• Users Online: 642
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 455-462

Sufentanil Vs Fentanyl for Fast-Track Cardiac Anaesthesia


1 Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, T N Medical College, Mumbai, India
2 P.G Student, Department of Anaesthesiology, B Y LNair Hospital, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
C M Deshpande
2124, HajiAli Govt. Colony, K.KhadyeMarg, Mumbai-400 034
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 20640208

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

A perioperative anaesthetic management that aims to facilitate tracheal extubation of patients within 1-6 hrs after cardiac surgery is called "fast-track'. Main advantage of 'fast-track" method is better usage of medical resources and lowering hospital costs without increasing morbidity and mortality of the patients. Standard fast-track protocols contain short acting anaesthetic agents, smaller incisions and decreased pump times without hypothermia. In this study we compared two short acting opioid drugs, fentanyl versus Sufentanil when used as a part of the balanced anaesthesia technique for fast track in cardiac surgery patients& evaluated the time taken for extubation, haemodynamic stability, analgesia requirements& incidence of awareness. The results from the study show thatboth agents provide good haemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia. Although Sufentanil provides earlier extuba­tion, both agents reduce the ICU stay equally. In conclusion both agents can be used effectively for fasttrack cardiac anaesthesia.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2722    
    Printed121    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded492    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal