• Users Online: 2661
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents    
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 736-743  

Anaesthetic consideration in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices scheduled for surgery

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Relief, Fortis Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication13-Sep-2017

Correspondence Address:
Murali Chakravarthy
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Relief, Fortis Hospitals, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru - 560 076, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_346_17

Rights and Permissions

With advances in cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery, several newer implantable cardiac devices have become common in the surgical population. Multichamber pacemakers, implanted cardiac defibrillators and ventricular assist devices are frequent in current day practice. Many of the newer implantable cardiac electronic devices are targeted at managing heart failure. While managing such patients for non-cardiac surgeries, specific issues related to equipment characteristics and troubleshooting should be a priority for the anaesthesiologists. There is a possibility of malfunction of the devices resulting in catastrophic outcomes. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the pathophysiology, device characteristics and troubleshooting before embarking on anaesthetising patients with implantable cardiac electronic devices.

Keywords: Cardiac resynchronisation, haemodynamic monitoring, implantable intracardiac electronic devices, pacing, troubleshooting

How to cite this article:
Chakravarthy M, Prabhakumar D, George A. Anaesthetic consideration in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices scheduled for surgery. Indian J Anaesth 2017;61:736-43

How to cite this URL:
Chakravarthy M, Prabhakumar D, George A. Anaesthetic consideration in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices scheduled for surgery. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 23];61:736-43. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2017/61/9/736/214501

   Introduction Top

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are used to treat problems with rhythm and heart failure. [Table 1] shows the types of implantable electronic devices (IEDs) commonly used. Implantable haemodynamic monitoring devices have been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States of America in order to assist in heart failure management. It is vital for the anaesthesiologists to know the equipment characteristics, troubleshooting and their interaction with anaesthetic manoeuvres and agents to safely anaesthetise the patients with any of these implanted devices. The implanted devices treat near-fatal conditions (such as extreme bradycardia, ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia). Anaesthesiologists who are alien to the management of these CIEDs could be situationally challenged, which may result in deleterious effects to the patient and cause permanent device damage. In the United States of America alone, more than 3 million people have PPMs implanted and about 300,000 people have artificial implantable cardioverter defibrillators (AICDs) with pacing capabilities.[1],[2] The number of people with these CIEDs are increasing world over and present more frequently for non-cardiac surgery. In a recent survey from India, Shenthar et al. reported that about 37,000 cardiac device implantations take place in India annually.[3] About 80% of these procedures consisted of bradycardia-related permanent pacemaker (PM) insertions, 10% were ICDs and the remaining were cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRTDs). Hence, it is reasonable to expect anaesthesiologists to encounter patients with either one of the CIEDs scheduled for surgery in their day-to-day practice. Discussion about PPM [Figure 1]a, AICD [Figure 1]b, CRT [Figure 1]c, CRTD [Figure 1]d and haemodynamic monitoring implants[4] is relevant.
Table 1: Type of devices

Click here to view
Figure 1: (a) Lead disposition of dual chamber pacemaker. A: atrial lead; V: ventricular lead. (b) Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. (c) Leads in right atrium, right ventricle and coronary sinus to aid in cardiac resynchronization therapy. (d) Cardiac resynchronization with defibrillation device in situ

Click here to view

   Technology Overview Top

Permanent pacemakers

A single-chamber pacemaker has a pulse generator with a single lead implanted in the right ventricle (RV) Dual-chamber pacemakers have a pulse generator with two leads, one implanted in the right atrium and the other in the RV [Figure 1]a Biventricular pacemakers have a pulse generator with three leads implanted in the right atrium, RV and coronary sinus which allows pacing of the left ventricle.

All cardiac pacemakers consist of a pulse generator, which provides the electrical impulse from a battery power source implanted commonly in the infraclavicular region of the anterior chest wall, and one or more electrodes (referred to as leads), which deliver the electrical impulse from the pulse generator to the myocardium. The leads are placed either percutaneously or via venous cutdown.

Epicardial cardiac pacemaker systems utilise a pulse generator with leads that are surgically attached directly to the epicardial surface of the heart. These systems have largely been replaced by transvenous systems. The major role for epicardial pacing systems in current practice is for temporary pacing following cardiac surgery;[5] such systems, however, are designed as temporary systems that must be removed within the 1st day to weeks following cardiac surgery.

Leadless systems have a self-contained system which includes both the pulse generator and the electrode within a single unit that is placed into the RV via a transvenous approach.[6],[7],[8]

A pacemaker with additional features to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias by way of defibrillation and anti-tachycardia pacing is an AICD [Figure 1]c. AICDs may be implanted for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death from ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

The AICD system comprises three elements:[9],[10],[11]

  1. Pacing/sensing electrodes: The lead with the pace/sense electrodes is placed transvenously, with the distal electrode positioned on the right ventricular apical endocardium. Dual-chamber AICDs have an additional lead with another pair of pace/sense electrodes in the right atrium for atrial sensing and pacing.
  2. Defibrillation electrodes: Most contemporary AICD systems have two or three defibrillation electrodes. Along with the distal coil in the RV on the transvenous lead, some ICD leads have a second defibrillation coil proximal to the right ventricular coil. In addition, with 'active can' technology, the metal housing of the ICD serves as one of the shocking electrodes.
  3. Pulse generator: The pulse generator contains the sensing circuitry as well as the high-voltage capacitors and battery. The development of small pulse generators (thickness ≤15 mm) has permitted pectoral implantation in nearly all patients.

The current ICD lead systems utilising between one and three leads are typically placed transvenously via the axillary, subclavian or cephalic vein. Modern devices are small enough to be implanted in the pectoral region, either subcutaneously or submuscularly, similar to a pacemaker implantation.

   Pacemaker Nomenclature Top

A standard classification has been developed to help understand and use PPMs [Table 2]. A 'three'-letter NBG code was first proposed in 1974 and was universally accepted.[12] Subsequently, a five-letter code was proposed and is the mode currently used and accepted. However, most clinicians in their day-to-day communication continue to use the three-letter model.
Table 2: Pacemaker codes

Click here to view

Position I – Reflects the chamber(s) paced; Position II – Reflects the chamber(s) sensed. Programmed in the 'O' mode, a device will pace automatically at a specified rate, ignoring any intrinsic rhythm; Position III – Position III refers to how the pacemaker responds to a sensed event; 'I' indicates that a sensed event inhibits the output pulse and causes the pacemaker to recycle for one or more timing cycles. 'T' indicates that an output pulse is triggered in response to a sensed event. 'D' indicates dual modes of response and is restricted to dual chamber systems. An event sensed in the atrium inhibits the atrial output but triggers a ventricular output. There is a programmable delay between the sensed atrial event and the triggered ventricular output to mimic the normal PR interval. If the ventricular lead senses a native ventricular signal during the programmed delay, it will inhibit the ventricular output. 'O' indicates no response to sensed input; it is most commonly used in conjunction with an 'O' in the second position; Position IV – The fourth position reflects rate modulation, also referred to as rate responsive or rate adaptive pacing. 'R' indicates that the pacemaker has rate modulation and incorporates a sensor to adjust its programmed paced heart rate in response to patient activity. 'O' indicates that rate modulation is either unavailable or disabled; Position V – Rarely used fifth position. Specifies only the location or absence of multisite pacing, defined as stimulation sites in both atria, both ventricles, more than one stimulation site in any single chamber or a combination of these. The most common application of multisite pacing is biventricular pacing for the management of heart failure.

Commonly used modes of pacing are shown in Table 3. VVI pacing with a transvenous catheter inserted into the RV is a common clinical scenario. It implies that demand ventricular pacing is initiated; the output is inhibited by sensed ventricular activity. Anaesthesiologists must be familiar with this mode and ECG showing 'pacing spikes' [Figure 2].
Figure 2: VVI pacing. Arrows show pacing 'spikes'

Click here to view

   Electromagnetic Interference Top

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) is the potential disruption of the operation of an electronic device when it is in the vicinity of an electromagnetic field generated by an external source. During surgical procedures, the function of CIEDs may be affected by EMI, most commonly due to use of an electrocautery unit (ECU). Cardiac IEDs with unipolar sensing configuration are more susceptible to EMI than those with bipolar sensing. ECU uses radiofrequency current to transect tissues and achieve haemostasis. The effects of ECU on CIEDs differ depending on whether the ECU used is monopolar or bipolar. Current flow is localised between the two poles of the bipolar cautery instrument and usually not associated with problems. When monopolar cautery is used, the current flow is not restricted and spreads throughout the body. It is important for anaesthesiologists to realise that many electrical interferences such as electrocautery may be perceived by the pacemaker as intrinsic rhythm and the pulse generation may be inhibited. With ongoing electrical interference monitoring, ECG alone may not alert the anaesthesiologists involved in patient care about the absence of heart rhythm. In such cases, it be may wise to monitor the pulse plethysmography from pulse oximeter waveform or arterial waveform.[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19]

   Pre-Operative Assessment Top

In addition to a thorough history and physical examination, a focused interview on the CIED is essential. In most patients, a detailed patient information card will be present detailing the type of device and model number, the indication for insertion and current settings.

Pre-operative chest radiograph[20] can give the following information: difference between a PPM and AICD; the number and position of lead (s) and the presence of a fractured lead. The RV lead in an AICD has two thick opaque sections representing high-voltage coils for defibrillatory shock delivery and terminates in the RV.

   Device Interrogation Top

The rhythm and functioning of the CIED must be reconfirmed in the pre-operative period.[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30] In most patients, this can be accomplished by accessing the results of a recent interrogation of the CIED. This is performed by trained technicians, whose contact details are available with the patient or the cardiologist. Recommendations of the Heart Rhythm Society for CIED interrogation before surgery are as follows: within 6 months for an AICD, within 12 months for a conventional PPM and within 3–6 months for any CRT device.

Patients who have a pacing burden of ≥40% are deemed to be pacing dependent. An electrocardiogram that reveals a predominately paced rhythm also implies pacing dependence. The ECG should be examined for P-waves and pacing spikes. A pacing spike before every P-wave and/or QRS complex suggests that the patient is pacemaker dependent.

During pre-operative evaluation, the following should be addressed: If the patient is pacing dependent and there is a potential for interaction with EMI, then the mode of the PPM must be changed to asynchronous mode of pacing using a programming machine and in some cases a magnet.

When the patient has an AICD and there is potential for generation of EMI, the anti-tachycardia function of the AICD must be suspended.

   Reprogramming With a Programming Device Top

A reprogramming machine is used to suspend anti-tachyarrhythmia settings. It is essential to have transcutaneous pacing when the anti-tachyarrhythmia functions are disabled, as the AICD will not respond when there is VT. The advantages of using a reprogramming machine include changing an AICD to asynchronous mode and disabling a rate responsive sensor.[24] However, the use of a reprogramming machine must be done by trained personnel and the changes are not quickly reversible like that of a magnet.

   Role of a Magnet Top

A magnet is used to suspend anti-tachyarrhythmia functions of an AICD or to produce asynchronous pacing in a PPM. The use has been advocated by certain societies.[21],[25] However, the routine use of the magnet is not encouraged.[22],[23],[30] When a magnet is applied on a PPM, asynchronous pacing will be initiated and when applied on an AICD anti-tachyarrhythmia detection is suspended but not pacing capabilities.

Since a magnet cannot initiate asynchronous pacing mode in an AICD, EMI can result in bradycardia or asystole. Other disadvantages include ability to maintain the position of the magnet in lateral or prone position, possible compromise to operative field sterility and presence of surgical drapes can hinder access to the magnet.

A word of caution while magnets are being used: the magnets have to be used by either technicians with knowledge of their effect or by doctors capable of handling the resultant asynchronous rhythm.

   Intraoperative Management Top

It is essential that the patient has continuous ECG and pulse oximetry monitoring and arterial pressure monitoring if indicated to give a beat-to-beat display and for correlation with artefacts and electrical interference.

The ECG monitor display should be selected such that the presence of pacing spikes is displayed. The filter in the ECG monitor should be set at 'diagnostic' so that the pacing spikes can be appreciated.

Use of a bipolar cautery is preferred. The electrosurgical receiving plate must be positioned so that the current pathway does not pass through or near the pacemaker. Electrocautery bursts should be limited to one second every 10 second interval. Artefacts maybe picked up as QRS complexes and thus a false heart rate could be displayed. The presence of either a pulse oximeter or an arterial line will display the true heart rate, and determine whether the electrical pacing signal results in a mechanical ventricular contraction and can help detect the presence of an adequate arterial pulse or asystole.[21],[24]

It is essential to have equipment for urgent transcutaneous pacing, defibrillation or cardioversion. Transcutaneous pacing or defibrillator pads are best placed when the device has been reprogrammed. For an emergency, an external defibrillator with pacing capabilities must be available. The transcutaneous pacing or defibrillator pads must not be placed directly over the CIED. In a majority of the patients, the CIED is left sided, and the transcutaneous pacing or defibrillator pads can be positioned in an anteroposterior fashion.

The cautery pad must be positioned such that the current from the ECU does not cross the CIED generator or leads.

During insertion of a central venous line, the anti-tachyarrhythmia function must be suspended and asynchronous mode must be initiated. An external defibrillator with pacing capabilities must be available. Continuous monitoring of the ECG and pulse oximetry is essential; waveform monitoring is advocated during insertion of central venous line whenever possible. The chance of dislodgment of a lead is maximum within 3 months of insertion of the CIED.[21],[31] A pre-central line radiograph will help us with the position of the leads and a post-central line X-ray will help diagnose possible lead dislodgment.

   Anaesthetic Agents Top

Anaesthetic agents have no effect on the function of CIEDs in the perioperative period. However, in patients with bradycardia, avoiding high doses of fentanyl or dexmedetomidine may be prudent to prevent PPM dependence.[32],[33],[34] In patients with long QT syndrome, drugs which cause QT prolongation such as methadone, haloperidol, ondansetron and high doses of inhalation agents are best avoided due to the theoretical risk of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.[35],[36],[37],[38],[39]

   Haemodynamic Management Top

If the patient is pacemaker dependent, and the PPM has been programmed to a fixed rate, it is important to realise that tachycardia will not be seen in response to hypovolaemia. Careful attention to fluid replacement is essential.

   Intraoperative Emergencies Top

In the event of an arrhythmia or bradycardia, before attempting defibrillation, the magnet if applied should be removed to permit reactivation of anti-tachyarrhythmia function. All sources of EMI should be discontinued to allow proper interpretation of the rhythm and appropriate therapy. Failure of the rhythm to revert after removal of the magnet will require either defibrillation or cardioversion depending on the rhythm. During the occurrence of such an event, bedside ECG recording with paper is helpful to determine the ventricular rate and rhythm. There may be a possibility that the recorded ventricular rate is lower than the set rate on the AICD, requiring reprogramming of the device in the post-operative period.

Total failure of a device is rare. Exposure of older devices to EMI rarely results in total failure. Problems with the device may manifest as inappropriate delivery of shocks or 'runaway' high rate (180–200 beats/min).[22],[39]

   Emergency Surgery Top

In an emergency, time may be inadequate to evaluate the CIED. Patients who are undergoing supraumbilical surgeries are at a higher risk for EMI from the ECU if monopolar cautery use is needed.

Application of a magnet would be ideal if time permits. An ECG paper recording pre- and post-magnet application will allow us to know if the desired response is achieved.

Application of transcutaneous pacing/defibrillator pads is essential along with a standby external defibrillator with pacing capabilities. Continuous ECG, pulse oximetry monitoring and additionally an arterial line if indicated are essential.

   Post-Operative Management Top

The rate and rhythm must be monitored continuously in the post-operative period.[19],[24],[40] The CIED must be interrogated in the immediate post-operative period. In the presence of haemodynamic instability, selection of a higher heart rate or a more optimal atrioventricular delay may be required. Following surgery till the device is reprogrammed to the original setting, the patient must be continuously monitored on an ECG and pulse oximetry. It is essential that both transcutaneous pacing/defibrillator pads and an external defibrillator are immediately available.

   Pacemakers and Specific Clinical Circumstances Top

Magnetic resonance imaging

The potential for magnetic field-induced lead heating of the CIED during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can result in myocardial thermal injury and changes in pacing properties.[41],[42],[43]

The term 'magnetic resonance (MR) conditional' refers to any device for which a specified MRI environment with specified conditions of use does not pose a known hazard. The term 'MR safe' requires there be no hazard in any MR environment. For example, plastic objects are MR safe. No CIED has an MR safe designation. The designation MR unsafe refers to an object that is known to pose hazards in all MR environments. 'MR non-conditional' systems include all CIED systems other than those that meet MR conditional labelling.

   Radiation Therapy Top

High-energy ionising radiation used in radiation therapy can cause damage to pacemakers, even at very small doses.[44] The possible damage[45],[46],[47] can be divided into three types: (a) temporary change resulting in oversensing, (b) reset to factory settings and (c) complete device failure

Recommendations for management of a patient with CIED for radiation therapy[48] include to assess if the patient is pacing dependent and use a non-neutron producing treatment rather than a neutron producing treatment to minimise the risk of device reset. In the event a neutron producing treatment is used, the CIED must be evaluated every week. The CIED must be relocated if the current location of the CIED will interfere with the treatment.

   Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Top

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been used to treat upper urinary tract calculi. In the past, the presence of piezoelectric crystal for rate adaptive pacing could be damaged by the ESWL shock wave. However, modern devices do not incorporate piezoelectric crystals. For patients who have any significant degree of pacemaker dependence, pacing mode should be reprogrammed to VOO or DOO because of the potential for inhibition of the ventricular pacing circuit due to interference from the ESWL wave.

   Direct Current Cardioversion and Defibrillation Top

Transthoracic direct current (DC) shock is used to treat life-threatening atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. 'Zener' diode is incorporated into modern CIEDs to protect against damage from DC shocks.[49] The diode directs a surge in current toward the electrode, protecting the pacemaker circuitry but delivering this energy to the endocardium. The cardioverter-defibrillator can also cause capacitive coupling with the endocardial lead, causing direct discharge at the electrode-endocardium interface.[50] This leads to transient failure to capture by the CIED but in some instances due to the large discharge of focal energy permanent failure can ensue. Positioning of the paddles close on the chest wall can lead to the development of electrostatic discharges which can be interpreted as signals by AICDs.

Precautions for DC cardioversion and defibrillation in patients with AICDs include ascertaining that the paddles should be as far (>10 cm) from the pulse generator as possible without compromising the efficacy of the procedure and that the current path should be perpendicular to the plane of the pacing system, using anterior-posterior paddles.

   Recent Advances: Implantable Haemodynamic Monitors/Pressure Sensors Top

These devices are essentially toward haemodynamic management in patients with heart failure. These devices measure and upload the pulmonary artery blood pressure on a regular basis to assist the physician in controlling heart failure. They are new in the market and anaesthesia in patients having them is still a novelty. The first of these devices used is a diaphragm-tipped pressure catheter that would be passively placed in a vascular structure. In the case of the Medtronic Chronicle device, a generator was implanted subcutaneously and attached to a lead with its electrode tip placed subcutaneously in the RV by passive fixation. This allows for remote measurement of RV systolic and diastolic pressure, imputed PA diastolic pressure, heart rate, activity, RV dp/dt and core body temperature. CardioMEMS is yet another heart failure management device that is placed in the distal pulmonary artery for monitoring PA pressure digitally, remotely. It is said that increasing PA pressure in heart failure situations heralds the onset of requirement of repeated hospital admissions. This instrument could permit the physician in viewing the trend of PA pressure over 90 days.

   Summary Top

Anaesthesiologists will encounter patients with CIEDS during their practice. Since after CIED implantation, the patients are reasonably well rehabilitated, they would be presenting for non-cardiac surgeries. Anaesthesiologists irrespective of the subspeciality of their practice may make an effort to understand equipment characteristics, troubleshooting and bail out of catastrophic complications. The number of CIED implants will increase with increasing number of patients having indications for placement of the same; thus, the need to understand them becomes all the more important.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Pokorney SD, Miller AL, Chen AY, Thomas L, Fonarow GC, de Lemos JA, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use among medicare patients with low ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2015;313:2433-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kremers MS, Hammill SC, Berul CI, Koutras C, Curtis JS, Wang Y, et al. The National ICD Registry Report: Version 2.1 including leads and pediatrics for years 2010 and 2011. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:e59-65.  Back to cited text no. 2
Shenthar J, Bohra S, Jetley V, Vora A, Lokhandwala Y, Nabar A, et al. A survey of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in India: By Indian Society of Electrocardiology and Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Indian Heart J 2016;68:68-71.  Back to cited text no. 3
Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA 3rd, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008;117:e350-408.  Back to cited text no. 4
Chia PL, Foo D. A practical approach to perioperative management of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Singapore Med J 2015;56:538-41.  Back to cited text no. 5
Miller MA, Neuzil P, Dukkipati SR, Reddy VY. Leadless cardiac pacemakers: Back to the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1179-89.  Back to cited text no. 6
Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K, Neuzil P, Zhang S, et al. A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system. N Engl J Med 2016;374:533-41.  Back to cited text no. 7
Sperzel J, Burri H, Gras D, Tjong FV, Knops RE, Hindricks G, et al. State of the art of leadless pacing. Europace 2015;17:1508-13.  Back to cited text no. 8
DiMarco JP. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1836-47.  Back to cited text no. 9
Fenelon G, Huvelle E, Brugada P. Initial clinical experience with a new small sized third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Results of a multicenter study. European Ventak Mini Investigator Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20 (12 Pt 1):2967-74.  Back to cited text no. 10
Thijssen J, Borleffs CJ, van Rees JB, Man S, de Bie MK, Venlet J, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator longevity under clinical circumstances: An analysis according to device type, generation, and manufacturer. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:513-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
Bernstein AD, Daubert JC, Fletcher RD, Hayes DL, Lüderitz B, Reynolds DW, et al. The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology/British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:260-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
Schulman PM, Rozner MA, Sera V, Stecker EC. Patients with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Med Clin North Am 2013;97:1051-75.  Back to cited text no. 13
Titel JH, el-Etr AA. Fibrillation resulting from pacemaker electrodes and electrocautery during surgery. Anesthesiology 1968;29:845-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
Lamas GA, Antman EM, Gold JP, Braunwald NS, Collins JJ. Pacemaker backup-mode reversion and injury during cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:155-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
Bailey AG, Lacey SR. Intraoperative pacemaker failure in an infant. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:912-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
Godin JF, Petitot JC. STIMAREC report. Pacemaker failures due to electrocautery and external electric shock. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:1011.  Back to cited text no. 17
Belott PH, Sands S, Warren J. Resetting of DDD pacemakers due to EMI. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984;7:169-72.  Back to cited text no. 18
Levine PA, Balady GJ, Lazar HL, Belott PH, Roberts AJ. Electrocautery and pacemakers: Management of the paced patient subject to electrocautery. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;41:313-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
Jacob S, Shahzad MA, Maheshwari R, Panaich SS, Aravindhakshan R. Cardiac rhythm device identification algorithm using X-Rays: CaRDIA-X. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:915-22.  Back to cited text no. 20
Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA, Asirvatham SJ, Cheng A, Chung MK, et al. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: Facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1114-54.  Back to cited text no. 21
Schulman PM, Rozner MA. Case report: Use caution when applying magnets to pacemakers or defibrillators for surgery. Anesth Analg 2013;117:422-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
Rooke GA, Bowdle TA. Perioperative management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: It's not just about the magnet. Anesth Analg 2013;117:292-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: An updated report by the American society of anesthesiologists task force on perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Anesthesiology 2011;114:247-61.  Back to cited text no. 24
Healey JS, Merchant R, Simpson C, Tang T, Beardsall M, Tung S, et al. Society position statement: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can J Anaesth 2012;59:394-407.  Back to cited text no. 25
Guidelines for the Perioperative Management of Patients with Implantable Pacemakers or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, Where the Use of Surgical Diathermy/Electrocautery is Anticipated. Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency. Available from: http://www.heartrhythmuk.org.uk/files/file/Docs/Guidelines/MHRA%20guidelines%20surgery%20and%20ICDs.pdf. [Last accessed on 2017 July 7].  Back to cited text no. 26
Levine PA. Response to “rate-adaptive cardiac pacing: Implications of environmental noise during craniotomy”. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1261.  Back to cited text no. 27
Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, Moore R, Rogers JC, Kollengode A, et al. Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg 2011;213:83-92.  Back to cited text no. 28
Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): Description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:907-25.  Back to cited text no. 29
Considerations When Using Electrocautery in Patients Implanted with Older Generation St. Jude Medical Pacemakers. Available from: http://www.professional.sjm.com/professional/resources/product-performance/pacemaker-012914-communication/physician-communication. [Last accessed on 2017 Jul 18].  Back to cited text no. 30
Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, Diemberger I, Martignani C, Boriani G. Left ventricular lead stabilization to retain cardiac resynchronization therapy at long term: When is it advisable? Europace 2014;16:533-40.  Back to cited text no. 31
Gerlach AT, Murphy CV, Dasta JF. An updated focused review of dexmedetomidine in adults. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43:2064-74.  Back to cited text no. 32
Arnold RW, Jensen PA, Kovtoun TA, Maurer SA, Schultz JA. The profound augmentation of the oculocardiac reflex by fast acting opioids. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 2004;19:215-22.  Back to cited text no. 33
Healey JS, Merchant R, Simpson C, Tang T, Beardsall M, Tung S, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can J Cardiol 2012;28:141-51.  Back to cited text no. 34
Michaloudis D, Fraidakis O, Petrou A, Gigourtsi C, Parthenakis F. Anaesthesia and the QT interval. Effects of isoflurane and halothane in unpremedicated children. Anaesthesia 1998;53:435-9.  Back to cited text no. 35
Michaloudis D, Fraidakis O, Lefaki T, Kanakoudis F, Askitopoulou H. Anaesthesia and the QT interval in humans: Effects of halothane and isoflurane in premedicated children. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:623-8.  Back to cited text no. 36
Gallagher JD, Weindling SN, Anderson G, Fillinger MP. Effects of sevoflurane on QT interval in a patient with congenital long QT syndrome. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1569.  Back to cited text no. 37
Rooke GA1, Lombaard SA, Van Norman GA, Dziersk J, Natrajan KM, Larson LW, et al. Initial experience of an anesthesiology-based service for perioperative management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Anesthesiology 2015;123:1024.  Back to cited text no. 38
Paventi S, Santevecchi A, Ranieri R. Effects of sevoflurane versus propofol on QT interval. Minerva Anestesiol 2001;67:637-40.  Back to cited text no. 39
Yildirim H, Adanir T, Atay A, Katircioglu K, Savaci S. The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane on QT interval of the ECG. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:566-70.  Back to cited text no. 40
Pili-Floury S, Farah E, Samain E, Schauvliege F, Marty J. Perioperative outcome of pacemaker patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:514-6.  Back to cited text no. 41
Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Judy J, Paul Finn J, Ennis DB. The dependence of radiofrequency induced pacemaker lead tip heating on the electrical conductivity of the medium at the lead tip. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:606-13.  Back to cited text no. 42
Beinart R, Nazarian S. Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: From engineering principles to clinical practice. Circulation 2013;128:2799-809.  Back to cited text no. 43
Luechinger R, Zeijlemaker VA, Pedersen EM, Mortensen P, Falk E, Duru F, et al. In vivo heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2005;26:376-83.  Back to cited text no. 44
Raitt MH, Stelzer KJ, Laramore GE, Bardy GH, Dolack GL, Poole JE, et al. Runaway pacemaker during high-energy neutron radiation therapy. Chest 1994;106:955-7.  Back to cited text no. 45
Zecchin M, Morea G, Severgnini M, Sergi E, Baratto Roldan A, Bianco E, et al. Malfunction of cardiac devices after radiotherapy without direct exposure to ionizing radiation: Mechanisms and experimental data. Europace 2016;18:288-93.  Back to cited text no. 46
Hurkmans CW, Scheepers E, Springorum BG, Uiterwaal H. Influence of radiotherapy on the latest generation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:282-9.  Back to cited text no. 47
Augustynek M, Korpas D, Penhaker M, Cvek J, Binarova A. Monitoring of CRT-D devices during radiation therapy in vitro. Biomed Eng Online 2016;15:29.  Back to cited text no. 48
Mouton J, Haug R, Bridier A, Dodinot B, Eschwege F. Influence of high-energy photon beam irradiation on pacemaker operation. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:2879-93.  Back to cited text no. 49
Lau FY, Bilitch M, Wintroub HJ. Protection of implanted pacemakers from excessive electrical energy of D.C. shock. Am J Cardiol 1969;23:244-9.  Back to cited text no. 50


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
   Technology Overview
    Pacemaker Nomenc...
    Electromagnetic ...
    Pre-Operative As...
   Device Interrogation
    Reprogramming Wi...
   Role of a Magnet
    Intraoperative M...
   Anaesthetic Agents
    Haemodynamic Man...
    Intraoperative E...
   Emergency Surgery
    Post-Operative M...
    Pacemakers and S...
   Radiation Therapy
    Extracorporeal S...
    Direct Current C...
    Recent Advances:...
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded2474    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal