Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1867  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 513-515  

Use of Merocel® aids in prevention of nasal pressure ulcers following nasal intubation: Case series of 33 patients


1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication12-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Sukhyanti Kerai
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital, Tahirpur, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_26_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh R, Sood N, Kerai S, Puri A. Use of Merocel® aids in prevention of nasal pressure ulcers following nasal intubation: Case series of 33 patients. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:513-5

How to cite this URL:
Singh R, Sood N, Kerai S, Puri A. Use of Merocel® aids in prevention of nasal pressure ulcers following nasal intubation: Case series of 33 patients. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 10];61:513-5. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2017/61/6/513/207760




   Introduction Top


Nasotracheal intubation is the preferred route of airway management for oral and maxillofacial surgeries.[1] Nasal pressure ulcers are a frequently overlooked complication of this technique, especially in cases where intubation is required for a prolonged period. The necrosis can lead to cosmetic and functional disability that may require prolonged medical care and even surgical correction. It may also raise medicolegal problems. Techniques described in the literature to reduce the risk of alar necrosis include the use of hydrocolloid dressing, polyvinyl alcohol foam, Dynaplast™ and modified endotracheal tube (ETT).[2],[3],[4],[5] We evaluated the efficacy of the use of polyvinyl alcohol foam dressings to prevent nasal alar necrosis in patients requiring prolonged nasotracheal intubation for surgeries for oral and maxillofacial carcinoma.


   Methods Top


After obtaining approval from the institutional review board, we selected adult patients of either sex requiring prolonged nasotracheal intubation for surgeries for oral and maxillofacial carcinoma lasting more than 8 h to receive Merocel ® nasal pack. The study was conducted between December 2015 and July 2016. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. The exclusion criteria were patient's refusal to participate in the study and anticipated duration of nasotracheal intubation <8 h. All the patients underwent detailed pre-anaesthetic evaluation as per the institutional protocol. The more patent nostril or the right nostril in case both the nostrils were equally patent, was selected for nasotracheal intubation. The nostril was prepared for intubation by 0.5% xylometazoline drops and lignocaine 2% jelly. After induction of general anaesthesia, nasotracheal intubation using flexometallic ETT no. 7.5 for males and 6.5 for females was done using direct laryngoscopy and Magills forcep guidance. We used polyvinyl alcohol foam dressings (Merocel ® Standard Nasal dressing, 8 cm Medtronics) for packing the nasal alae which formed a cushion between the ETT and nasal mucosa. The Merocel ® was trimmed to the shape of nasal cavity and lubricated with Neosporin ointment before nasal placement [Figure 1]. The packing was fixed to the tube using silk to prevent its dislodgement. After the completion of surgery, as per our institutional protocol, all patients received elective mechanical ventilation for 12 h via the nasotracheal tube. The patients were evaluated immediately after the surgery and after 24 h.
Figure 1: Use of Merocel® in fixation of flexometallic endotracheal tube

Click here to view


The development of the pressure ulcers was categorised based on the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel–National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.[6]

  • Grade 1: Persistent discolouration of the skin including non-blanchable erythema
  • Grade 2: Partial-thickness skin loss involving epidermis and dermis
  • Grade 3: Full-thickness skin loss involving subcutaneous tissues but not underlying fascia, bone, tendon or joint capsule
  • Grade 4: Full-thickness skin loss extending to the underlying bone, tendon or joint capsule.


The continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation, and as percentages for discrete variables.


   Results Top


A total of 33 patients were taken up for Merocel ® nasal packing for prevention of nasal alar necrosis following prolonged nasotracheal intubation. All patients underwent reconstructive surgeries with modified neck dissection for oral and maxillofacial carcinomas. The mean duration of nasal intubation was 26.07 ± 2.2 h. The mean duration of surgery was 9 ± 2.9 h. One patient developed pressure sores of category 1 (3%). No intervention was required in any of the patients. Prior data from our institution suggested that the incidence of nasal ulcers from prolonged nasotracheal intubation (24-30hours) without using Merocel for fixation of ETT was 51.4%.

The patient demography, baseline parameters and incidence of nasal pressure ulcer are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Patients demography, baseline parameters and incidence of pressure ulcer

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The development of nasal pressure ulcers is an ignored complication of prolonged nasotracheal intubation. The nose is especially at risk of development of ulcers as it is devoid of fatty cushion, an therefore there is a high likelihood of full-thickness damage. The development of nasal pressure ulcer depends on the material of the ETT, its duration of placement and whether fixation of tube is proper or not. There is increased risk in prolonged surgeries, and with frequent movement of the ETT, Skin moisture/oedema during the prolonged contact period may macerate the skin, making it less resilient. The incidence of this complication is rarely reported in literature. A case series reported a prevalence of 0.59% for pressure sores; all patients affected had operations that lasted for more than 10 h.[7] Another study reported incidence of nasal alar necrosis to be 24.48% in the head and neck reconstructive surgeries lasting more than 6 h.[8]

To reduce the risk, use of many specialised dressings such as hydrocolloid dressing, Dynaplast™ and polyvinyl alcohol foam dressings (Merocel ®) have been reported. Merocel has various desirable protective properties. It forms a cushion that leads to pressure redistribution and reduces frictional forces between the nasal mucosa and the ETT during frequent turning of the head. An additional feature that reduces maceration of skin is moisture absorption which is not seen with Dynaplast™ or hydrocolloid dressing. Merocel is being routinely used by otorhinolaryngologists after nasal surgeries for packing. It facilitates haemostatic and reparative process and creates a moist environment in the nasal cavity.[9] The minor disadvantages of using nasal packs include in situ pain, bleeding and pain on removal.[10] However, their incidence is rare. Merocel is commonly used and cost effective. A single pack of 8 cm Merocel is available in India for Rs. 300–400.

The mean duration of nasotracheal placement was 26.07 ± 2.2 h in our patients. Merocel has been safely used for up to 48–72 h for nasal packing. Its prolonged use may increase the risk of bacterial colonisation.[11] Despite using Merocel ®, one patient of 33 developed Grade 1 pressure ulcers which implies that adjunctive steps are needed to reduce the occurrence and severity of pressure ulcers. These may include using proper size of ETT, appropriate fixation and positioning of the tube, use of soft flexible nasotracheal tube, repeated assessment of the skin during surgery, and avoidance of repositioning of tube and frequent head movement.

In our patients, we used flexometallic ETT for nasal intubation as standard of care. All participants were intubated with appropriately sized ETTs according to size of nostrils and unnecessary manipulation of tube, and head position was avoided. The limitation of this study is that a small number of patients were undertaken without any control group for comparison. Future randomised controlled trials are warranted to examine the efficacy of Merocel in prevention of nasal pressure sores associated with prolonged nasotracheal intubation. Another limitation is that patients were followed only upto 24 hours after surgery; further studies should consider follow up of patients for longer period to assess any cosmetic deformity.


   Conclusion Top


The nasal pressure ulcer is a commonly unacknowledged complication of prolonged nasotracheal intubation. During surgeries, requiring prolonged nasotracheal intubation, the use of Merocel ® during fixation of ETT is a simple and effective adjuvant for prevention of pressure ulcers.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Hall CE, Shutt LE. Nasotracheal intubation for head and neck surgery. Anaesthesia 2003;58:249-56.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Iwai T, Goto T, Maegawa J, Tohnai I. Use of a hydrocolloid dressing to prevent nasal pressure sores after nasotracheal intubation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:e65-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Anand R, Turner M, Sharma S, Mourouzis C, Mellor TK, Brennan PA. Use of a polyvinyl acetyl sponge (Merocel) nasal pack to prevent alar necrosis during prolonged nasal intubation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:601.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mukherji S, Aggarwal H. A simple technique of preventing pressure sores of the nasal ala during nasotracheal intubation with armored tube. Int J Head Neck Surg 2013;4:136.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cherng CH, Chen YW. Using a modified nasotracheal tube to prevent nasal ala pressure sore during prolonged nasotracheal intubation. J Anesth 2010;24:959-61.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. In: Haesler E, editor. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Osborne Park, Australia: Cambridge Media; 2014. Available from: http://www.npuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Quick-Reference-Guide-DIGITAL-NPUAP-EPUAP-PPPIA-Jan2016.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 15].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Huang TT, Tseng CE, Lee TM, Yeh JY, Lai YY. Preventing pressure sores of the nasal ala after nasotracheal tube intubation: From animal model to clinical application. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:543-51.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rastogi S, Bhutia T, Singh A, Arun P. Nasal ala pressure sores following head and neck reconstructive surgery: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary cancer hospital. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:74-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Weber RK. Nasal packing and stenting. Laryngorhinootologie 2009;88 Suppl 1:S139-55.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang J, Cai C, Wang S. Merocel versus Nasopore for nasal packing: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2014;9:e93959.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ha JF, Hodge JC, Lewis R. Comparison of nasendoscopic-assisted cautery versus packing for the treatment of epistaxis. ANZ J Surg 2011;81:336-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1135    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded214    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal