Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 2035  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 444-446  

Knotted epidural catheter in an infant: A case report


Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication9-May-2017

Correspondence Address:
Chandrakala Kunigal Ravishankar
Shrinidhi, 805/I, 15th Cross, Kanakapura Road, Jayanagar 7th Block (West), Bengaluru - 560 070, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_458_16

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Ravishankar CK. Knotted epidural catheter in an infant: A case report. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:444-6

How to cite this URL:
Ravishankar CK. Knotted epidural catheter in an infant: A case report. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 6];61:444-6. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2017/61/5/444/205996

Sir,

Epidural analgesia has many beneficial effects in the paediatric population. In clinical practice, it is commonly used to augment general anaesthesia and to manage postoperative pain.[1] This is a relatively safe procedure; however, adverse events such as dural punctures, spinal haematomas or epidural abscesses have been reported.[2] Among the various issues the anaesthesiologist may face while dealing with epidural catheters, breakage or coiling and knotting of the catheter is a rare but troublesome event.

A 5-month-old healthy male infant weighing 5 kg presented with Hirschsprung's disease and was admitted for levelling biopsy and Duhamel procedure. Medical history was insignificant with normal physical examination and laboratory investigations. Epidural catheter insertion was planned for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 25 mg and fentanyl 10 mg, and tracheal intubation was facilitated with atracurium 2.5 mg. A 3.5-mm micro-cuff endotracheal tube was passed. Anaesthesia was maintained with N2O, O2 and isoflurane1% with intermittent positive pressure ventilation.

In the left lateral position, with all aseptic precautions, the epidural space was identified by loss of resistance technique at L2–L3 level using B. BRAUN Perican ® 20-gauge Tuohy needle, and a 24-gauge catheter was introduced 9 cm beyond the tip. As the Tuohy needle was being removed, the catheter was continuously threaded. After removal of the Tuohy needle, an attempt was made to withdraw the catheter such that 4 cm of catheter remained inside the epidural space. However, a significant resistance was encountered at 9 cm in spite of steady and persistent traction. Various methods were tried for the removal of catheter, but none showed results. A computerised tomography scan was done, and the level of catheter was identified. After consultation with neurosurgeon and discussion with the parents, consent was taken for laminotomy, and the catheter was retrieved by a neurosurgeon. As seen in [Figure 1], a loop had formed at 9 cm with the knot.
Figure 1: Knotted epidural catheter

Click here to view


Regional anaesthesia in neonates and infants has several advantages including reduction in the requirement of systemic opioids and inhalational anaesthetic agents, reduced post-surgical pain and facilitation of early extubation.[3]

Knotting of catheter is a very rare complication with the incidence of 0.0015%.[4] Most cases (88%) involved obstetric patients.[4] Knotting of catheter is related to leaving the catheter too much inside the space.[4] In most cases, it occurs during catheter removal; however, in this case, it occurred during insertion while withdrawing of the catheter to its correct length.

Bromage reported that the catheter tends to be deflected by blood vessels and nerve roots that lie in its path and as a result curl up or double back. This is more common in the lumbar region than in thoracic. This may be because of oblique direction of the needle required in thoracic epidural insertion.[5]

In this case, 9 cm of catheter was inserted before the Tuohy needle was removed. As the Tuohy needle was withdrawn, the catheter was continuously threaded and the speed of catheter insertion was faster than the speed of the Tuohy needle removal. Therefore, the actual length of the catheter in the epidural space was greater before pulling it back and was 10 cm. Leaving the catheter <4 cm in length in the epidural space may avoid this complication.[6]

Once the knot is noticed or difficulty with removal of catheter encountered, there are various options to consider such as gentle, firm and constant traction, or changing the position from flexion to extension to loosen the adhesions, or topical application of hot packs to soften the tissues, or saline injection while pulling the catheter and passing the guidewire into the catheter to increase the rigidity of the catheter.[3] Removal can be done by making a small incision at insertion site. Ultrasound may help in identification of subcutaneous epidural knot.

Some textbooks recommend leaving the sequestered catheter in place instead of attempting surgical removal because epidural catheters are manufactured of biologically inert materials. This is reasonable in adults, but not in children. In a growing child, the indwelling time of catheter is longer and it may lead to erosion of dura, infection, fibrosis and irritation of nerve tissues. Alternatively, removal of epidural fragment by laminectomy can be considered. It should be kept in mind that, in an infant, this may disrupt spinal development and lead to scoliosis.[7]

If the catheter is sheared during removal, it has been suggested that catheter fragment may be left in situ and the residual part will become eventually fibrosed with limited risk of harm to the patient. Continuous monitoring is suggested given the risk of infection related to a retained foreign body.[8]

Despite the numerous advantages of neuraxial analgesia, complications can occur during the placement. As noted in this case, blind advancement and over-threading may result in inadvertent knot formation. Excessive threading of the catheter in the epidural space may result in knotting, malposition and displacement. Hence, caution has to be exercised while threading the catheter.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank her family and friends for their constant support. A special mention to Dr. P M Chandrashekar for his insightful guidance and mentorship.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by the Departmental Resources.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Paediatric Epidural and Caudal Analgesia and Anaesthesia in Children. NYSORA; 2014. Available from: http://www.anes-som.ucsd.edu/Intranet/Peds_Resources/Regional/. [Last cited on 2015 Oct 24].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pinciroli R, Fumagalli R. The unexpected epidural: A case report. BMC Anesthesiol 2015;15:83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Joselyn A, Bhalla T, Schloss B, Martin D, Tobias J. A case report of a retained and knotted caudal catheter. Saudi J Anaesth 2014;8:424-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Huang J, Lawrence J, Sposato M. Another case of knotting of an epidural catheter. AANA J 2010;78:93-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Browne RA, Politi VL. Knotting of an epidural catheter: A case report. Can Anaesth Soc J 1979;26:142-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pant D, Jain P, Kanthed P, Sood J. Epidural catheter breakage: A dilemma. Indian J Anaesth 2007;51:434-7. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2007/51/5/434/61178. [Last cited on 2015 Oct 01].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lenox WC, Kost-Byerly S, Shipley R, Yaster M. Pediatric caudal epidural catheter sequestration: An unusual complication. Anesthesiology 1995;83:1112-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mitra R, Fleischmann K. Management of the sheared epidural catheter: Is surgical extraction really necessary? J Clin Anesth 2007;19:310-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1168    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded203    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal