Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 125  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
EDITORIAL
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 619-621  

Learning research methodology: Revisiting the evidence


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication15-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
S Bala Bhaskar
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, Bellary, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.190613

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Harsoor S S, Bhaskar S B. Learning research methodology: Revisiting the evidence. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:619-21

How to cite this URL:
Harsoor S S, Bhaskar S B. Learning research methodology: Revisiting the evidence. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 6];60:619-21. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2016/60/9/619/190613

Sound knowledge of research methodology is important for conducting a proper study. It is also important for submitting the research proposal to regulatory bodies and for submitting the manuscript for publication subsequently. The three major considerations of research are related to scientific, ethical and regulatory aspects. [1]

The first clinical trial ('open uncontrolled trial') related to public health was probably conducted by King Nebuchadnezzar, who ruled Babylon in 6 th Century BC. He ordered that his subjects eat only meat-wine diet, believing that they would be in best health in perpetuity. However, this was opposed by some population of royal blood and vegetarians who preferred legumes and water. He allowed them to have their way for 10 days and then assessed their health; the vegetarians appeared better nourished as compared to the meat eaters. [2] In modern era, James Lind (1716-94) is considered as the first physician to have conducted a controlled clinical trial. As surgeon on a ship, he noted high rates of mortality in sailors with scurvy. He assigned the affected to receive different types of food items and found that those who received lemon and oranges had best improvement. May 20 th is designated the International Clinical Trials Day, because James Lind's celebrated controlled trial began on that day in 1747.

The first 'Double Blind Non-Randomised Controlled Trial' was conducted in 1943 involving one thousand British office and factory workers suffering from colds by The Medical Research Council UK, using patulin (an extract of Penicillium patulum) as treatment. [3]

The first randomised controlled trial was conducted in 1946 with pulmonary tuberculosis patients receiving either "streptomycin and bed-rest (S case) or bed-rest alone (C case)". Both randomisation and allocation concealment were enforced by Austin Bradford Hill, the statistician in the trial and this trial is considered as the 'pioneer' for the modern day randomised controlled trials. [4]

Considerations of protection of human rights during research have evolved over the past century as risks and burden to patient health were recognised. Ethical foundation related to medical research was first enunciated by the Nuremberg Code (1947) after the abuses by German doctors during 2 nd world war; the voluntariness of consent was the hallmark of this Code, followed by the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) by the World Medical Association (WMA) on ethical principles of research. This is updated periodically, the last time in 2013 during WMA General Assembly. [5]

The need for independent evaluation of medical products before marketing was felt in the background of many tragedies, especially the thalidomide incidence in Europe in the 1960s. Many countries developed their own laws and guidelines, but a common united approach among countries was felt with the industries seeking global markets, with large diversity in terms of regulations and requirements. Hence, the 'Harmonisation' of regulatory requirements was pioneered by the European Community in association with Japanese and American stakeholders from pharmaceutical industry (International Conference on Harmonisation) in the form of 'Good Clinical Practice' guidelines. [6] These have become the universal standards for ethical conduct of clinical trials.

The concept of critical appraisal and evidence-based medicine was introduced in the 1970s and 1980s to highlight the need to apply the scientific literature for bedside management and need for 'current' best evidence to be applied for patient care. [7],[8]

Reporting and publication are the sine qua non of research. The guidelines for conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work to improve the quality of medical science and its reporting was published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), a working group of medical journal editors and representatives of selected related organisations, including the World Association of Medical Editors. [9] The Indian Journal of Anaesthesia (IJA) (www.ijaweb.org/www.ijaweb.in) follows the ICMJE guidelines for reporting, editing and publications as do majority of the medical journals in the world.

Registration of the research proposal of the trials is recommended with separate entities/bodies which are expected to be easily accessible, not-for-profit groups which do not charge fees and are electronically searchable with mechanism for validation of the registration data.[9] Registration of the research is necessary to allow for genuine reporting so that selective, duplicative, repetitive and motivated works are avoided. The research proposals would also be accessible to public and patients so that they have knowledge of the on-going trials and whether they want to enrol. The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) will also be guided by the registry to check for novelty of proposed research and relevance of data related to the proposals submitted to them.

The World Health Organisation hosts the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and those registries which meet the requirements as per the ICMJE are included in this list; Clinical Trials Registry - India is one of them (http://ctri.nic.in).

At the institutional level, the IECs or Institutional Review Boards perform the duties of assessing the research proposal and the ethical aspects. The constitution of the IEC and its roles and responsibilities are well defined and no research is allowed to start before prior approval of these bodies. [10],[11]

In India, the premier agency that regulates the biomedical research is the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), with a history of over 100 years. The precursor of ICMR was the Indian Research Fund Association (1911) which was re-designated as ICMR in 1949. The ICMR supported many projects including research, over many decades; The Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants was first released in 2000 and later updated in 2006. A new updated draft is now available pending final approval. [10],[11] All aspects of biomedical research in India are governed by ICMR.

There has been rekindling of interest in research and publications in the last few years in India. This has been so because of the recent regulations of central authority on medical education, the Medical Council of India, which has received both acclaim and criticism. [12]

The authors feel that the regulations have indeed lighted up the research scenario in India, but opinion is that progress here is hindered by systemic lack of mandatory effective teaching and training in research methodology. A student-centric approach to teaching in research methodology has also been felt recently among the anaesthesia faculty and trainees as it is felt that many existing teaching modules include lecture-based approaches and are not speciality specific. Epidemiological studies are less frequent in anaesthesia and critical care practice and much of the research is related to short-term interventions in the perioperative period. Keeping these factors in mind, the Governing Council of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists (ISA) approved the preparation of a new workshop module on Research Methodology and Publications in 2015, with President, the Editor-in-Chief of the IJA and a three-member expert group as members. The module, since then, has been operationalised and successfully implemented in various workshops across India.

This issue of the IJA is another effort by the ISA and IJA to promote research methodology and publications among anaesthesiologists which covers all the aspects of the research methodology; some of the chapters have links to additional material which is available online due to constraints of print pages.

 
   References Top

1.
Bhatt A. Evolution of clinical research: A history before and beyond james lind. Perspect Clin Res 2010;1:6-10.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Collier R. Legumes, lemons and streptomycin: A short history of the clinical trial. CMAJ 2009;180:23-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
D′Arcy Hart P. A change in scientific approach: From alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s. BMJ 1999;319:572-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
MRC Streptomycin in Tuberculosis Trials Committee. Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. BMJ 1948;2:769-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 27].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
ICH Guidelines. Available from: http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines.html. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 26].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sur RL, Dahm P. History of evidence-based medicine. Indian J Urol 2011;27:487-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
8.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn′t. BMJ 1996;312:71-2.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 18].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants - Indian Council of Medical Research. New Delhi; 2006. Available from: http://www.icmr.nic.in/ethical_guidelines.pdf. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 06].  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Draft, National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants; 2016. Available from: http://www.icmr.nic.in/icmrnews/draft_ethical/draft_guidelines. [Last accessed on 2016 Aug 06].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Aggarwal R, Gogtay N, Kumar R, Sahni P; Indian Association of Medical Journal Editors. The revised guidelines of the Medical Council of India for academic promotions: Need for a rethink. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1906    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1104    
    Comments [Add]1    

Recommend this journal