Indian Journal of Anaesthesia  
About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions
Home | Login  | Users Online: 1736  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size    




 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 397-402  

A prospective comparative study of arterial blood gas parameters in smoker versus non-smoker patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand; Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission24-Dec-2019
Date of Decision26-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance03-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication1-May-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ajit Kumar
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_953_19

Rights and Permissions
 


Background and Aims: Smoking is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia. These may get amplified with effects of pneumo-peritoneum and carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during laparoscopic surgeries. Our aim was to compare metabolic and blood gas analysis of smokers versus non-smoker patients during laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia. Methods: After permission from institutional review board, 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups, smokers and non-smokers (30 each). Along with baseline haemo-dynamic parameters, arterial blood gas sampling was done to assess and compare PCO2, pH and bicarbonate (HCO3) values at various time intervals with respect to pneumo-peritoneum creation, between smokers and non smokers. Results: Baseline systolic blood pressure was higher and oxygen saturation was significantly lower in smoker group. PCO2and end-tidal CO2were significantly higher in smokers at all intervals (P < 0.001). pH was significantly lower and HCO3higher, in smokers after creation of pneumo-peritoneum. Increase in PCO2 due to pneumo-peritoneum was higher in the smoker group (3.49 ± 8.5) mmHg versus non smoker (0.56 ± 4.86) mmHg, although statistically not significant. Change in pH and HCO3was similar between smokers and non-smokers. Conclusion: There is a significant difference in baseline arterial blood gas characteristics between smokers and non-smokers. Metabolic effects of CO2insufflation and increased intraabdominal pressure appears to be more enhanced in smokers.

Keywords: Blood gas analysis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, pneumoperitoneum, smoking


How to cite this article:
Barik AK, Kumar A, Dhar M, Ranjan P. A prospective comparative study of arterial blood gas parameters in smoker versus non-smoker patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth 2020;64:397-402

How to cite this URL:
Barik AK, Kumar A, Dhar M, Ranjan P. A prospective comparative study of arterial blood gas parameters in smoker versus non-smoker patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 May 30];64:397-402. Available from: http://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2020/64/5/397/283702




   Introduction Top


Laparoscopic procedures have almost completely replaced open procedures in a certain subset of surgeries. One of them includes laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It offers numerous advantages such as smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, postoperative pain and other complications leading to a reduced overall hospital stay.[1] Although this type of surgery is minimally invasive, creation of pneumo-peritoneum and postural changes associated with it causes a number of physiological alterations which may have an effect on the anaesthesia management and warrant specific caution. Absorption of carbon dioxide (CO2) used in insufflation can cause hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis. This further activates the sympathetic nervous and also sensitises the myocardium to catecholamines. This along with a decrease in preload and venous return due to increased intraabdominal pressure may cause a gross decrease in cardiac output.[2],[3],[4]

Tobacco smoking is an internationally accepted health hazard. Its use is estimated to kill nearly six million people worldwide every year. According to the World Health Organization estimates, globally, around 100 million premature deaths occurred due to tobacco in the 20th century. This number is expected to rise to 1 billion during the 21st century. The overall death rate for male smokers is 70% greater than that for male non-smokers.[5] Chronic smoking (more than 20 pack-year at least for 10 years) causes a number of pathological changes in the respiratory system which includes inflammatory changes in the lung parenchyma, the imbalance between protease and anti-protease, oxidative stress, ciliary dysfunction, mucosal hypersecretion, airflow limitation, and pulmonary hypertension.[6],[7] As the lung function is already in a compromised state in chronic smokers, creation of pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgeries in such patients further aggravates and causes an alteration in the acid-base status of the body.

The aim of this study was to compare the changes in metabolic and gas exchange status between

chronic smokers versus non-smokers in patients posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy by analysing blood gas parameters. The objective was to evaluate and compare the effect of insufflated carbon dioxide during laparoscopic cholecystectomy on arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters like PH, PCO2, and bicarbonate (HCO3), during the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative period between smokers and non-smokers. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the change in the above blood gas parameters due to effect of pneumo-peritoneum between smokers and non-smokers.


   Methodology Top


A prospective experimental study was carried out in our tertiary care centre over a period of 15 months, after getting permission from the institutional review board. The study was also registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03133494). 60 participants were finally analysed after the final exclusion of eligible patients at different stages of the study [Figure 1]. Patients who were posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for the study. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients and they were allocated into following two groups; Group I: patients with a history of smoking more than 20 pack-year for more than 10 years and Group II: patients with no history of smoking. Inclusion Criteria was participants aged 20 to 60 years of both sexes planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Exclusion criteria were a patient refusal, ASA 3 and 4, other lung and cardiac pathologies, hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, systemic infection, emergency operation, history of malignancy, history of alcohol or drug abuse.
Figure 1: STROBE flowchart for recruitment of participants

Click here to view


Participants were recruited at the time of pre-anaesthetic evaluation. Along with that general physical examination, systemic examination and airway examination was also performed. Basic laboratory investigations like haemoglobin, total leukocyte count, differential count and platelet count, liver function test, renal function test, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram (ECG) and coagulation profile were done. Smokers were advised to abstain from smoking for at least two weeks prior to surgery and were advised incentive spirometry and nebulisation with broncho-dilators. History of any bleeding diathesis or consumption of any anticoagulants was also ruled out at that time. They were explained about benefits of smoking cessation, and compliance to advice was assessed at the time of admission (generally 1 to 2 days prior) by history and clinically as for any other routine surgery under general anaesthesia.

On the day of surgery patient after confirming fasting status, signed consent and going through the safety checklist, the patient was shifted to the operation theatre. All the standard monitors were attached which includes ECG monitor, pulse oximeter, non-invasive blood pressure and capnography monitor. Baseline haemo-dynamic parameters were recorded. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl (2 μg/kg) was given prior to induction. Surgery was carried out under general anaesthesia with propofol (1–2.5 mg/kg) for induction and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) to facilitate tracheal intubation. After pre-oxygenation with 100% oxygen for 3 min, the trachea was intubated with appropriate size endotracheal tube, which was confirmed by bilateral equal air entry, adequate chest-rise and capnography. Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, air and sevoflurane along with intermittent doses of vecuronium bromide (0.01 mg/kg).

Ventilation was initially maintained with a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg with a respiratory rate of 12/min followed by TV of 6 mL/kg with the rate of 16/min after the creation of pneumoperitoneum (in both groups). Patients were placed in 15–20° reverse Trendelenburg position during surgery. During laparoscopy, intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was maintained at 12 mmHg. For the purpose of the study, we allowed permissive hypercapnia till the point of any haemo-dynamic derangement or prolongation of pneumo-peritoneum (more than 40 min). The CO2 was completely evacuated at the end of surgery. After completion of surgery neuro-muscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. All patients were monitored for 12 h postoperatively.

Before drawing the ABG sample modified Allen's test was performed to check the patency of collateral vessels. Under all aseptic precautions, samples were drawn from the patient after infiltrating the area with 1–2 mL 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (when awake). The sample was drawn in 3 different settings with the help of 2 mL heparinised syringe. The first sample was drawn 10 min before induction, the next sample was drawn 10 min after pneumo-peritoneum and head down position and third and last sample were drawn 30 min after extubation. Demographic parameters, baseline haemodynamic parameters were noted. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) levels were noted before the creation of pneumo-peritoneum, after pneumo-peritoneum and after deflation of pneumo-peritoneum. pH, PCO2 and HCO3 were recorded from the three ABG samples drawn.

Sample size: In a pilot study conducted by us, the response (PCO2) within each subject group was normally distributed with a standard deviation of 7.5 mmHg. To be able to detect a difference in the smoker versus non-smoker groups of 6.53 mmHg (pilot study), we needed to study 28 experimental subjects and 28 control subjects to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the population means of the experimental and control groups are equal with a power 0.9 and type I error of 0.05. A total of 62 participants was the final number to account for 10% attrition.

Statistical Analysis: The statistical analysis was done using SPSS for Windows version 16.0 software. For categorical data, the Chi-square test was used. For comparing two independent study groups unpaired student 't' test was used. Normality of data was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The critical value of 'P' indicating the probability of significant difference was taken as < 0.05 for comparison.


   Results Top


Demographic data: in the smoker group, out of 30 participants 25 were male (83.3%) and 5 were females (16.7%). In the non-smoker group, females (60%) were more than male (40%). Mean duration of pneumo-peritoneum was similar in both groups (25.1 ± 2.93 min in smokers versus 24.96 ± 2.72 min in non-smokers, P value = 0.875). Both groups had no differences in mean age (P = 0.221), [Table 1]. There was no significant difference between mean heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure between two groups. But the difference between systolic blood pressure (P = 0.002) and oxygen saturation were significant (P = 0.001), [Table 1].
Table 1: Comparison of demographic and baseline clinical parameters between smokers and non-smokers

Click here to view


Values of PCO2 and ETCO2 were significantly higher in the smoker group at all stages of sampling and measurement (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mean baseline pH values but was significantly lower in smokers after pneumo-peritoneum and after extubation. Bicarbonate values were significantly higher in the smoker group at all time intervals [Table 2].
Table 2: Comparison of blood gas parameters at various intervals between smokers and non-smokers

Click here to view


Increase in PCO2 due to creation of pneumo-peritoneum was higher in the smoker group, although not statistically significant (P = 0.107). Increase in HCO3 and decrease in pH due to pneumo-peritoneum was similar in both smokers and non-smokers [Table 3].
Table 3: Comparison of change in blood gas parameters due to pneumo-peritoneum between smokers and non-smokers

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


There have been numerous studies conducted to analyse the effect of pneumo-peritoneum on clinical and biochemical parameters.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have analysed the effect of chronic smoking on such surgeries and on the changes produced by the effect of CO2 and pneumo-peritoneum,[13],[14],[15] more so on biochemical changes. Smoking is known to decrease pulmonary function and is associated with physical abnormalities of the chest wall. Reduction in chest expansion arising from reduced flexibility could lead to a vulnerability to CO2 retention.[16],[17] Robot-assisted pelvic laparoscopic surgeries, which may extend for longer durations can further increase chances of postoperative pulmonary complications, especially in smokers.[18]

In the current study, no differences were observed in baseline hemodynamic parameters except systolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in the smoker group possibly due to the effect of stimulation of the sympathetic system in such patients. Oxygen saturation was lower in the smoker group, which is also in keeping with most literature including a study published by Tait et al. on smokers undergoing general anaesthesia.[7]

The relationship between ETCO2 and PCO2 during laparoscopic surgeries is well established.[19] In the present study, ETCO2 and PCO2 values were significantly higher in the smoker group at all time intervals including the baseline. Kelman et al. in a study on arterial blood gas tension during laparoscopy observed that there was a significant increase in ETCO2 from the baseline (34 ± 0) at 30 and 40 min interval (39 ± 0.4) and (41 ± 03), respectively after insufflations and after exsufflation the ETCO2 became comparable with the baseline (36 ± 0.8).[8] Although not observed in smokers these findings are in keeping with the present study.

In our current study, pH values were significantly lower and bicarbonate was significantly higher during the period of pneumo-peritoneum in the smoker group compared to non-smokers. This is in keeping with the higher chances of metabolic acidosis which may occur due to the effects of CO2 insufflation and hypoventilation during such surgeries. A study by Zulfikaroglu et al. also brought out similar metabolic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, although not specifically in smokers.[10]

In the current study, the change in PCO2 value due to the effect of pneumo-peritoneum in the smoker group was higher than a non-smoker, which although not statistically significant, indicates that CO2 retention may be more common in smokers undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Similarly, change in pH and bicarbonate due to effect of pneumo-peritoneum was also not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers. The reason for this might be the shorter duration of these surgeries and head-up position; which might not be sufficient to bring out any substantial or significant metabolic difference between smokers and non-smokers.

Graybill et al. in a study assessing peri-operative outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic procedures concluded no significant difference between smokers and non-smokers.[14] In contrast, Landin et al. found smoking to be a modifiable risk factor in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeries and found a significant association between smoking and postoperative pulmonary complications.[15]

Limitations of the study were as follows. PO2 changes were not analysed. This was a single-centre study; multi-centric studies can be planned in the future. Gender distribution was not similar in the two study groups. Duration of surgeries was not long enough to be able to appreciate the significant change in blood gas parameters with the effect of pneumo-peritoneum. Head up surgical position might offset effects of increased IAP, and thus may not produce significant effects as compared to other laparoscopic procedures like urological surgeries requiring head-down tilt. Also, most of the smokers were optimised prior to surgery, thus stark differences due to any acute changes could not have been demonstrated due to ethical issues related to the continuation of smoking in the peri-operative period.


   Conclusions Top


There is a significant difference in baseline arterial blood gas characteristics between smokers and non-smokers. Metabolic effects of CO2 insufflation and increased IAP appear to be more enhanced in smokers. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because of its shorter duration and head-up position may offset the effects of pneumo-peritoneum and CO2 retention to a certain extent. Smokers coming for laparoscopic surgery should be optimised aggressively, with special caution in longer duration surgeries with steep positions.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Gonzalez R, Smith CD, McClusky DA III, Ramaswamy A. Laparoscopic approach reduces likelihood of perioperative complications in patients undergoing adrenalectomy. Am Surg 2004;70:668-74.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T, et al. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg 2004;21:95-105.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Larsen JF, Svendsen FM, Pedersen V. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of pneumoperitoneum on cardiac function and haemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2004;91:848-54.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kraut EJ, Anderson JT, Safwat A, Barbosa R, Wolfe BM. Impairment of cardiac performance by laparoscopy in patients receiving positive endexpiratory pressure. Arch Surg 1999;134:76-80.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mishra GA, Pimple SA, Shastri SS. An overview of the tobacco problem in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012;33:139-45.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Kuznetsova TD, Erikova LV, Sokolov EV. [Effect of smoking on the respiratory function of the lungs in adolescents]. Pediatriia 1985:26-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tait AR, Kyff JV, Crider B, Santibhavank V, Learned D, Finch JS. Changes in arterial oxygen saturation in cigarette smokers following general anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:423-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kelman GR, Swappy GH, Smith I, Benzie RJ, Gordon NL. Cardiac output and arterial blood-gas tension during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1972;44:1155-62.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Iwasaka H, Miyakawa H, Yamamoto H, Kitano T, Taniguchi K, Honda N. Respiratory mechanics and arterial blood gases during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:129-33.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zulfikaroglu B, Koc M, Soran A, Isman FK, Cinel I. Evaluation of oxidative stress in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 2002;32:869-74.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Critchley LA, Critchley JA, Gin T. Haemodynamic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholescystectomy: Measurement by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:681-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Chopra G, Singh DK, Jindal P, Sharma UC, Sharma JP. Haemodynamic, end-tidal carbon dioxide, saturated pressure of oxygen and electrocardiogram changes in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: A comparative clinical evaluation. Int J Anesthesiol 2008;16.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Taber DJ, Ashcraft E, Cattanach LA, Baillie GM, Weimert NA, Lin A, et al. No difference between smokers, former smokers, or nonsmokers in the operative outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:153-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Graybill WS, Frumovitz M, Nick AM, Wei C, Mena GE, Soliman PT,et al. Impact of smoking on perioperative pulmonary and upper respiratory complications after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:556-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Landin M, Kubasiak JC, Schimpke S, Poirier J, Myers JA, Millikan KW, et a l. The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: A review of the NSQIP dataset. Surg Endosc 2017;31:917-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tantisuwat A, Thaveeratitham P. Effects of smoking on chest expansion, lung function, and respiratory muscle strength of youths. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:167-70.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kuperman AS, Riker JB. The variable effect of smoking on pulmonary function. Chest 1973;63:655-60.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Pramanik M, Sarkar A, Gupta A, Chattopadhyay M. Postoperative pulmonary complications in robot-assisted uro-oncological surgeries: Our experience in a tertiary cancer care centre. Indian J Anaesth 2020;64:238-41.  Back to cited text no. 18
  [Full text]  
19.
Jayan N, Jacob JS, Mathew M. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic nephrectomy: Does end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement correlate with arterial carbon dioxide measurement? Indian J Anaesth 2018;62:298-302.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methodology
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed264    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded72    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal