Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 3824  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 253-257  

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section


Department of Anaesthesiology, Smt. Kashibai Navale Medical College and General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication31-Mar-2016

Correspondence Address:
Maitreyi Gajanan Mankikar
Flat No. 101, DSK Rohan Model Colony, Shivajinagar, Pune - 411 016, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451

Rights and Permissions
 

Background and Aims: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a fascial plane block providing post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing surgery with infra-umbilical incisions. We evaluated analgesic efficacy of TAP block with ropivacaine for 24 h after caesarean section through a Pfannenstiel incision. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomised to undergo TAP block with ropivacaine (n = 30) versus control group (n = 30) with normal saline, in addition to standard analgesia with intravenous paracetamol and tramadol. At the end of the surgery, ultrasound-guided TAP plane block was given bilaterally using ropivacaine or normal saline (15 ml on either side). Each patient was assessed post-operatively by a blinded investigator at regular intervals up to 24 h for visual analogue score (VAS) and requirement of analgesia. SPSS version 18.0 software was used. Demographic data were analysed using Student's t-test and the other parameters using paired t-test. Results: TAP block with ropivacaine compared with normal saline reduced post-operative VAS at 24 h (P = 0.004918). Time for rescue analgesia in the study group was prolonged from 4.1 to 9.53 h (P = 0.01631). Mean requirement of tramadol in the first 24 h was reduced in the study group. Conclusion: US guided TAP block after caesarean section reduces the analgesic requirement in the first 24 h.

Keywords: Caesarean section, multimodal analgesia, ropivacaine, transversus abdominis plane block


How to cite this article:
Mankikar MG, Sardesai SP, Ghodki PS. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:253-7

How to cite this URL:
Mankikar MG, Sardesai SP, Ghodki PS. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 8];60:253-7. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2016/60/4/253/179451


   Introduction Top


Post-operative analgesia is important after surgery to avoid various complications such as venous thromboembolism, respiratory complications and prolonged hospital stay. Substantial pain and discomfort are anticipated after caesarean delivery; hence, analgesic regimen should ensure effective and safe analgesia. [1]

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) is the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle containing the thoracolumbar nerves T10 to L1. The introduction of local anaesthetic in this plane blocks these nerves (T10 to L1). We hypothesised that ultrasonography (USG)-guided TAP block reduces requirement of opioids and provides effective and adequate analgesia. [2]


   Methods Top


After obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent, sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients posted for elective and emergency caesarean section were included in a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial which was completed over a period of 6 months.

Patients were excluded from the study if they refused, had contraindications to spinal anaesthesia, required general anaesthesia for the surgery, had local anaesthetic sensitivity or were morbidly obese.

Patients were randomised by sealed envelope technique to undergo USG guided TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 30) 15 ml on either side - Group S or USG guided TAP block with 0.9% normal saline (n = 30) 15 ml on either side - Group C. The allocation sequence was generated by random number table. The patients, anaesthesiologists and staff were blinded to the allotment. All patients received spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg. All patients also received injection paracetamol 1 g intravenously (IV) at the end of the surgery.

USG-guided TAP block was given to all patients after skin closure. TAP block was administered by the posterior approach using the SonoSite NanoMaxx™ Ultrasonography machine with a linear array transducer probe (6-13 MHz). Patients were then transferred to the post-operative recovery room.

Pain severity was assessed by an investigator blinded to the allotment every 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h. It was measured using visual analogue score (VAS) (0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain). Rescue analgesia was given to patients on demand or when VAS was more than 4 in the form of IV tramadol 2 mg/kg.

The parameters studied and compared in both the groups were time to first request for analgesic, total tramadol requirement in 24 h and VAS at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, 24 h.

For sample size calculation, we considered that a clinically important reduction in 24 h tramadol consumption would be 25% absolute reduction. This was a conservative assumption based on our pilot data. We calculated that 28 patients per group would be required for an experimental design incorporating two equal-sized groups, using 0.05 and 0.2 alpha and beta errors. To minimise any effect of data loss, we elected to recruit 30 patients per group into the study.

Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software (SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.) Demographic data were analysed using Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The comparison of total tramadol requirement, time to first analgesic administration and VAS between the two groups was done by paired t-test. Confidence interval was 95%. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


Sixty patients were recruited in the study, of these thirty were randomised to undergo TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine and remaining 30 with placebo. Demographic profile, pulse, blood pressure and saturation were comparable in both groups [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic data were comparable in both groups

Click here to view


Time to first analgesic administration (tramadol) was prolonged significantly in Group S (mean - 9.53 h) as compared to Group C (mean - 4.1 h), P = 0.0163 [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Time for rescue analgesia in hours

Click here to view


In patients receiving TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine (Group S), the requirement for analgesic significantly reduced as compared to those who received the placebo block (Group C). Mean tramadol requirement for Group S was 140 mg and for the placebo group (Group C) was 246.66 mg, which was statistically significant (P = 0.000000439) [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Mean tramadol requirement in milligrams in the first 24 h after caesarean delivery

Click here to view


VAS was noted at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18 and 24 h. VAS was reduced after TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine for the first 8-10 h post-operatively as compared to patients receiving placebo block [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Comparison of visual analogue score between Group S and Group C

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The results of our study show that TAP block when used as part of multimodal analgesic regimen after caesarean delivery delayed time for rescue analgesia, reduced requirement of opioid analgesic and decreased VAS. Multimodal analgesia is an established technique for controlling post-operative pain. Multimodal analgesia provides better results by combining various drugs with different duration, and onset of action also reduces the side effects of individual drugs. [3]

Various other drugs can also be used for improving post-operative analgesia. Opioids have been effectively used to provide post-operative analgesia after caesarean section. Various studies have been conducted in which opioids have been used IV, [4] intrathecally and also epidurally. [5] However, opioids are associated with complications such as respiratory depression, pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. [4],[5] Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are commonly used but are associated with complications such as bleeding tendencies, uterine atony and gastrointestinal bleeding. [6],[7] Ketamine can also be used, but it affects interaction between the mother and the new-born. [8] Diclofenac, indomethacin and acetaminophen suppositories have also been used for post-operative pain relief. [9]

Epidural analgesia is a good alternative for post-operative pain relief, but the gravid uterus increases the chances of dural and vascular puncture, [10] also making it difficult to identify the space. Furthermore, it may not be preferred in case of emergency caesarean section. Infiltration of local anaesthetic is also used to provide pain relief, but it is not effective for prolonged analgesia. [11]

TAP block was introduced by Rafi in 2001. [12] He described it as block delivering local anaesthetics in the TAP using the anatomical landmarks (iliac crest) by first identifying the lumbar triangle of Petit. In 2007, Hebbard et al. introduced the USG-guided approach for TAP block. [13] The USG probe was placed transverse to the abdominal wall which made the three muscle layers distinctly visible after which the probe was moved to the mid-axillary line just above the iliac crest (i.e., over the triangle of Petit). The needle was then advanced medially by in-plane approach. This is referred to as the posterior approach. This approach is used in our study.

TAP block has been used for various abdominal procedures other than caesarean section such as large bowel resection, open/laparoscopic appendectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open prostatectomy, abdominoplasty with or without flank liposuction, inguinal hernia and iliac crest bone graft. [14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21] The TAP has poor vascularity, and hence the action is prolonged and not associated with any major complications. We used the USG-guided technique to avoid complication more common with the blind approach. [22] In addition, it gives a real-time picture and chances of failure are reduced.

A study using USG-guided TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine after caesarean section [23] was associated with reduction in total morphine use in 24 h in the active group (median 18 mg) compared with the placebo group (median 31.5 mg). VASs also reduced in the active group compared to placebo group (96 mm vs. 77 mm P = 0.008).

Similarly, a study was conducted in 2008 using TAP block after caesarean delivery by the blind approach, with 1.5 mg/kg ropivacaine (to a maximal dose of 150 mg) or saline on each side. [24] The study confirmed the usefulness of TAP block as seen by the reduced the VAS and requirement for morphine (66 ± 26 mg vs. 18 ± 14 mg, P < 0.001).

Two similar studies of TAP block were conducted in ASA I and II patients undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine or levobupivacaine. The studies revealed that pain scores were lower and time of demand for first analgesia was significantly longer in study groups compared to control (no drug) groups. [25],[26] Another study was conducted using 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine on either side, which included ASA II patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia; reduction in mean VAS score (P < 0.001) and reduced opioid requirement were observed. [27]

In our study, we used USG-guided technique for TAP block to avoid the complications of blind technique. We used tramadol instead of morphine to avoid its complications. [28] We used 0.5% ropivacaine 30 ml and also took care not to exceed the toxic dose that is, 3 mg/kg.

A study conducted in patients undergoing caesarean section using ropivacaine, 0.375%, 40 ml for TAP block for post-operative analgesia showed that the pain scores and opioid consumption were similar between the two groups. The groups consisted of one that received TAP block with ropivacaine (n = 50) and the other, placebo (n = 50). The mean (standard deviation) VAS on movement at 24 h in the ropivacaine and placebo groups was 3.4 (2.4) and 3.2 (2.2) cm, respectively, P = 0.47. [29] McKeen et al. in 2014 conducted a similar study using TAP block and observed no significant difference in opioid consumption (P = 0.2) and VAS (P = 0.61). [30]

Obese patients were excluded as the block was difficult to perform, and assessment was limited to only 24 h post-operatively (but pain severity reduced even in control group by this time). This may be considered as a limitation to our study.


   Conclusions Top


USG-guided bilateral TAP block with 0.5% ropivacaine (total 30 mL) reduces the postoperative opioid analgesic

consumption in caesarean section patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009;37:539-51.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ismail S. Multimodal analgesia for cesarean section: Evolving role of transversus abdominis plane block. J Obstet Anaesth Crit Care 2012;2:67-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
  Medknow Journal  
3.
Adeniji AO, Atanda OO. Randomized comparison of effectiveness of unimodal opioid analgesia with multimodal analgesia in post-cesarean section pain management. J Pain Res 2013;6:419-24.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ismail S, Afshan G, Monem A, Ahmed A. Postoperative analgesia following caesarean section: Intravenous patient controlled analgesia versus conventional continuous infusion. Open J Anesthesiol 2012;2:120-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Dualé C, Frey C, Bolandard F, Barrière A, Schoeffler P. Epidural versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2003;91:690-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Surakarn J, Tannirandorn Y. Intramuscular diclofenac for analgesia after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92:733-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: A qualitative review. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:199-214.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Reza FM, Zahra F, Esmaeel F, Hossein A. Preemptive analgesic effect of ketamine in patients undergoing elective cesarean section. Clin J Pain 2010;26:223-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Akhavanakbari G, Entezariasl M, Isazadehfar K, Kahnamoyiagdam F. The effects of indomethacin, diclofenac, and acetaminophen suppository on pain and opioids consumption after cesarean section. Perspect Clin Res 2013;4:136-41.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.
Laviola S, Kirvelä M, Spoto MR, Tschuor S, Alon E. Pneumocephalus with intense headache and unilateral pupillary dilatation after accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg 1999;88:582-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Yu N, Long X, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Succar J, Xin X, Wang X. Transversus abdominis-plane block versus local anesthetic wound infiltration in lower abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2014;14:121.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: A new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 2001;56:1024-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007;35:616-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bharti N, Kumar P, Bala I, Gupta V. The efficacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2011;112:1504-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, et al. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:601-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2008;107:2056-60.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: Description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:763-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
O′Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:91.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Araco A, Pooney J, Memmo L, Gravante G. The transversus abdominis plane block for body contouring abdominoplasty with flank liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:181e-2e.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Heil JW, Ilfeld BM, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, Mariano ER. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane catheters and ambulatory perineural infusions for outpatient inguinal hernia repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:556-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chiono J, Bernard N, Bringuier S, Biboulet P, Choquet O, Morau D, et al. The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for anterior iliac crest bone graft postoperative pain relief: A prospective descriptive study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2010;35:520-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Farooq M, Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt regional anesthesia needle while performing transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2008;33:274-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, Phillips F. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth 2009;103:726-30.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008;106:186-91.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Srivastava U, Verma S, Singh TK, Gupta A, Saxsena A, Jagar KD, et al. Efficacy of trans abdominis plane block for post cesarean delivery analgesia: A double-blind, randomized trial. Saudi J Anaesth 2015;9:298-302.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
26.
Cansiz KH, Yedekci AE, Sen H, Ozkan S, Dagli G. The effect of ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block for cesarean delivery on postoperative analgesic consumption. Gulhane Med J 2015;57:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chansoria S, Hingwe S, Sethi A, Singh R. Evaluation of transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean section. J Recent Adv Pain 2015;1:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Crowgey TR, Dominguez JE, Peterson-Layne C, Allen TK, Muir HA, Habib AS. A retrospective assessment of the incidence of respiratory depression after neuraxial morphine administration for postcesarean delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg 2013;117:1368-70.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Costello JF, Moore AR, Wieczorek PM, Macarthur AJ, Balki M, Carvalho JC. The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:586-9.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
McKeen DM, George RB, Boyd JC, Allen VM, Pink A. Transversus abdominis plane block does not improve early or late pain outcomes after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2014;61:631-40.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 High-dose versus low-dose local anesthetic for transversus abdominis plane block post-Caesarean delivery analgesia - a meta-analysis
S.C. Ng,A.S. Habib,S. Sodha,B. Carvalho,P. Sultan
British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Abdominal wall blocks in adults
Jens Børglum,Ismail Gögenür,Thomas F. Bendtsen
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2016; 29(5): 638
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) bocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis
R. Champaneria,L. Shah,M.J. Wilson,J.P. Daniels
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3848    
    Printed36    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded1152    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal