Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 948  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 63  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 602-603  

A simple assessment of cervical range of motion, using indigenous technique (modified analog clinometer)


1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Complex, Tehran, Iran

Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2019

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Zahid Hussain Khan
Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Complex, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_154_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Nashibi M, Mottaghi K, Khan ZH. A simple assessment of cervical range of motion, using indigenous technique (modified analog clinometer). Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:602-3

How to cite this URL:
Nashibi M, Mottaghi K, Khan ZH. A simple assessment of cervical range of motion, using indigenous technique (modified analog clinometer). Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 15];63:602-3. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2019/63/7/602/262607



Sir,

If we have an inquisitive and critical look at the contemporary literature, we will find different gadgets and appliances have been used to assess the cervical range of motion(CROM),[1],[2],[3] in patients before laryngoscopy and intubation is executed. However, each of these gadgets is either cumbersome, costly and thus difficult to employ practically, such as X-ray assessment[4] or of moderate accuracy using goniometer.[5] In the assessment of airway, CROM is important because the lack of CROM is associated with difficult laryngoscopy, intubation and even bag-valve-mask(BVM) ventilation. In order to correctly measure CROM, we have used an indigenous inexpensive appliance called analog clinometer. The device instantaneously provides with the correct measurements of CROM in the neutral, full extension and full flexion views.

This metallic non-expensive device(10$ to 35$ USD) is primarily designed to be used by architects to assess slopes. We have modified it by adding a disposable wooden spatula so it can be used in the assessment of neck flexion and extension range–by putting the spatula between molar teeth or between gums in edentulous patients. Even in limited mouth opening, this device can be utilised properly, as the attached wooden spatula needs just a tiny space equal to 2 to 3mm to be advanced between molar teeth. However, it has limited utility among small children, non-cooperative patients and patients who have arch bars on their teeth.

The clinometer has a semicircle scale from-90°to+90° and a movable marker attached to a bubble containing small transparent cylinder. When the clinometer is put on a slope, by moving the marker, the user adjusts the cylinder to keep the bubble in the middle, so the marker will point the exact degree of that slope [Figure1]. Since it is made of metal and plastic, environmental variables such as barometric pressure, temperature and humidity cannot affect its performance. We used GEO-ALLEN/OEM YR-27 made in China clinometer. [Figure2] depicts the clinometer with an attached dental spatula placed between the last upper and lower molars with the patient in neutral position. [Figure3] reflects the patient in full extension, the bubble reveals an angle of 72° and full flexion, an angle of 58°, respectively. The sum of the angles in extension and flexion gives us a figure of 130°, reflecting that the CROM is adequate for laryngoscopy and intubation.
Figure 1: Shows how a clinometer is utilised to measure the degree of a slope

Click here to view
Figure 2: A spatula attached to the analog clinometer and then modified analog clinometer placed between the upper and lower last molars in the neutral position, with the mouth fully closed

Click here to view
Figure 3: The patient in a full extension and flexion of the neck and the modified analog clinometer showing angles of 72° and 58°, respectively

Click here to view


Compared to the other appliances mentioned above, our new indigenous technique helps in measuring the CROM within less than a minute with a high degree of accuracy and low cost. However, in order to test its true validity and reliability, the device should be tested with the other currently available tools for the assessment of CROM.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
MangoneM, BernettiA, GermanottaM, Di SipioE, RazzanoC, IoppoloF, etal. Reliability of the cervical spine device for the assessment of cervical spine range of motion in asymptomatic participants. JManipulative Physiol Ther 2018;41:342-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
MorenoAJ, UtrillaG, MarinJ, MarinJJ, Sanchez-ValverdeMB, RoyoAC. Cervical spine assessment using passive and active mobilization recorded through an optical motion capture. JChiropr Med 2018;17:167-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
WhitcroftKL, MassouhL, AmirfeyzR, BannisterG. Comparison of methods of measuring active cervical range of motion. Spine 2010;35:E976-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
MachinoM, YukawaY, ImagamaS, ItoK, KatayamaY, MatsumotoT, etal. Age-related and degenerative changes in the osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine: Acomparative study of radiographic data from 1016patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 1230 asymptomatic subjects. Spine 2016;41:476-82.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
ChavesT, NagamineH, BelliJ, de HannaiM, Bevilaqua-GrossiD, de OliveiraA. Confiabilidade da fleximetria e goniometria na avaliação da amplitude de movimento cervical em crianças. Braz J Phys Ther 2008;12:283-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure1], [Figure2], [Figure3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed350    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded92    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal