the second investigator who was blinded to group assignment. The observation and data collection were done by the second investigator. Group 'A' received a bolus of 1 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1 ml saline. Group 'B' received a bolus of 1 ml/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine with dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg in saline to make a total volume 1 ml.

On receiving the patient in the operation theatre, monitoring was attached in the form of electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximetric oxygen saturation (SpO2), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and parameters recorded. Pre-medication was done with injection glycopyrrolate 0.008 mg/kg and injection midazolam 0.05 mg/kg through already secured venous access. Anaesthesia was induced with injection ketamine 2 mg/kg and as a protocol of our hospital, thereafter caudal block was performed with 5 cm short bevelled 22-gauge needle in lateral decubitus position taking aseptic precautions. Once the needle was in epidural space, study drug was injected slowly, according to the group assigned in the chit after negative aspiration for blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Time of administration of block was noted. Anaesthesia was maintained with halothane and oxygen 40% and N2O 60% with patient breathing spontaneously via Jackson Rees breathing circuit as the procedure was of short duration.

All patients were monitored by a standard protocol in a uniform pattern during anaesthesia and surgery. Continuous monitoring of vital parameters- heart rate, ECG, respiratory rate, NIBP, SpO2 were done, and values were recorded before and after pre-medication, induction, caudal block, after incision and thereafter every 10 min until the surgery was over.

At the end of surgery, all anaesthetics were discontinued. Total time of surgery was recorded. Any side effects such as breath holding/apnoea, hypotension, involuntary movements, and nausea/vomiting were also noted.

After surgery patients were shifted to the post-anaesthesia care unit for further observation and monitoring. Patients post-operative pain status and degree of sedation were evaluated and recorded. Sedation by 5-point sedation score, post-operative pain by faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability tool (FLACC) score were determined on emergence from anaesthesia and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 h until the first dose of rescue analgesia was given in form of paracetamol suppository 15 mg/kg when the FLACC score was ≥4. Other adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, urinary retention, facial flushing and pruritus were also observed. The duration of analgesia was defined as the time period between administration of block until the time FLACC score reached ≥4. Results were collected and analysed.

The sample size was calculated based on anobservation made by Jo et al.,[10] they had taken three groups in their study as compared to two groups in this study. The sample size was calculated as 64 subjects for each of two groups at alpha error 0.05 and power 80% assuming a difference of means to be detected in time of first rescue analgesic requirement in ropivacaine plain group and ropivacaine with dexamethasone of 10 min with expected standard deviation 20 min. Results were collected and statistically analysed by using Student's t-test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


The two groups were comparable with respect to age, weight and duration of surgery. Intraoperative haemodynamic parameters were maintained within 20% of base value in both the groups having no significant variation. The mean duration of analgesia in Group B was significantly more than in Group A, i.e., 478.046 ± 104.57 min and 248.4 ± 54.1 P < 0.001 respectively. When pain score was compared within two groups, it was observed that at 4, 6, 12 h, it was significantly higher in Group A as compared to Group B and in first 2 h there was no significant difference in pain scores. There were no significant adverse effects noted in the two groups.


   Discussion Top


Our study demonstrated a significant prolongation in the post-operative analgesia by adding dexamethasone to caudal ropivacaine. There was a decrease in pain score and demand for rescue analgesic requirement during 24 h post-operative period and time for first analgesic administration was significantly longer with dexamethasone.

The effect of IV dexamethasone in decreasing post-operative pain has been studied in children mainly in otolaryngological procedures with a wide range (0.4–1.0 mg/kg) of dexamethasone.[11],[12],[13] Variation in dosage of dexamethasone, type of surgery and anaesthetic techniques, use of opioids intraoperatively and different methods for assessing post-operative pain may be responsible for conflicting results obtained in these studies. In one study, IV dexamethasone in combination with caudal ropivacaine in paediatric orchiopexy was used and reduced severity of post-operative pain and prolonged analgesic duration were observed.[14]

Other studies where dexamethasone was used as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic via perineural [15] epidural [10],[16],[17] intrathecal [18] and caudal [11],[19],[20] and routes for various surgeries supported its role in potentiating and prolonging the analgesic effect.

We used dexamethasone with a preservative in the form of methyl paraben and propyl paraben. Epidural corticosteroids have been used safely since long in the treatment of low back and radicular pain.[20] The safety of methyl paraben and propyl paraben has been proven for intrathecal injection in human and animal models.[20]

The exact mechanism of epidural or perineural dexamethasone is not known, but it is believed to have local anaesthetic effect by direct membrane stabilising action on nerves.[21] Use of dexamethasone is more common because it is a clear liquid (non-particulate) steroid.[22] The effect of dexamethasone on the spinal cord is due to the presence of transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), present throughout the nervous system.[23] Dexamethasone by regulating NF-κB inhibits central sensitisation after surgery and potentiates analgesia of the caudal block.[24],[25] Systemic administration of dexamethasone attenuates the level of bradykinin and by inhibiting phospholipase A29 and the expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 in peripheral tissues and in the central nerves system resulting in decreased production of prostaglandins, contributing to analgesia. Until date, no significant adverse effects have been reported for epidural dexamethasone [26] and caudal dexamethasone.[11],[19],[20] We used 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to 0.2% caudal ropivacaine. Dose calculation of dexamethasone capable of producing analgesia was based on the previous studies. [10,16]


   Conclusion Top


The addition of 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone to caudal ropivacaine for paediatric herniotomies as a single shot injection resulted in a significantly longer duration of analgesia as compared to the use of ropivacaine alone, and the quality of analgesia was better after the first 2 post-operative hours, without any side effects.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: An update. Minerva Anestesiol 2006;72:453-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Tang GZ, Luo MP, Xu KL. The minimum local anesthetic concentration of ropivacaine for caudal analgesia in children. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1465-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Wolf AR. Tears at bedtime: A pitfall of extending paediatric day-case surgery without extending analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:319-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
de Beer DA, Thomas ML. Caudal additives in children – Solutions or problems? Br J Anaesth 2003;90:487-98.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Ansermino M, Basu R, Vandebeek C, Montgomery C. Nonopioid additives to local anaesthetics for caudal blockade in children: A systematic review. Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:561-73.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Engelman E, Marsala C. Bayesian enhanced meta-analysis of post-operative analgesic efficacy of additives for caudal analgesia in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:817-32.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Singh R, Kumar N, Singh P. Randomized controlled trial comparing morphine or clonidine with bupivacaine for caudal analgesia in children undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 2011;106:96-100.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Reiz S, Häggmark S, Johansson G, Nath S. Cardiotoxicity of ropivacaine – A new amide local anaesthetic agent. ActaAnaesthesiolScand 1989;33:93-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Yao XL, Cowan MJ, Gladwin MT, Lawrence MM, Angus CW, Shelhamer JH. Dexamethasone alters arachidonate release from human epithelial cells by induction of p11 protein synthesis and inhibition of phospholipase A2 activity. J Biol Chem 1999;274:17202-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jo YY, Yoo JH, Kim HJ, Kil HK. The effect of epidural administration of dexamethasone on postoperative pain: A randomized controlled study in radical subtotal gastrectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61:233-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yousef GT, Ibrahim TH, Khder A, Ibrahim M. Enhancement of ropivacaine caudal analgesia using dexamethasone or magnesium in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Anesth Essays Res 2014;8:13-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
  Medknow Journal  
12.
Mohamed SK, Ibraheem AS, Abdelraheem MG. Preoperative intravenous dexamethasone combined with glossopharyngeal nerve block: Role in paediatric postoperative analgesia following tonsillectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:1815-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vosdoganis F, Baines DB. The effect of single dose intravenous dexamethasone in tonsillectomy in children. Anaesth Intensive Care 1999;27:489-92.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hong JY, Han SW, Kim WO, Kim EJ, Kil HK. Effect of dexamethasone in combination with caudal analgesia on postoperative pain control in day-case paediatric orchiopexy. Br J Anaesth 2010;105:506-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Cummings KC 3rd, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, et al. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:446-53.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Thomas S, Beevi S. Epidural dexamethasone reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:899-905.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Khafagy HF, Refaat AI, El-Sabae HH, Youssif MA. Efficacy of epidural dexamethasone versus fentanyl on postoperative analgesia. J Anesth 2010;24:531-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bani-Hashem N, Hassan-Nasab B, Pour EA, Maleh PA, Nabavi A, Jabbari A. Addition of intrathecal dexamethasone to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in orthopedic surgery. Saudi J Anaesth 2011;5:382-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
19.
Mohammed AA, Ibrahim WA, Safan TF. Dexamethasone as adjuvant to caudal ropivacaine as analgesic for labour. Ain Shams J Anesthesiol 2012;5-1:33-41.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kim EM, Lee JR, Koo BN, Im YJ, Oh HJ, Lee JH. Analgesic efficacy of caudal dexamethasone combined with ropivacaine in children undergoing orchiopexy. Br J Anaesth 2014;112:885-91.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Johansson A, Hao J, Sjölund B. Local corticosteroid application blocks transmission in normal nociceptive C-fibres. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990;34:335-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Benzon HT, Chew TL, McCarthy RJ, Benzon HA, Walega DR. Comparison of the particle sizes of different steroids and the effect of dilution: A review of the relative neurotoxicities of the steroids. Anesthesiology 2007;106:331-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Niederberger E, Geisslinger G. The IKK-NF-kappaB pathway: A source for novel molecular drug targets in pain therapy? FASEB J 2008;22:3432-42.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
De Bosscher K, VandenBerghe W, Haegeman G. The interplay between the glucocorticoid receptor and nuclear factor-kappaB or activator protein-1: Molecular mechanisms for gene repression. Endocr Rev 2003;24:488-522.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Xie W, Liu X, Xuan H, Luo S, Zhao X, Zhou Z, et al. Effect of beta met has one on neuropathic pain and cerebral expression of NF-kappaB and cytokines. NeurosciLett 2006;393:255-9.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ahadian FM, McGreevy K, Schulteis G. Lumbar transforaminal epidural dexamethasone: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2011;36:572-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    



This article has been cited by
1 Dexamethasone versus neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine 0.25% for caudal analgesia in children undergoing open inguinal hernia repair
Mohamed M. Abu Elyazed,Gehan M. Eid
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Adjunct analgesic drugs to local anaesthetics for neuroaxial blocks in children
Märit Lundblad,Per-Arne Lönnqvist
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2016; 29(5): 626
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2025    
    Printed27    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded603    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal