Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 7918  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81-82  

Bilateral erector spinae catheter placement for bilateral nephrectomy in a paediatric patient


Department of Anaesthesiology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, 26 Chris Hani Road, Diepkloof, Johannesburg 1864, South Africa

Date of Submission19-Aug-2019
Date of Decision14-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance05-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication7-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Megan A Wellbeloved
Department of Anaesthesiology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, 26 Chris Hani Road, Diepkloof, Johannesburg 1864
South Africa
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_628_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Wellbeloved MA, Kemp E. Bilateral erector spinae catheter placement for bilateral nephrectomy in a paediatric patient. Indian J Anaesth 2020;64:81-2

How to cite this URL:
Wellbeloved MA, Kemp E. Bilateral erector spinae catheter placement for bilateral nephrectomy in a paediatric patient. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 27];64:81-2. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2020/64/1/81/275227



Sir,

In recent literature, the use of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for various surgeries has been introduced and discussed.[1] More specifically, ESP is now being used as an analgesic technique in children.[2] We, therefore suggest the use of this block as a safer and efficacious alternative to traditional techniques such as paravertebral and epidural blocks in children.

A 22-month-old, 11.5 kg male infant presented for open, bilateral partial nephrectomy for removal of nephroblastoma. Prior to surgery, informed parental consent for a general anaesthetic along with the placement of bilateral erector spinae catheters was obtained. After induction of anaesthesia and placement of invasive arterial and central venous lines, the patient was then positioned in right lateral decubitus. A linear ultrasound probe (4–12 Hz) was used to identify the right transverse processes and erector spinae muscles at the level of T7/8. A 20-gauge Tuohy epidural needle was inserted in-plane from a cranial to caudad direction under aseptic conditions. Under ultrasound guidance, 10 mL of 0.1% plain bupivacaine (ropivacaine is unavailable in our institution) was injected into the erector spinae fascial plane at the level of T8. The epidural catheter was then inserted into the plane, at a depth of approximately 2.5 cm, without difficulty and secured with a transparent dressing. The same technique was used on the left side at the level of T7 (the change in level is due to a better image being obtained). [Figure 1] shows ultrasound imaging of the transverse processes after the injection of the bolus dose of local anaesthetic and the epidural catheter placement in the patient. Additional analgesia was provided using a dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.3 μg/kg/h and one dose of 1 mg of intravenous morphine. A second bolus dose of 10 mL of 0.1% bupivacaine was given through each catheter towards the end of the procedure.
Figure 1: (a) Ultrasound imaging of transverse process (1) and erector spinae fascial plane with injectate of local anaesthetic (2), (b) Bilateral catheters secured at the level of T7 and T8

Click here to view


An infusion of 3 mL/h of a 0.1% solution of bupivacaine was started in each catheter upon admission to the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and continued for 48 hours post-surgery. Analgesia was deemed to be satisfactory, using physiological parameters and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) score of less than three, with reduced requirements of morphine. The catheters were removed without complications on day 2 post-surgery.

The use of ESP blocks has been increasingly discussed and published in the literature, with indications of use including thoracic, abdominal, upper limb and lower limb surgery.[1] Different mechanisms of action of the ESP block have been suggested and include the spread of local anaesthetic into the paravertebral and epidural space as well as lateral spread to cover lateral cutaneous nerve branches.[1]

The ESP block is potentially a simpler and safer alternative to epidural analgesia or paravertebral block anaesthesia because of the relative ease of visualisation of the transverse processes of the vertebrae and the injection of local anaesthesia at a site distant from the spinal cord, the pleurae and any large vessels.[3],[4] A systematic review by De Cassai et al.[3] reported reduced pain scores and opioid-sparing advantages with a very low complication rate.[3] There is limited data with respect to the use of ESP in children. A retrospective study including 141 paediatric patients on ESP blocks in children reports on the safety of this block and its efficacy in reducing opioid requirements.[2] Other case reports discuss the placement of an ESP catheter and report the benefit of this technique during the postoperative period.[5],[6]

As stated, current evidence is reliant on published case reports and observational studies. Prospective randomised clinical trials are required to establish definitive efficacy and safety of ESP blocks and catheters in paediatric patients.

Declaration of parental consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate consent forms. In the form the Parent's has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their child's images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The parents understand that their child's names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their child's identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Chin KJ, Adhikary SD, Forero M. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block: A new paradigm in regional anesthesia and analgesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2019;9:271-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Asku C, Gurkan Y. Defining the indications and levels of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients: A retrospective study of our current experience. Cureus 2019;11:e5348.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
De Cassai A, Bonvicini D, Correale C, Sandei L, Tulgar S, Tonetti T. Erector spinae plane block: A systematic qualitative review. Minerva Anestesiol 2019;85:308-19.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fang B, Wang Z, Huang X. Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block. An Transl Med 2019;7:174.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Adler AC, Yim MM, Chandrakantan A. Erector spinae catheter for neonatal thoracotomy: A potentially safer alternative to a thoracic epidural. Can J Anesth 2019;66:607-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kaplan I, Jiao Y, AuBuchon JD, Moore RP. Continuous erector spinae plane catheter for analgesia after infant thoracotomy: A case report. A A Pract 2018;11:250-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed285    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded44    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal