• Users Online: 2408
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 263 Table of Contents     

Utility of BIS for sedation management during monitored anaesthesia care

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India

Date of Web Publication10-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
Satyen Parida
JIPMER Campus, Dhanvantari Nagar, Pondicherry- 605 006
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.65350

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Parida S. Utility of BIS for sedation management during monitored anaesthesia care. Indian J Anaesth 2010;54:263

How to cite this URL:
Parida S. Utility of BIS for sedation management during monitored anaesthesia care. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2010 [cited 2021 Mar 8];54:263. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2010/54/3/263/65350


I read with interest the article titled "Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation during Regional Anaesthesia" by Khurana et al. published in December 2009 issue of IJA. [1] I congratulate the authors on their well-conceived study. However, the comparability of bispectral index (BIS) values between the two stated anaesthetic agents deserves some comment.

Several reports have suggested that BIS measurements may not be independent of the drug used. There is evidence that BIS is influenced by the choice of anaesthetic agent. In a study conducted by Ibrahim et al.[2] wherein the BIS values during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam and propofol were compared, BIS of sevoflurane and propofol patients frequently decreased to less than 60, whereas the BIS of midazolam patients was never less than 65 despite several patients being unresponsive. In addition, mean BIS scores of patients sedated with sevoflurane and 'responding to name when called repeatedly' (responders) were significantly different from the BIS scores of midazolam and propofol responders, and BIS scores of propofol nonresponders were significantly different from those of sevoflurane and midazolam nonresponders. They also demonstrated that BIS was a slightly more accurate predictor of depth of sedation with propofol than sevoflurane or midazolam. Mi et al. [3] found BIS values at unresponsiveness to voice command were 66 with propofol alone compared with 75 when propofol was administered with fentanyl. Kearse et al. [4] found a BIS 50 (BIS at which 50% of patients were unresponsive) of 65 for propofol alone but 76 for propofol with nitrous oxide. Iselin-Chaves et al. [5] reported a BIS 50 of 64 for propofol alone and 72 for propofol with alfentanil.

As per the study protocol, the initial BIS targeted in both the midazolam and propofol groups was 75, with infusions manipulated intra-operatively to maintain BIS values in the 65-85 range. The incidence of awareness has been stated to be 20% in the midazolam group and 16.7% in the propofol group.

However, in view of the above evidence, identical BIS values may not necessarily indicate identical levels of sedation for both midazolam and propofol as understood in clinical parlance. The authors' concern that assessment of depth of sedation by clinical means may itself alter such a depth is no doubt valid. Despite such concerns, however, it would have been interesting to note the levels of sedation at identical BIS levels for both groups and infer there from. Furthermore, the methods by which awareness during sedation, as defined by recall of intraoperative events, in the study under discussion were assessed, probably required greater elaboration. In this regard, specific memory tests for immediate and delayed recall as utilized by Ibrahim et al. [2] might have helped pick up differences in awareness between the two groups much better.

   References Top

1.Khurana P, Agarwal A, Verma RK, Agarwal PK. Comparison of midazolam and propofol for bis-guided sedation during regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth 2009;53:662-6.  Back to cited text no. 1    Medknow Journal  
2.Ibrahim AE, Taraday JK, Kharasch ED. Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam, and propofol. Anesthesiology 2001;95:1151-9.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Mi WD, Sakai T, Singh H, Kudo T, Kudo M, Matsuki A. Hypnotic endpoints vs the bispectral index, 95% spectral edge frequency and median frequency for adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by the bispectral index monitor. Anesthesiology 2001;94:799-803.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Kearse LA Jr, Rosow C, Zaslavsky A, Connors P, Dershwitz M, Denman W. Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis. Anesthesiology 1998;88:25-34.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Iselin-Chaves IA, Flaishon R, Sebel PS, Howell S, Gan TJ, Sigl J, et al. The effect of the interaction of the propofol and alfentanil on recall, loss of consciousness, and the bispectral index. Anesth Analg 1998;87:949-55.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded395    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal