|LETTERS TO EDITOR
|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 10 | Page : 865-866
Surgical site fire during surgery in operating room under general anaesthesia
Shalendra Singh1, Shreyas Kate1, Sonia Bhan1, Virender Suhag2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Command Hospital (SC), Pune, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||04-May-2019|
|Date of Decision||26-May-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||26-Jun-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||10-Oct-2019|
Dr. Shalendra Singh
Department of Anaesthesiologist and Critical Care, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune - 411 040, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Singh S, Kate S, Bhan S, Suhag V. Surgical site fire during surgery in operating room under general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:865-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Singh S, Kate S, Bhan S, Suhag V. Surgical site fire during surgery in operating room under general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 7];63:865-6. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2019/63/10/865/268714
Operating room (OR) fires, although considered rare, are preventable adverse events associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Despite taking all safety precautions and abiding by all the recommendations for fire prevention, such unintentional events do occur. The prerequisites for every fire are an ignition source, a fuel source, and an oxidiser. Notably, among the vast majority of cases reported worldwide, very few have been described in detail till date. Herein, we report a case of a lady undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia, who experienced an OR fire related to the use of alcohol-based solution ignited by monopolar electrocautery.
A 33-year-old female, a case of carcinoma right buccal mucosa planned for wide marginal mandibulectomy under general anaesthesia. The trachea was nasally intubated with flexometallic tube as per institution protocol. The surgical site was cleaned and draped by surgeons. They used povidone-iodine solution followed by isopropyl alcohol solution for cleaning. After preparing the site and allowing at least 2 min drying time, surgery was started. A 5cm skin incision was made using a scalpel in the usual fashion. During the first activation of the electrosurgical unit a muffled “pop” was heard. This was followed almost immediately by the appearance of fire at the head end. Surgeons quickly flushed the fire with saline and removed the burning gauze and drape from patient skin. Fire protocol was activated, oxygen was turned off, and patient was ventilated manually with air using a resuscitation bag. The fire lasted for 10--15 s from ignition to complete extinction resulting in second degree burn. By the time fire was down, the patient suffered second-degree skin burns over face. On careful examination, it was observed that the alcohol solution had seeped into the hair of the patient around the right ear under the drapes. The residual alcohol film on the skin had caught fire from the sparks of the electrocautery igniting the fire. Patient was haemodynamically stable. Surgery was resumed after swiftly painting and draping the surgical site again. After putting down the fire, surgery was completed and patient was extubated and shifted to surgical ICU for postoperative care. Postoperatively on examination by reconstructive surgeons, the patient was found to have sustained second-degree superficial partial thickness burn [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Postoperative image of head and neck showing second-degree superficial partial thickness burn|
Click here to view
Intraoperative fires occur more commonly than most people recognise. Alcohol-based solution is a well-known cause of fire in the OR. The point to consider is that in head and neck surgeries, when alcohol-based preparation is used, it can trickle down into the hair of the patient and may take time to evaporate. Taking all necessary precautions to prevent such fires is most important in all surgeries. Firstly, only as much quantity of alcohol as required should be used and secondly, draping should be done only when residual alcohol vapours get evaporated beneath the hair (especially long hair of female patients).
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Mehta SP, Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Domino KB. Operating room fires: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2013;118:1133-9.
Patel R, Chavda KD, Hukkeri S. Surgical field fire and skin burns caused by alcohol-based skin preparation. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2010;3:305.
] [Full text]