|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 684-692
Neurological deterioration during intubation in cervical spine disorders
Padmaja Durga1, Barada Prasad Sahu2
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
|Date of Web Publication||17-Dec-2014|
Dr. Padmaja Durga
Department of Anaesthesiology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad - 500 089, Telangana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Anaesthesiologists are often involved in the management of patients with cervical spine disorders. Airway management is often implicated in the deterioration of spinal cord function. Most evidence on neurological deterioration resulting from intubation is from case reports which suggest only association, but not causation. Most anaesthesiologists and surgeons probably believe that the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) during intubation is largely due to mechanical compression produced by movement of the cervical spine. But it is questionable that the small and brief deformations produced during intubation can produce SCI. Difficult intubation, more frequently encountered in patients with cervical spine disorders, is likely to produce greater movement of spine. Several alternative intubation techniques are shown to improve ease and success, and reduce cervical spine movement but their role in limiting SCI is not studied. The current opinion is that most neurological injuries during anaesthesia are the result of prolonged deformation, impaired perfusion of the cord, or both. To prevent further neurological injury to the spinal cord and preserve spinal cord function, minimizing movement during intubation and positioning for surgery are essential. The features that diagnose laryngoscopy induced SCI are myelopathy present on recovery, short period of unconsciousness, autonomic disturbances following laryngoscopy, cranio-cervical junction disease or gross instability below C3. It is difficult to accept or refute the claim that neurological deterioration was induced by intubation. Hence, a record of adequate care at laryngoscopy and also perioperative period are important in the event of later medico-legal proceedings.
Keywords: Cervical spine, instability, movement, neurological deterioration, stenosis, tracheal intubation
|How to cite this article:|
Durga P, Sahu BP. Neurological deterioration during intubation in cervical spine disorders. Indian J Anaesth 2014;58:684-92
| Introduction|| |
Anaesthesiologists are often involved in the management of patients with cervical spine disorders. The most crucial step in managing these patients is the prevention of further insult to the cervical spine (C-spine). Patients sometimes deteriorate neurologically during the perioperative period. Airway management is frequently implicated in the neurological deterioration. However, there have only been a few case reports of possible damage to the spinal cord from intubation. ,,,,,,,, There are no randomised studies involving intubation in actual spine pathology, and it is very hard to imagine an Ethical Committee approving such a trial. There are several reports of safety of laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine injury as well. ,,,,,,,,, Hence, it is difficult to implicate intubation as a sole contributor to spinal cord injury (SCI). The natural course of the pathology, surgical insult and the haemodynamic changes may also contribute to neurological deterioration. However, the emphasis is mostly on the cervical movements during intubation. Literature shows that intubation is easier and cervical movement is lesser with the alternative techniques to laryngoscopy for intubation. However, there is no clear evidence that cervical movements produced during intubation cause SCI or that the injury has been reduced by techniques that reduce cervical movement during intubation. This should not underscore the need to exert caution while intubating patients with cervical spine disorders. The knowledge of individual factors potentially contributing to injury and population at risk for new onset cervical injury is important for anaesthesia providers to manage the patients with cervical spine disorders and also lessen the culpability and legal risk.
This review focuses on what currently exists in the literature regarding neurological deterioration following intubation and address certain dogmas that surround intubation and cervical spine.
| Definition of Cervical Instability|| |
Cervical instability is defined as loss of the ability under normal physiologic loads to maintain relationships between vertebrae in such a way that there is either initial or subsequent damage to the spinal cord or nerve roots, and there is development of incapacitating deformity or severe pain  [Table 1]. Clinical cervical spine instability is often difficult to diagnose and may involve subtle clinical features. Many times intubation may be required even before the spine is cleared for instability. It must also be emphasised that spinal stability does not confer immunity from risk of injury. Intraoperative SCI and neurological deterioration can occur even in the absence of cervical instability. ,,,,
| Evidence of Cervical Injury Following Intubation|| |
Most evidence on neurological deterioration resulting from intubation is from case reports as double-blinded trial is ethically not feasible in this area of anaesthetic practice. The actual number of published reports is small. The reasons may be either due to the low incidence of perioperative cervical cord injury or these incidents may not be reported due to potential or actual medical mal-practice liability. The published reports are summarised in [Table 2]. Most of the reports describe only a temporal association between a devastating deterioration in neurological function and the airway management but not causation.
|Table 2: Summary of published reports of new neurological deficit following intubation|
Click here to view
Approximately, 5% of patients admitted with traumatic cervical injury will deteriorate neurologically.  It is possible that the episode of neurological deterioration might coincide with an anaesthetic. In most reports there was a pre-existing unrecognised damage to the spinal cord that may have worsened during the procedure to create an impression that airway management resulted in injury. ,, It is also possible that when there is no suspicion of cervical spine abnormality protective measures would not have been undertaken. There are reports of SCI even without intubation.  There are reports of cord injury in normal subjects after prolonged  or even short periods of extreme spinal deformation.  However, it is hard to point to any convincing report of an actual case of neurological deterioration due to intubation.
The general anaesthesia claims in the closed claims database between 1970 and 2007 was reviewed by Hindman et al.  The closed claims database contains even the unreported events. The airway management was implicated in only 11% of the claims. Probable contributors to cord injury included anatomic abnormalities (81%), direct surgical complications (24%) (38% were cervical spine procedures), pre-procedural symptomatic cord injury (19%), intraoperative head/neck position (19%), and airway management (11%).  The causes of canal stenosis should generate equal concern in addition to instability.
| Possible Mechanism of Spinal Injury During Intubation|| |
It is important to understand about experimental and clinical evidence about the induction of acute myelopathy during intubation. Although unproven, the current opinion is that most neurological injuries during anaesthesia are the result of prolonged deformation, impaired perfusion of the cord, or both.
Cervical movements during intubation
There are frequent publications that describe the extent to which various routinely used airway management techniques angulate the C spine. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The available evidence suggests that, in unstable cervical spines, basic airway manoeuvres such as chin lift and jaw protrusion cause as much displacement as direct laryngoscopy. ,, However, the necessity of basic airway management cannot be avoided whenever a patient is anaesthetised. It can be argued that airway devices should be placed in the awake patient. However, there is no evidence that using an awake procedure results in better neurological outcome. The analysis of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists closed claims contained several examples of serious morbidity and mortality caused by awake fibreoptic intubation. 
The majority of cervical spinal movement occurring during direct laryngoscopy is concentrated in the upper cervical spine. There is minimal movement below C3. , Since the movement during laryngoscopy is concentrated in the occipito-atlanto-axial (OAA) complex,  diseases at this level are at greater risk of SCI. The movement of unstable spine might be different, but it is difficult to study the unstable spine. Most data regarding cervical movement is from trials of uninjured patients or cadaveric models of destabilised cervical spine. ,,, The magnitude of movement during airway management rarely exceeds the physiological limits of the spine. Lennarson et al. studied movements at C5-C6 before and after surgical destabilisation of cadavers.  They found a difference of <2 mm translation and 4° angulation between the stable and unstable spine. It is therefore questionable that these small deformations produced for a brief few seconds can produce SCI. Movement is reduced by in-line immobilisation,  but traction forces cause clinically important distraction  and should be avoided.
Contribution of vascular compromise to spinal cord injury
The contribution of vascular compromise to SCI during anaesthesia is most often under-emphasized while the consequences of movement over-emphasised. The duration of compression is an important factor unless the deformation is extreme. It is believed that prolonged compression and/or stretching of nervous tissue even to a minor degree eventually result in hypoperfusion of the cord.  The compression of the cord during laryngoscopy has not been quantified. Flexion of the spine causes elongation of the cord with narrowing of the diameter of longitudinal vessels and extension causes increase in the cord diameter and folding of ligamentum flavum, which exerts pressure on the cord and posterior longitudinal vessels. Flow through radicular vessels is believed to be obstructed during cervical movement. Alteration of spinal curvature can increase cerebrospinal fluid pressure and reduce cord perfusion pressure by 20 mm Hg.  However, limited available evidence suggests that allowing some flexion or extension of the head is unlikely to cause secondary injury and may facilitate prompt intubation in difficult cases. Patients with pre-existing myelopathy are probably at greater risk.
| Safety of Laryngoscopy in Unstable Cervical Spine|| |
The potential merits and dangers of laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with injury to the cervical spine or spinal cord continue to be debated. The reports of safe use of direct laryngoscopy are given in [Table 3].
It is important to note that the intubations were performed by experienced personnel in all these reports with maintenance of stabilisation. They reported no statistically significant difference in neurological deterioration between intubated and un-intubated patients with critical cervical spine injury.  There were no differences in neurological outcome whether intubation was performed while the patient was awake or under general anaesthesia, or comparing oral tracheal intubation with other techniques. ,, Shatney et al. have reported safety of orotracheal intubation in patients with unstable high cervical fractures.  It is expected that undiagnosed cervical spine injury requiring immediate airway control would have a worse neurological outcome. However, no worsening of neurological outcomes occurred in patients managed with emergency orotracheal intubation in hitherto unrecognised cervical spine injury.  While it will never be possible to prove that direct laryngoscopy is completely safe, it is accepted that establishing a tracheal airway takes precedence over theoretical risks in practice.
| Need for Alternative Airway Management in Cervical Spine Disorders|| |
Cervical spine disorders can be associated with difficult intubation. Pre-anaesthetic prediction of difficult laryngoscopy remains problematic.  A poor glottic view could pose a hazard to patients with unstable cervical spines if/when the laryngoscopist applies additional force in attempts to improve glottic visualisation.
Causes for difficult airway management in cervical spine disorders
There may be greater difficulty in obtaining a good laryngeal exposure when manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is applied.  Ethical and methodologic constraints preclude controlled trials of MILS though recent work questions its effectiveness. Cervical spine disease is in itself a cause of difficult direct laryngoscopy. Lesions affecting the OAA complex are the most likely to result in difficult laryngoscopy.  Iatrogenic causes (fixators, collars) and arthritic processes are additional contributing factors.  Reduced mouth opening often compounds the problem of poor OAA extension. Arthritic involvement of the temporo-mandibular joint (TMJ) may be present, but OAA extension is necessary for normal mouth opening even in subjects with normal TMJ. 
Alternatives to direct laryngoscopy
Despite the presumed safety and efficacy of direct laryngoscopy with MILS, persevering with difficult direct laryngoscopy may be unsafe in many patients, particularly 'unstable' patients who are functionally preserved. Alternative techniques that do not require direct visualisation warrant investigation. Safety of awake fibreoptic intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders is established. Promising alternative techniques include intubation through supraglottic airways, lightwand, optical stylets, Bullard laryngoscope, intubating laryngeal mask airway, with/without fibreoptic guidance, C-Traq, video laryngoscopes such as Glidescope Airway Scope, Airtraq. The cervical movement with the alternative techniques of intubation are summarised in [Table 4]. The indirect techniques for tracheal intubation cause less cervical movement than does the direct laryngoscope. Fibreoptic stylets and periscope-like devices allow trained clinicians to apply MILS and obtain better visualization, possibly with less force. However, there is lack of evidence that one method of airway management in patients with cervical disease is better than another in terms of efficacy, safety and neurological outcome. Practitioners should use a technique in which they are competent.
|Table 4: Comparison of cervical movement of airway management techniques|
Click here to view
| Prevention of Neurological Deterioration|| |
McLeod and Calder  identified features that diagnose laryngoscopy induced SCI as myelopathy present on recovery, short period of unconsciousness, autonomic disturbances following laryngoscopy, cranio-cervical junction disease or gross instability below C3. The problem with anaesthesia is that it results in loss of consciousness and the ability to detect the consequences. It is therefore prudent to focus on prevention of neurological injury.
Reduction of movement
We should attempt to minimise movement of the head and neck during airway management, as studies in cadavers and anaesthetised patients have shown that some movement of the cervical spine occurs during all airway manoeuvres including insertion of an airway.
Prolonged minor malposition may be the cause of some cord injuries so, as far as requirements for surgery render possible, the position should look comfortable. Any position that looks uncomfortable must be avoided.
Maintaining spinal cord perfusion
Spinal cord injury leads to profound haemodynamic changes due to vascular, cardiac and autonomic dysfunction.  It causes reduction in spinal cord blood flow autoregulation and carbon dioxide reactivity, which are closely related to the severity of injury.  Manipulating physiological parameters such as mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and intrathecal pressure may be beneficial for patients with an SCI.
Maintenance of normotension
Most patients will have some degree of cord or root compression, and it is important to maintain a good perfusion pressure. Maintaining normotension under anaesthesia is usually difficult and might involve inotrope infusions. Hypertension may, in theory at least, promote cord swelling in damaged areas.  Surgical bleeding may also demand a lower than normal pressure. In practice, a systolic pressure of >100 mm Hg and MABP of 80-85 mm Hg is the aim in normotensive patients.  The blood supply to the spinal cord is believed to be similar to the cerebral circulation in terms of regulation of flow. Though it has been suggested that a watershed (area of relatively reduced reliability of perfusion) exists at the cervico-thoracic junction recent report suggests that the cord is most likely to suffer ischaemic events at the C2-C3 level. 
| Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury Recognized Post-Operatively|| |
There are no firm guidelines available, hence only treatment options are listed based on several steps that can be taken to help minimize damage from the secondary cascade following recognition of an intraoperative SCI or postoperatively recognised SCI.
Early recognition is important to reduce the impact of the injury as soon as possible. MABP should be maintained above 80-85 mm Hg and the haematocrit should be corrected. Treatment with methyl prednisolone sodium succinate (MPSS) can also be initiated as soon as possible after identification of the SCI though there is no firm evidence for its use in this setting. Based on the recommendations of Bracken  a 30 mg/kg bolus of MPSS is given over 15 min and after 45-min, an infusion of 5.4 mg/kg/h is given. MPSS is continued for a total of 24 h.
| Legal Implications|| |
There is widely prevailing dogma that direct laryngoscopy is hazardous in the presence of cervical instability. It would be sad if any case of tracheal intubation in a patient with an unstable neck was brought to the courts based on this unsound dogma. It is difficult to prove and even harder to disprove laryngoscopy as a cause for SCI. Pre-operative neurological findings and any precautions taken should be recorded. A record of adequate care at laryngoscopy and also during the whole of anaesthesia and postoperative period are important in the event of later medico-legal proceedings.
| Conclusion|| |
The debate on implication of airway management for the neurological deterioration though cervical SCI produced by airway manoeuvres continues. The current evidence is insufficient to conclude on safety or lack of thereof, for airway management in the presence of cervical spine instability. There have only been a few case reports of possible damage to the spinal cord from airway management. As long as we take careful measures to protect the neck (such as manual in-line head and neck stabilisation), direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation can be performed safely without damaging the cervical spine in the majority of patients. The current opinion is that most neurological injuries during anaesthesia are the result of deformation of cord, impaired perfusion, or both. Meticulous attention should also be paid towards maintenance of cord perfusion. Data demonstrating the safety of orotracheal intubation with MILS has caused the emphasis to shift from use of a specific technique to operator skill and comfort.
| Acknowledgements|| |
We thank Prof. Gopinath Ramachandran for reviewing the manuscript and giving his valuable suggestions.
| References|| |
Powell JF, Woodcock T, Luscombe FE. Atlanto-axial subluxation in Down's syndrome. Anaesthesia 1990;45:1049-51.
Yaszemski MJ, Shepler TR. Sudden death from cord compression associated with atlanto-axial instability in rheumatoid arthritis. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:338-41.
Hastings RH, Kelley SD. Neurologic deterioration associated with airway management in a cervical spine-injured patient. Anesthesiology 1993;78:580-3.
Powell RM, Heath KJ. Quadraplegia in a patient with an undiagnosed odontoid peg fracture. The importance of cervical spine immobilisation in patients with head injuries. J R Army Med Corps 1996;142:79-81.
Muckart DJ, Bhagwanjee S, van der Merwe R. Spinal cord injury as a result of endotracheal intubation in patients with undiagnosed cervical spine fractures. Anesthesiology 1997;87:418-20.
Yan K, Diggan MF. A case of central cord syndrome caused by intubation: A case report. J Spinal Cord Med 1997;20:230-2.
Farmer J, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ, Malone S, Balderston RA, Cotler JM. Neurologic deterioration after cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Disord 1998;11:192-6.
Redl G. Massive pyramidal tract signs after endotracheal intubation: A case report of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1262-4.
Edge CJ, Hyman N, Addy V, Anslow P, Kearns C, Stacey R et al
. Posterior spinal ligament rupture associated with laryngeal mask insertion in a patient with undisclosed unstable cervical spine. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:514-7.
Suderman VS, Crosby ET, Lui A. Elective oral tracheal intubation in cervical spine-injured adults. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:785-9.
Meschino A, Devitt JH, Koch JP, Szalai JP, Schwartz ML. The safety of awake tracheal intubation in cervical spine injury. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:114-7.
Wright SW, Robinson GG, Wright MB. Cervical spine injuries in blunt trauma patients requiring emergent endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:104-9.
Scannell G, Waxman K, Tominaga G, Barker S, Annas C. Orotracheal intubation in trauma patients with cervical fractures. Arch Surg 1993;128:903-5; discussion 05-6.
Criswell JC, Parr MJ, Nolan JP. Emergency airway management in patients with cervical spine injuries. Anaesthesia 1994;49:900-3.
Lord SA, Boswell WC, Williams JS, Odom JW, Boyd CR. Airway control in trauma patients with cervical spine fractures. Prehosp Disaster Med 1994;9:44-9.
Shatney CH, Brunner RD, Nguyen TQ. The safety of orotracheal intubation in patients with unstable cervical spine fracture or high spinal cord injury. American journal of surgery 1995;170:676-80.
McCrory C, Blunnie WP, Moriarty DC. Elective tracheal intubation in cervical spine injuries. Ir Med J 1997; 90: 234-5.
Patterson H. Emergency department intubation of trauma patients with undiagnosed cervical spine injury. Emerg Med J 2004;21:302-5.
Kawamoto E, Wakamatsu M, Fujikake K, Machino A, Kaida T, Nagasaka Y. [A case-control study of airway management for 68 patients with cervical spine injury: Comparison of the direct laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade and the fiberoptic bronchoscope]. Masui 2010;59:976-80.
Panjabi MM, Thibodeau LL, Crisco JJ, White AA. What constitutes spinal instability? Clin Neurosurg 1988;34:313-39.
Fujioka S, Niimi Y, Hirata K, Nakamura I, Morita S. Tetraplegia after coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 2003;97:979-80.
Hirose H, Akhrass R. Tetraplegia after coronary artery bypass, a rare complication. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;11:270-2.
Naja Z, Zeidan A, Maaliki H, Zoubeir S, El-Khatib R, Baraka A. Tetraplegia after coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with undiagnosed cervical stenosis. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1883-4.
Kudo T, Sato Y, Kowatari K, Nitobe T, Hirota K. Postoperative transient tetraplegia in two patients caused by cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Anaesthesia 2011;66:213-6.
Li CC, Yie JC, Lai CH, Hung MH. Quadriplegia after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Look before you place the neck in an extended position. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013;27:e16-7.
Ford P, Gabbot DA: Airway in cervical trauma. In: Ian Calder AP, Core Topics in Airway Management
, First edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 139.
Weglinski MR, Berge KH, Davis DH. New-onset neurologic deficits after general anesthesia for MRI. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:101-3.
Dickerman RD, Mittler MA, Warshaw C, Epstein JA. Spinal cord injury in a 14-year-old male secondary to cervical hyperflexion with exercise. Spinal Cord 2006;44:192-5.
Hindman BJ, Palecek JP, Posner KL, Traynelis VC, Lee LA, Sawin PD, et al
. Cervical spinal cord, root, and bony spine injuries: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2011;114:782-95.
Fitzgerald RD, Krafft P, Skrbensky G, Pernerstorfer T, Steiner E, Kapral S et al
. Excursions of the cervical spine during tracheal intubation: Blind oral intubation compared with direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1994;49:111-5.
Gajraj NM, Chason DP, Shearer VE. Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation: Comparison of the Belscope and Macintosh blades. Anaesthesia 1994;49:772-4.
Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kunzel KH, Gaber O, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Cervical spine motion during airway management: A cinefluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1274-8.
Kihara S, Watanabe S, Brimacombe J, Taguchi N, Yaguchi Y, Yamasaki Y. Segmental cervical spine movement with the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line stabilization in patients with cervical pathology undergoing cervical spine surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:195-200.
Lennarson PJ, Smith D, Todd MM, Carras D, Sawin PD, Brayton J et al
. Segmental cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation of the intact and injured spine with and without external stabilization. J Neurosurg 2000;92:201-6.
Sahin A, Salman MA, Erden IA, Aypar U. Upper cervical vertebrae movement during intubating laryngeal mask, fibreoptic and direct laryngoscopy: A video-fluoroscopic study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21: 19-23.
Wahlen BM, Gercek E. Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:907-13.
Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: A fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg 2005;101:910-5.
Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1050-5.
Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 2008;63:635-40.
Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Kamata T, Yokochi M, Hara K. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: Fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:120-4.
Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Theriault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: Direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2008;106:935-41.
Houde BJ, Williams SR, Cadrin-Chenevert A, Guilbert F, Drolet P. A comparison of cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation with the trachlight(r) or the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1638-43.
Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM. Cervical spine motion: A fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology 2009;111:97-101.
Wong DM, Prabhu A, Chakraborty S, Tan G, Massicotte EM, Cooper R. Cervical spine motion during flexible bronchoscopy compared with the Lo-Pro GlideScope. Br J Anaesth 2009;102:424-30.
Donaldson WF, 3 rd
, Heil BV, Donaldson VP, Silvaggio VJ. The effect of airway maneuvers on the unstable C1-C2 segment. A cadaver study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:1215-8.
Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology 2006;104:1293-318.
Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:33-9.
Horton WA, Fahy L, Charters P. Defining a standard intubating position using "angle finder". Br J Anaesth 1989;62:6-12.
Sawin PD, Todd MM, Traynelis VC, Farrell SB, Nader A, Sato Y, et al
. Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo
cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality. Anesthesiology 1996;85:26-36.
Gerling MC, Davis DP, Hamilton RS, Morris GF, Vilke GM, Garfin SR, et al
. Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:293-300.
Majernick TG, Bieniek R, Houston JB, Hughes HG. Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:417-20.
Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, Todd MM, Sato Y, Traynelis VC. Cervical spinal motion during intubation: Efficacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of complete segmental instability. J Neurosurg 2001;94:265-70.
Delamarter RB, Sherman J, Carr JB. Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Recovery after immediate and delayed decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995;77:1042-9.
Dinsmore J, Bacon RC, Hollway TE. The effect of increasing degrees of spinal flexion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Anaesthesia 1998;53:431-4.
Mashour GA, Stallmer ML, Kheterpal S, Shanks A. Predictors of difficult intubation in patients with cervical spine limitations. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2008;20:110-5.
Hastings RH, Delson N. Balancing the force of direct laryngoscopy with manual in-line stabilization. Anesthesiology 2009;111:1158-9; author reply 59-60.
Calder I, Calder J, Crockard HA. Difficult direct laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine disease. Anaesthesia 1995;50:756-63.
Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:344-8.
Konishi A, Sakai T, Nishiyama T, Higashizawa T, Bito H. [Cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation using the McCoy laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh and the Miller laryngoscopes]. Masui 1997;46:124-7.
Kilic T, Goksu E, Durmaz D, Yildiz G. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation with different airway devices. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:1034-6.
Gercek E, Wahlen BM, Rommens PM. In vivo
ultrasound real-time motion of the cervical spine during intubation under manual in-line stabilization: A comparison of intubation methods. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:29-36.
Rudolph C, Schneider JP, Wallenborn J, Schaffranietz L. Movement of the upper cervical spine during laryngoscopy: A comparison of the Bonfils intubation fibrescope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2005;60:668-72.
Watts AD, Gelb AW, Bach DB, Pelz DM. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1335-42.
Bhardwaj N, Jain K, Rao M, Mandal AK. Assessment of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with Macintosh and Truview laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013;29:308-12.
Uzun S, Erden IA, Pamuk AG, Yavuz K, Cekirge S, Aypar U. Comparison of Flexiblade and Macintosh laryngoscopes: Cervical extension angles during orotracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2010;65:692-6.
Kill C, Risse J, Wallot P, Seidl P, Steinfeldt T, Wulf H. Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine. J Emerg Med 2013;44:750-6.
Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Sugimoto H. [Cervical spine motion during laryngoscopy with the Pentax-AWS with a new thinner blade (Introck-T)]. Masui 2013;62:682-5.
Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Takenaka Y, Kadoya T. Approach combining the airway scope and the bougie for minimizing movement of the cervical spine during endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1335-40.
Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: A video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:563-7.
Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Shaikh AA, Craen RA. Cervical spine motion: A fluoroscopic comparison of Shikani Optical Stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:441-7.
McLeod AD, Calder I. Spinal cord injury and direct laryngoscopy-the legend lives on. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:705-9.
Furlan JC, Fehlings MG. Cardiovascular complications after acute spinal cord injury: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Neurosurg Focus 2008;25:E13.
Martirosyan NL, Feuerstein JS, Theodore N, Cavalcanti DD, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Blood supply and vascular reactivity of the spinal cord under normal and pathological conditions. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;15:238-51.
Guha A, Tator CH, Rochon J. Spinal cord blood flow and systemic blood pressure after experimental spinal cord injury in rats. Stroke 1989;20:372-7.
Weidauer S, Nichtweiss M, Lanfermann H, Zanella FE. Spinal cord infarction: MR imaging and clinical features in 16 cases. Neuroradiology 2002;44:851-7.
Bracken MB. Steroids for acute spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;1:CD001046.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Airway Management in Trauma
| ||George Kovacs,Nicholas Sowers |
| ||Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 2018; 36(1): 61 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A Randomized Crossover Study Comparing Cervical Spine Motion During Intubation Between Two Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Patients With Simulated Cervical Immobilization
| ||Tae Kyong Kim,Je-Do Son,Hyungseok Seo,Yun-Seok Lee,Jinyoung Bae,and Hee-Pyoung Park |
| ||Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017; 125(2): 485 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Vertebral anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review
| ||R.W. Renkema,C.J.J.M. Caron,I.M.J. Mathijssen,E.B. Wolvius,D.J. Dunaway,C.R. Forrest,B.L. Padwa,M.J. Koudstaal |
| ||International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Cervical Instability in Pierre Robin Sequence
| ||Rebecca M. Barr,Sabina A. Khan,Manish N. Shah,Soham Roy,John F. Teichgraeber,Matthew R. Greives |
| ||Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2016; 27(7): 1674 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Neurological complications in adult spinal deformity surgery
| ||Justin A. Iorio,Patrick Reid,Han Jo Kim |
| ||Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|