• Users Online: 1562
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 54  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 558-561

A comparative study of efficacy of propofol auto-co-induction versus midazolam propofol co-induction using the priming principle


Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Jaipur Golden Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Roopam Kataria
9 Popular Apartments, Sector 13, Rohini, Delhi-85
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.72647

Rights and Permissions

Application of priming principle is well documented in relation to the use of muscle relaxants. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of priming technique in relation to induction agents. Clinical efficacy in terms of dose reduction and alteration in peri-intubation haemodynamics was compared in propofol auto-co-induction and midazolam propofol co-induction groups along with a control group. The study was carried out in 90 patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery, who were randomly divided into three equal groups. Group I received 0.5 mg/kg propofol IV (20% of the pre-calculated induction dose), group II received 0.05 mg/kg IV midazolam and group III received 3 ml of normal saline. This was followed by IV induction with propofol 2 minutes later in all the three groups at a predetermined rate till the bispectral index value of 45 was attained. The results showed a significant decrease in induction dose requirement in both the groups but haemodynamic stability during induction and intubation was more in propofol auto-co-induction group.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3235    
    Printed115    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded784    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal