• Users Online: 1161
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
MEDICOLEGAL ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 183 Table of Contents     

Vicarious liability - Medicolegal status of anaesthesiologist


Mahadeva Nilaya, Training College Road, Behind K.C. Park, Dharwad - 580 008, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication24-May-2010

Correspondence Address:
Shivakumar Kumbar
Mahadeva Nilaya, Training College Road, Behind K.C. Park, Dharwad - 580 008, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kumbar S. Vicarious liability - Medicolegal status of anaesthesiologist. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:183

How to cite this URL:
Kumbar S. Vicarious liability - Medicolegal status of anaesthesiologist. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Oct 24];54:183. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2010/54/2/183/63647

He who does an act through another is in law deemed to have done it himself. Liability for another's wrongful acts or omission can arise in following:

  1. when the liability is ratified,
  2. when the liability accrues by abetment,
  3. when the liability arises out of a special relationship.
If an anaesthesiologist administers an improper anaesthetic at the surgeon's instance, it is he who is liable, not the surgeon. If the anaesthesiologist is questioned as to the agent or technique by surgeon, it is better that he should offer to withdraw from that case.

Docrine of vicarious liability is not applicable to criminal liability. If a senior anaesthesiologist delegates his task to his junior, nursing staff or to any doctor, then for their wrongdoings, the senior anaesthesiologist is responsible. The hospital may be held directly responsible for faulty premises, equipments, inadequate or unqualified staff or other organisational errors, and also, the anaesthesiologist and surgeon. The only exception may be where the consultants use the premises only for their consultation. The hospital is liable for the negligence of the surgeon and it is no more a defence to say that the surgeon is not a servant employed by the hospital. Hospital is liable to the patient for the injury caused to him/her by the negligence of the surgeons, nurses, anaesthesiologist and the members of the hospital in the course of their work. If the staff of the hospital administered wrong injection supplied by the hospital pharmacist without properly reading the prescription, the hospital is held liable for the negligence of its pharmacist and the staff.

In surgical cases, usually the contract is between the surgeon and the patient only. The anaesthesiologist and other doctors may not be party. The anaesthesiologist has an implied contract with surgeon as far as the patient is concerned. Moreover, the surgeon may be vicariously liable for their negligence. However, if the patient arranges his own anaesthesiologist, a separate contract gets established between them and in such cases the surgeon is not liable for the negligence of the anaesthesiologist. Modern surgery is truly a team effort and the anaesthesiologist is registered and well-qualified professional. Usually, a common consent is mostly taken for both surgery and anaesthesia. But a separate consent for anaesthesia may be legally more sound and valid. The choice of an anaesthetic is primarily the anaesthesiologist's choice and the surgeon should not and cannot commit him to a specific anaesthetic approach.


   Cases Top


Dr. P. Narasimharao V/s Gundamarappa Jayaprakash [1990(1) ACJ350AIR 1990 AP 207]. Patient underwent tonsillectomy and there was a delay on the part of the anaesthesiologist in noticing respiratory arrest which led to cardiac arrest and subsequently hypoxic brain damage occurred. AP High Court held that both surgeon and anaesthesiologist were negligent and passed a decree in favor of the plaintiff.

A paediatric surgeon operated on a child for hernia. Both the legs of the child were burnt by keeping extremely hot water bags during the operation. Here, the anaesthesiologist and surgeon and hospital were held vicariously liable.[4]

 
   References Top

1.Gupta R. Medico legal aspects of surgery. JAYPEE publications, New Delhi,first edition, p.111.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Singh J. Medical negligence and compensation. Bharat law publications, Jaipur, 3rd edition reprint 2007, p.13-72.5,13-72.9,5-3.10.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Shenoy G. Anesthesiologist and Law: Medical negligence. Ritanjan publications Bombay, 2002 edition pg 36 & 37.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Jaiswal JVN. Doctors in the doc. Jaypee publications New Delhi, 1st edition 2004. p. 220&308.  Back to cited text no. 4      



This article has been cited by
1 Vicarious liability
Parakh, S.C.
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010; 54(6): 591
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Cases
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3253    
    Printed70    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded663    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal