• Users Online: 1513
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 86-87  

Unilateral laparotomy under paravertebral block in a desperate situation


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Command Hospital Air Force, Domlur, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, AJ Institute of Medical Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication13-Feb-2014

Correspondence Address:
Rajesh K Lalla
Department of Anaesthesiology, Command Hospital Air Force, Domlur, Agaram Post, Bengaluru, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.126839

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Lalla RK, Koteswara CM, Ananth S. Unilateral laparotomy under paravertebral block in a desperate situation. Indian J Anaesth 2014;58:86-7

How to cite this URL:
Lalla RK, Koteswara CM, Ananth S. Unilateral laparotomy under paravertebral block in a desperate situation. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Oct 22];58:86-7. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2014/58/1/86/126839

Sir,

An anaesthesiologist is often faced with a seriously ill-patient in whom any form of anaesthesia is hazardous. The problem is multiplied when faced in a remote hospital where facilities are limited. We present a case of a 78-year-old patient with pancreatic abscess in severe septicaemic shock requiring emergency exploratory laparotomy.

The patient presented to a remote armed forces hospital with pain abdomen of 20 days duration. He appeared toxic and in a debilitated state. There was a history of chronic consumption of alcohol for over 50 years. On examination, there was generalised abdominal tenderness. He was febrile with temperature 102°F. His pulse was 114/min, weak and thready. On admission, systolic blood pressure (BP) was 65 mmHg, and diastolic BP was not recordable. Investigations showed Hb 7.8 g%, total leucocyte count of 14,000 mm−3 , blood urea nitrogen 64 mg%, serum creatinine 2.8 mg%, alanine aminotransferase 254 IU and aspartate aminotransferase 306 IU, Serum amylase 408 IU, serum bilirubin 1.6 mg%, albumin 2.8 mg%. His SpO 2 was 86% on room air. International normalised ratio was 1.3. Chest X-ray revealed features of acute respiratory distress syndrome. He was placed on inotropic support with injection noradrenaline 6 μg/min, injection dobutamine 15 μg/min and inj. dopamine 20 μg/min, but BP was still low around 85/44 mmHg. His sensorium was obtunded but he was arousable. He was diagnosed as a case of pancreatic abscess and was posted for emergency exploratory laparotomy. In view of haemodynamic compromise, he was not likely to sustain intravenous or inhalational induction. Similarly, central neuraxial blockade was assessed to be hazardous in view of the associated sympathetic blockade.

In this desperate situation, it was decided to attempt unilateral right thoracolumbar paravertebral blockade and to limit incision and surgery to one half of the abdomen only. He was accepted under American Society of Anaesthesiologists P S Grade 5 (emergency) and the prognosis and approach was explained to the patient and his next of kin. Paravertebral block was administered at T12/L1 level with an 18 G Touhy needle. 40 ml of solution containing 17 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 7 ml 2% lignocaine in 16 ml normal saline was injected in graded doses. The height of block was titrated to achieve a block extending uptil T4. 40 ml was chosen as paravertebral block requires higher volume to achieve adequate spread to cover the necessary number of nerves in this case.A sensory block from T4 till L2 level was achieved on one side over 10 min after the beginning of injection. In view of critical nature of the patient, no intravenous analgesic was administered. Only 100% O 2 was administered by face mask intra-operatively. BP was maintained with inotropic support and the surgery was allowed to proceed. The incision was paramedian from subcostal margin to 2 inches below level of umbilicus to enable drainage of pancreatic abscess. Monitoring included SpO 2 , electrocardiography and non-invasive blood pressure. There were no facilities for monitoring arterial blood gases or invasive BP. The SpO 2 remained between 92% and 96%. His haemodynamics remained steady during the procedure. The surgery was restricted to right half of abdomen. The pus was drained and abdominal lavage was given and abdomen closed after placing drains. Total surgical time was 35 min. The patient was shifted to intensive care unit under cover of inotropic support. Post-operative analgesia was administered as 0.125% bupivicaine infusion at 3 ml/h via catheter using disposable elastomeric pump for 48 h. He improved over the next week and the inotropes were gradually weaned off. His liver and renal parameters also improved. He was discharged from hospital on 12 th post-operative day.

Paravertebral blocks have been utilised for providing analgesia for chest and abdominal surgical procedures for many years. [1],[2],[3],[4] and have lower incidence of complications. It has also been used in a septic patient with mild coagulopathy. [5] A large volume of local anaesthetic solution can be injected blocking multiple levels of paravertebral nerves. The advantages include haemodynamic stability due to the sparing of the sympathetic chain of the uninjected side. Various surgeries described under such blocks include mastectomies, inguinal herniorrhaphies, etc., Laparotomy is not performed usually under paravertebral block as it would entail a bilateral block where the advantage of sympathetic preservation would be lost. We were in a desperate situation when routine anaesthesia techniques were deemed hazardous to the patient. A decision to attempt unilateral surgery under paravertebral block was made. Adequate sensory block was obtained; abdominal relaxation was not optimum for a classic laparotomy but allowed conditions for pus drainage on the affected side. This procedure certainly cannot be recommended for all laparotomies but it may be considered as an option in such situations, provided the surgeon restricts the procedure aimed at immediate retrieval of patient.

 
   References Top

1.Tsai T, Rodriguez-Diaz C, Deschner B, Thomas K, Wasnick JD. Thoracic paravertebral block for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and laser lead extraction. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:379-82.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Mehta Y, Arora D, Sharma KK, Mishra Y, Wasir H, Trehan N. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2008;11:91-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.Falkensammer J, Hakaim AG, Klocker J, Biebl M, Lau LL, Neuhauser B, et al. Paravertebral blockade with propofol sedation versus general anesthesia for elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular 2006;14:17-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Rudkin GE, Gardiner SE, Cooter RD. Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block for abdominoplasty. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:54-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Visoiu M, Yang C. Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral continuous nerve blocks for a mildly coagulopathic patient undergoing exploratory laparotomy for bowel resection. Paediatr Anaesth 2011;21:459-62.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1752    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded295    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal